Cargando…

Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage

Working memory is inherently limited, which makes it important to select and maintain only task-relevant information and to protect it from distraction. Previous research has suggested the contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha oscillations as neural candidates for such a prioritiz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schroeder, Svea C. Y., Aagten-Murphy, David, Busch, Niko A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w
_version_ 1785018239310364672
author Schroeder, Svea C. Y.
Aagten-Murphy, David
Busch, Niko A.
author_facet Schroeder, Svea C. Y.
Aagten-Murphy, David
Busch, Niko A.
author_sort Schroeder, Svea C. Y.
collection PubMed
description Working memory is inherently limited, which makes it important to select and maintain only task-relevant information and to protect it from distraction. Previous research has suggested the contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha oscillations as neural candidates for such a prioritization process. While most of this work focused on distraction during encoding, we examined the effect of external distraction presented during memory maintenance. Participants memorized the orientations of three lateralized objects. After an initial distraction-free maintenance interval, distractors appeared in the same location as the targets or in the opposite hemifield. This distraction was followed by another distraction-free interval. Our results show that CDA amplitudes were stronger in the interval before compared with the interval after the distraction (i.e., CDA amplitudes were stronger in response to targets compared with distractors). This amplitude reduction in response to distractors was more pronounced in participants with higher memory accuracy, indicating prioritization and maintenance of relevant over irrelevant information. In contrast, alpha lateralization did not change from the interval before distraction compared with the interval after distraction, and we found no correlation between alpha lateralization and memory accuracy. These results suggest that alpha lateralization plays no direct role in either selective maintenance of task-relevant information or inhibition of distractors. Instead, alpha lateralization reflects the current allocation of spatial attention to the most salient information regardless of task-relevance. In contrast, CDA indicates flexible allocation of working memory resources depending on task-relevance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100661682023-04-02 Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage Schroeder, Svea C. Y. Aagten-Murphy, David Busch, Niko A. Atten Percept Psychophys Article Working memory is inherently limited, which makes it important to select and maintain only task-relevant information and to protect it from distraction. Previous research has suggested the contralateral delay activity (CDA) and lateralized alpha oscillations as neural candidates for such a prioritization process. While most of this work focused on distraction during encoding, we examined the effect of external distraction presented during memory maintenance. Participants memorized the orientations of three lateralized objects. After an initial distraction-free maintenance interval, distractors appeared in the same location as the targets or in the opposite hemifield. This distraction was followed by another distraction-free interval. Our results show that CDA amplitudes were stronger in the interval before compared with the interval after the distraction (i.e., CDA amplitudes were stronger in response to targets compared with distractors). This amplitude reduction in response to distractors was more pronounced in participants with higher memory accuracy, indicating prioritization and maintenance of relevant over irrelevant information. In contrast, alpha lateralization did not change from the interval before distraction compared with the interval after distraction, and we found no correlation between alpha lateralization and memory accuracy. These results suggest that alpha lateralization plays no direct role in either selective maintenance of task-relevant information or inhibition of distractors. Instead, alpha lateralization reflects the current allocation of spatial attention to the most salient information regardless of task-relevance. In contrast, CDA indicates flexible allocation of working memory resources depending on task-relevance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w. Springer US 2023-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10066168/ /pubmed/36917354 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schroeder, Svea C. Y.
Aagten-Murphy, David
Busch, Niko A.
Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title_full Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title_fullStr Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title_full_unstemmed Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title_short Contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
title_sort contralateral delay activity, but not alpha lateralization, indexes prioritization of information for working memory storage
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917354
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-023-02681-w
work_keys_str_mv AT schroedersveacy contralateraldelayactivitybutnotalphalateralizationindexesprioritizationofinformationforworkingmemorystorage
AT aagtenmurphydavid contralateraldelayactivitybutnotalphalateralizationindexesprioritizationofinformationforworkingmemorystorage
AT buschnikoa contralateraldelayactivitybutnotalphalateralizationindexesprioritizationofinformationforworkingmemorystorage