Cargando…
FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer
PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common postoperative consequences in head and neck cancer patients. Above all, these patients often suffer from aspiration and limitations of oral intake. However, no reliable dysphagia screening is available for this target group. This study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6 |
_version_ | 1785018231441850368 |
---|---|
author | Hey, Christiane Goeze, Almut Sader, Robert Zaretsky, Eugen |
author_facet | Hey, Christiane Goeze, Almut Sader, Robert Zaretsky, Eugen |
author_sort | Hey, Christiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common postoperative consequences in head and neck cancer patients. Above all, these patients often suffer from aspiration and limitations of oral intake. However, no reliable dysphagia screening is available for this target group. This study aimed to develop and validate a screening, FraMaDySc, based on a water swallow test (WST) for the identification of postsurgical patients with a risk of aspiration, limitations of oral intake, and, as their derivate, a relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia in general (OD) that constituted the main reference standard. METHODS: A total of 184 postsurgical head and neck cancer patients were tested with a WST. The patients were, on average, 62 years old and predominantly male (71%). After WST, they underwent Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES(®)). FEES(®) results were dichotomized by Penetration aspiration scale and Functional oral intake scale. Patients with a “fail” result on one of these two scales were classified as having OD. Quality criteria of WST were quantified by means of cross-tabulation with FEES(®) results. RESULTS: OD was found in 65% of patients, aspiration in 44%, limitations of oral intake in 56%. WST delivered a “fail” result in 65% of patients. WST showed sensitivity 91% and specificity 88% for OD. Quality criteria for aspiration (sensitivity 64%, specificity 93%) and limitations of oral intake (sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%) were lower. CONCLUSION: FraMaDySc is a standardized, quick, and valid WST and therefore an excellent screening tool for the identification of OD in postoperative head and neck cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10066133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100661332023-04-02 FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer Hey, Christiane Goeze, Almut Sader, Robert Zaretsky, Eugen Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is one of the most common postoperative consequences in head and neck cancer patients. Above all, these patients often suffer from aspiration and limitations of oral intake. However, no reliable dysphagia screening is available for this target group. This study aimed to develop and validate a screening, FraMaDySc, based on a water swallow test (WST) for the identification of postsurgical patients with a risk of aspiration, limitations of oral intake, and, as their derivate, a relevant oropharyngeal dysphagia in general (OD) that constituted the main reference standard. METHODS: A total of 184 postsurgical head and neck cancer patients were tested with a WST. The patients were, on average, 62 years old and predominantly male (71%). After WST, they underwent Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES(®)). FEES(®) results were dichotomized by Penetration aspiration scale and Functional oral intake scale. Patients with a “fail” result on one of these two scales were classified as having OD. Quality criteria of WST were quantified by means of cross-tabulation with FEES(®) results. RESULTS: OD was found in 65% of patients, aspiration in 44%, limitations of oral intake in 56%. WST delivered a “fail” result in 65% of patients. WST showed sensitivity 91% and specificity 88% for OD. Quality criteria for aspiration (sensitivity 64%, specificity 93%) and limitations of oral intake (sensitivity 80%, specificity 87%) were lower. CONCLUSION: FraMaDySc is a standardized, quick, and valid WST and therefore an excellent screening tool for the identification of OD in postoperative head and neck cancer patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10066133/ /pubmed/36786927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Head and Neck Hey, Christiane Goeze, Almut Sader, Robert Zaretsky, Eugen FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title | FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title_full | FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title_fullStr | FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title_short | FraMaDySc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
title_sort | framadysc: dysphagia screening for patients after surgery for head and neck cancer |
topic | Head and Neck |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07865-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heychristiane framadyscdysphagiascreeningforpatientsaftersurgeryforheadandneckcancer AT goezealmut framadyscdysphagiascreeningforpatientsaftersurgeryforheadandneckcancer AT saderrobert framadyscdysphagiascreeningforpatientsaftersurgeryforheadandneckcancer AT zaretskyeugen framadyscdysphagiascreeningforpatientsaftersurgeryforheadandneckcancer |