Cargando…

Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize real-world studies (RWSs) registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to help investigators better conduct relevant research in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 944 studies was performed on February 28, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 94...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yuanxiao, Tian, Ying, Pei, Shufen, Xie, Baoyuan, Xu, Xiaonan, Wang, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007912
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S402478
_version_ 1785018107382726656
author Li, Yuanxiao
Tian, Ying
Pei, Shufen
Xie, Baoyuan
Xu, Xiaonan
Wang, Bin
author_facet Li, Yuanxiao
Tian, Ying
Pei, Shufen
Xie, Baoyuan
Xu, Xiaonan
Wang, Bin
author_sort Li, Yuanxiao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize real-world studies (RWSs) registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to help investigators better conduct relevant research in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 944 studies was performed on February 28, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 944 studies were included. The included studies involved a total of 48 countries. China was the leading country in terms of the total number of registered studies (37.9%, 358), followed by the United States (19.7%, 186). Regarding intervention type, 42.4% (400) of the studies involved drugs, and only 9.1% (86) of the studies involved devices. Only 8.5% (80) of the studies mentioned both the detailed study design type and data source in the “Brief Summary”. A total of 49.4% (466) of studies had a sample size of 500 participants and above. Overall, 63% (595) of the studies were single-center studies. A total of 213 conditions were covered in the included studies. One-third of the studies (32.7%, 309) involved neoplasms (or tumors). China and the United States were very different regarding the study of different conditions. CONCLUSION: Although the pandemic has provided new opportunities for RWSs, the rigor of scientific research still needs to be emphasized. Special attention needs to be given to the correct and comprehensive description of the study design in the Brief Summary of registered studies, thereby promoting communication and understanding. In addition, deficiencies in ClinicalTrials.gov registration data remain prominent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10065426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100654262023-04-01 Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis Li, Yuanxiao Tian, Ying Pei, Shufen Xie, Baoyuan Xu, Xiaonan Wang, Bin Int J Gen Med Original Research OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize real-world studies (RWSs) registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to help investigators better conduct relevant research in clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 944 studies was performed on February 28, 2023. RESULTS: A total of 944 studies were included. The included studies involved a total of 48 countries. China was the leading country in terms of the total number of registered studies (37.9%, 358), followed by the United States (19.7%, 186). Regarding intervention type, 42.4% (400) of the studies involved drugs, and only 9.1% (86) of the studies involved devices. Only 8.5% (80) of the studies mentioned both the detailed study design type and data source in the “Brief Summary”. A total of 49.4% (466) of studies had a sample size of 500 participants and above. Overall, 63% (595) of the studies were single-center studies. A total of 213 conditions were covered in the included studies. One-third of the studies (32.7%, 309) involved neoplasms (or tumors). China and the United States were very different regarding the study of different conditions. CONCLUSION: Although the pandemic has provided new opportunities for RWSs, the rigor of scientific research still needs to be emphasized. Special attention needs to be given to the correct and comprehensive description of the study design in the Brief Summary of registered studies, thereby promoting communication and understanding. In addition, deficiencies in ClinicalTrials.gov registration data remain prominent. Dove 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10065426/ /pubmed/37007912 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S402478 Text en © 2023 Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Li, Yuanxiao
Tian, Ying
Pei, Shufen
Xie, Baoyuan
Xu, Xiaonan
Wang, Bin
Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_fullStr Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_short Worldwide Trends in Registering Real-World Studies at ClinicalTrials.gov: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
title_sort worldwide trends in registering real-world studies at clinicaltrials.gov: a cross-sectional analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065426/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37007912
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S402478
work_keys_str_mv AT liyuanxiao worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis
AT tianying worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis
AT peishufen worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis
AT xiebaoyuan worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis
AT xuxiaonan worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis
AT wangbin worldwidetrendsinregisteringrealworldstudiesatclinicaltrialsgovacrosssectionalanalysis