Cargando…
Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations
Discriminating relevant from irrelevant information in a busy visual scene is supported by statistical regularities in the environment. However, it is unclear to what extent immediate stimulus repetitions and higher order expectations (whether a repetition is statistically probable or not) are suppo...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02617-w |
_version_ | 1785018238327848960 |
---|---|
author | Noonan, M. P. Von Lautz, A. H. Bauer, Y. Summerfield, C. Stokes, M. S. |
author_facet | Noonan, M. P. Von Lautz, A. H. Bauer, Y. Summerfield, C. Stokes, M. S. |
author_sort | Noonan, M. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Discriminating relevant from irrelevant information in a busy visual scene is supported by statistical regularities in the environment. However, it is unclear to what extent immediate stimulus repetitions and higher order expectations (whether a repetition is statistically probable or not) are supported by the same neural mechanisms. Moreover, it is also unclear whether target and distractor-related processing are mediated by the same or different underlying neural mechanisms. Using a speeded target discrimination task, the present study implicitly cued subjects to the location of the target or the distractor via manipulations in the underlying stimulus predictability. In separate studies, we collected EEG and MEG alongside behavioural data. Results showed that reaction times were reduced with increased expectations for both types of stimuli and that these effects were driven by expected repetitions in both cases. Despite the similar behavioural pattern across target and distractors, neurophysiological measures distinguished the two stimuli. Specifically, the amplitude of the P1 was modulated by stimulus relevance, being reduced for repeated distractors and increased for repeated targets. The P1 was not, however, modulated by higher order stimulus expectations. These expectations were instead reflected in modulations in ERP amplitude and theta power in frontocentral electrodes. Finally, we observed that a single repetition of a distractor was sufficient to reduce decodability of stimulus spatial location and was also accompanied by diminished representation of stimulus features. Our results highlight the unique mechanisms involved in distractor expectation and suppression and underline the importance of studying these processes distinctly from target-related attentional control. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02617-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10066164 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100661642023-04-02 Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations Noonan, M. P. Von Lautz, A. H. Bauer, Y. Summerfield, C. Stokes, M. S. Atten Percept Psychophys Article Discriminating relevant from irrelevant information in a busy visual scene is supported by statistical regularities in the environment. However, it is unclear to what extent immediate stimulus repetitions and higher order expectations (whether a repetition is statistically probable or not) are supported by the same neural mechanisms. Moreover, it is also unclear whether target and distractor-related processing are mediated by the same or different underlying neural mechanisms. Using a speeded target discrimination task, the present study implicitly cued subjects to the location of the target or the distractor via manipulations in the underlying stimulus predictability. In separate studies, we collected EEG and MEG alongside behavioural data. Results showed that reaction times were reduced with increased expectations for both types of stimuli and that these effects were driven by expected repetitions in both cases. Despite the similar behavioural pattern across target and distractors, neurophysiological measures distinguished the two stimuli. Specifically, the amplitude of the P1 was modulated by stimulus relevance, being reduced for repeated distractors and increased for repeated targets. The P1 was not, however, modulated by higher order stimulus expectations. These expectations were instead reflected in modulations in ERP amplitude and theta power in frontocentral electrodes. Finally, we observed that a single repetition of a distractor was sufficient to reduce decodability of stimulus spatial location and was also accompanied by diminished representation of stimulus features. Our results highlight the unique mechanisms involved in distractor expectation and suppression and underline the importance of studying these processes distinctly from target-related attentional control. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-022-02617-w. Springer US 2022-12-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10066164/ /pubmed/36460926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02617-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Noonan, M. P. Von Lautz, A. H. Bauer, Y. Summerfield, C. Stokes, M. S. Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title | Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title_full | Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title_fullStr | Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title_short | Differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
title_sort | differential modulation of visual responses by distractor or target expectations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066164/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36460926 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-022-02617-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noonanmp differentialmodulationofvisualresponsesbydistractorortargetexpectations AT vonlautzah differentialmodulationofvisualresponsesbydistractorortargetexpectations AT bauery differentialmodulationofvisualresponsesbydistractorortargetexpectations AT summerfieldc differentialmodulationofvisualresponsesbydistractorortargetexpectations AT stokesms differentialmodulationofvisualresponsesbydistractorortargetexpectations |