Cargando…
Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation with two media for in vitro fertilization
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two density gradient centrifugation media for retrieving spermatozoa from semen samples by evaluating the total motile sperm count (TMSC) and the percentage recovery. METHODS: Twenty-two men with different sperm counts participated in the study. The samples were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575660 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220008 |
_version_ | 1785018177239908352 |
---|---|
author | Fernandes, Nilma De Souza Silva, Carla Grasiele Da Panizzon, Gean Pier Cerialle, Paula Motta Almodin Câmara, Vânia Cibele Minguetti Radaelli, Moacir Rafael Almodin, Carlos Gilberto |
author_facet | Fernandes, Nilma De Souza Silva, Carla Grasiele Da Panizzon, Gean Pier Cerialle, Paula Motta Almodin Câmara, Vânia Cibele Minguetti Radaelli, Moacir Rafael Almodin, Carlos Gilberto |
author_sort | Fernandes, Nilma De Souza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two density gradient centrifugation media for retrieving spermatozoa from semen samples by evaluating the total motile sperm count (TMSC) and the percentage recovery. METHODS: Twenty-two men with different sperm counts participated in the study. The samples were divided into two equal aliquots and processed using the commercial ISolate Sperm Separation Medium (Irvine Scientific, United States) and the GV Gradiente (IngáMed, Brazil). After separation, samples were counted and evaluated for motile sperm recovery. RESULTS: The mean TMSC in the fresh sample was 19.65±21.08 million/mL. After the ISolate separation the TMSC was 6.71±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente it was 6.27±6.82 million/mL. The percentage of motile spermatozoa recovered was 36.47%±21.61 for ISolate and 35.22%±21.24 for the GV Gradiente (p>0.05). The samples from 6 oligospermic patients (27%) were evaluated separately and the TMSC for ISolate was 4.83±2.92 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 4.16±3.12 million/mL (p=0.54). When evaluating only normospermic patient samples, the TMSC for ISolate was 9.05±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 8.47±6.79 million/mL (p=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in retrieving motile sperm using the GV Gradiente and the ISolate Separation Medium. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10065782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100657822023-04-01 Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation with two media for in vitro fertilization Fernandes, Nilma De Souza Silva, Carla Grasiele Da Panizzon, Gean Pier Cerialle, Paula Motta Almodin Câmara, Vânia Cibele Minguetti Radaelli, Moacir Rafael Almodin, Carlos Gilberto JBRA Assist Reprod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two density gradient centrifugation media for retrieving spermatozoa from semen samples by evaluating the total motile sperm count (TMSC) and the percentage recovery. METHODS: Twenty-two men with different sperm counts participated in the study. The samples were divided into two equal aliquots and processed using the commercial ISolate Sperm Separation Medium (Irvine Scientific, United States) and the GV Gradiente (IngáMed, Brazil). After separation, samples were counted and evaluated for motile sperm recovery. RESULTS: The mean TMSC in the fresh sample was 19.65±21.08 million/mL. After the ISolate separation the TMSC was 6.71±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente it was 6.27±6.82 million/mL. The percentage of motile spermatozoa recovered was 36.47%±21.61 for ISolate and 35.22%±21.24 for the GV Gradiente (p>0.05). The samples from 6 oligospermic patients (27%) were evaluated separately and the TMSC for ISolate was 4.83±2.92 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 4.16±3.12 million/mL (p=0.54). When evaluating only normospermic patient samples, the TMSC for ISolate was 9.05±7.29 million/mL, and for the GV Gradiente, it was 8.47±6.79 million/mL (p=0.83). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in retrieving motile sperm using the GV Gradiente and the ISolate Separation Medium. Brazilian Society of Assisted Reproduction 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10065782/ /pubmed/35575660 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220008 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fernandes, Nilma De Souza Silva, Carla Grasiele Da Panizzon, Gean Pier Cerialle, Paula Motta Almodin Câmara, Vânia Cibele Minguetti Radaelli, Moacir Rafael Almodin, Carlos Gilberto Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title | Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title_full | Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title_fullStr | Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title_short | Comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
title_sort | comparative sperm recovery rate after density gradient centrifugation
with two media for in vitro fertilization |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575660 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20220008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandesnilmadesouza comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT silvacarlagrasieleda comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT panizzongeanpier comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT ceriallepaulamottaalmodin comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT camaravaniacibeleminguetti comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT radaellimoacirrafael comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization AT almodincarlosgilberto comparativespermrecoveryrateafterdensitygradientcentrifugationwithtwomediaforinvitrofertilization |