Cargando…

Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation with two media for in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two density gradient centrifugation media for retrieving spermatozoa from semen samples by evaluating the total motile sperm count (TMSC) and the percentage recovery. METHODS: Twenty-two men with different sperm counts participated in the study. The samples were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernandes, Nilma De Souza, Silva, Carla Grasiele Da, Panizzon, Gean Pier, Cerialle, Paula Motta Almodin, Câmara, Vânia Cibele Minguetti, Radaelli, Moacir Rafael, Almodin, Carlos Gilberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065782/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575660
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220008
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two density gradient centrifugation media for retrieving spermatozoa from semen samples by evaluating the total motile sperm count (TMSC) and the percentage recovery. METHODS: Twenty-two men with different sperm counts participated in the study. The samples were divided into two equal aliquots and processed using the commercial ISolate Sperm Separation Medium (Irvine Scientific, United States) and the GV Gradiente (IngáMed, Brazil). After separation, samples were counted and evaluated for motile sperm recovery. RESULTS: The mean TMSC in the fresh sample was 19.65±21.08 million/mL. After the ISolate separation the TMSC was 6.71±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente it was 6.27±6.82 million/mL. The percentage of motile spermatozoa recovered was 36.47%±21.61 for ISolate and 35.22%±21.24 for the GV Gradiente (p>0.05). The samples from 6 oligospermic patients (27%) were evaluated separately and the TMSC for ISolate was 4.83±2.92 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 4.16±3.12 million/mL (p=0.54). When evaluating only normospermic patient samples, the TMSC for ISolate was 9.05±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 8.47±6.79 million/mL (p=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in retrieving motile sperm using the GV Gradiente and the ISolate Separation Medium.