Cargando…

A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics

The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyne, Christopher T., Liu, Miron F., Rovey, Joshua L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y
_version_ 1785018236591407104
author Lyne, Christopher T.
Liu, Miron F.
Rovey, Joshua L.
author_facet Lyne, Christopher T.
Liu, Miron F.
Rovey, Joshua L.
author_sort Lyne, Christopher T.
collection PubMed
description The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100661562023-04-02 A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics Lyne, Christopher T. Liu, Miron F. Rovey, Joshua L. J Elect Propuls Research The time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ToF-MS) is a useful tool for quantifying the performance of electrospray thrusters and characterizing their plumes. ToF-MS data can be used to calculate the mass-to-charge distribution in the plume, but the kinetic-energy-to-charge (i.e., the potential) distribution must be known first. Here we use a ToF-MS in tandem with a retarding potential (RP) analyzer. By sweeping the retarding potential through the range of potentials present in the plume, both the mass-to-charge distribution and the potential distribution can be measured independently. We demonstrate this technique in a case study using a capillary electrospray emitter and the ionic liquid propellant 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide, abbreviated EMI-Im. We report a linear correlation between retarding potential and mass-to-charge ratio that agrees with published data from more complex orthogonal RP/ToF-MS instruments. Calculated values for the jet velocity and jet breakup potential match within 2% and 12%, respectively. Using conventional ToF-MS, we estimated the propellant flow rate and compared those estimates to direct flow rate measurements. For flow rates between 233 pL/s and 565 pL/s, the error in ToF-based flow rate estimates ranged from -16% to -13% when the plume potential was assumed to be a function of mass-to-charge. Assuming a constant plume potential yielded mixed results. However, using the average stopping potential measured by a retarding potential analyzer resulted in higher errors, ranging from -26% to -30%. Data and MATLAB code are included as supplemental materials so that readers can easily apply the techniques described here. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-31 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10066156/ /pubmed/37016724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Lyne, Christopher T.
Liu, Miron F.
Rovey, Joshua L.
A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title_full A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title_fullStr A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title_short A simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
title_sort simple retarding-potential time-of-flight mass spectrometer for electrospray propulsion diagnostics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37016724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s44205-023-00045-y
work_keys_str_mv AT lynechristophert asimpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics
AT liumironf asimpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics
AT roveyjoshual asimpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics
AT lynechristophert simpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics
AT liumironf simpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics
AT roveyjoshual simpleretardingpotentialtimeofflightmassspectrometerforelectrospraypropulsiondiagnostics