Cargando…

Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint

The escape trajectory (ET) of prey – measured as the angle relative to the predator’s approach path – plays a major role in avoiding predation. Previous geometric models predict a single ET; however, many species show highly variable ETs with multiple preferred directions. Although such a high ET va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawabata, Yuuki, Akada, Hideyuki, Shimatani, Ken-ichiro, Nishihara, Gregory Naoki, Kimura, Hibiki, Nishiumi, Nozomi, Domenici, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790147
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77699
_version_ 1785018181807505408
author Kawabata, Yuuki
Akada, Hideyuki
Shimatani, Ken-ichiro
Nishihara, Gregory Naoki
Kimura, Hibiki
Nishiumi, Nozomi
Domenici, Paolo
author_facet Kawabata, Yuuki
Akada, Hideyuki
Shimatani, Ken-ichiro
Nishihara, Gregory Naoki
Kimura, Hibiki
Nishiumi, Nozomi
Domenici, Paolo
author_sort Kawabata, Yuuki
collection PubMed
description The escape trajectory (ET) of prey – measured as the angle relative to the predator’s approach path – plays a major role in avoiding predation. Previous geometric models predict a single ET; however, many species show highly variable ETs with multiple preferred directions. Although such a high ET variability may confer unpredictability to avoid predation, the reasons why animals prefer specific multiple ETs remain unclear. Here, we constructed a novel geometric model that incorporates the time required for prey to turn and the predator’s position at the end of its attack. The optimal ET was determined by maximizing the time difference of arrival at the edge of the safety zone between the prey and predator. By fitting the model to the experimental data of fish Pagrus major, we show that the model can clearly explain the observed multiple preferred ETs. By changing the parameters of the same model within a realistic range, we were able to produce various patterns of ETs empirically observed in other species (e.g., insects and frogs): a single preferred ET and multiple preferred ETs at small (20–50°) and large (150–180°) angles from the predator. Our results open new avenues of investigation for understanding how animals choose their ETs from behavioral and neurosensory perspectives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10065801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100658012023-04-01 Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint Kawabata, Yuuki Akada, Hideyuki Shimatani, Ken-ichiro Nishihara, Gregory Naoki Kimura, Hibiki Nishiumi, Nozomi Domenici, Paolo eLife Ecology The escape trajectory (ET) of prey – measured as the angle relative to the predator’s approach path – plays a major role in avoiding predation. Previous geometric models predict a single ET; however, many species show highly variable ETs with multiple preferred directions. Although such a high ET variability may confer unpredictability to avoid predation, the reasons why animals prefer specific multiple ETs remain unclear. Here, we constructed a novel geometric model that incorporates the time required for prey to turn and the predator’s position at the end of its attack. The optimal ET was determined by maximizing the time difference of arrival at the edge of the safety zone between the prey and predator. By fitting the model to the experimental data of fish Pagrus major, we show that the model can clearly explain the observed multiple preferred ETs. By changing the parameters of the same model within a realistic range, we were able to produce various patterns of ETs empirically observed in other species (e.g., insects and frogs): a single preferred ET and multiple preferred ETs at small (20–50°) and large (150–180°) angles from the predator. Our results open new avenues of investigation for understanding how animals choose their ETs from behavioral and neurosensory perspectives. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10065801/ /pubmed/36790147 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77699 Text en © 2023, Kawabata et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Ecology
Kawabata, Yuuki
Akada, Hideyuki
Shimatani, Ken-ichiro
Nishihara, Gregory Naoki
Kimura, Hibiki
Nishiumi, Nozomi
Domenici, Paolo
Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title_full Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title_fullStr Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title_full_unstemmed Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title_short Multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
title_sort multiple preferred escape trajectories are explained by a geometric model incorporating prey’s turn and predator attack endpoint
topic Ecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10065801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36790147
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77699
work_keys_str_mv AT kawabatayuuki multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT akadahideyuki multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT shimatanikenichiro multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT nishiharagregorynaoki multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT kimurahibiki multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT nishiuminozomi multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint
AT domenicipaolo multiplepreferredescapetrajectoriesareexplainedbyageometricmodelincorporatingpreysturnandpredatorattackendpoint