Cargando…

Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea

Failure to rescue (FTR), the mortality rate among patients with complications, is gaining attention as a hospital quality indicator. However, comprehensive investigation into FTR has rarely been conducted after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to assess FTR after rad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sung Hyun, Kim, Ki-Yoon, Cho, Minah, Kim, Yoo Min, Hyung, Woo Jin, Kim, Hyoung-Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32593-6
_version_ 1785018243884253184
author Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Ki-Yoon
Cho, Minah
Kim, Yoo Min
Hyung, Woo Jin
Kim, Hyoung-Il
author_facet Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Ki-Yoon
Cho, Minah
Kim, Yoo Min
Hyung, Woo Jin
Kim, Hyoung-Il
author_sort Park, Sung Hyun
collection PubMed
description Failure to rescue (FTR), the mortality rate among patients with complications, is gaining attention as a hospital quality indicator. However, comprehensive investigation into FTR has rarely been conducted after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to assess FTR after radical gastrectomy and investigate the associations between FTR and clinicopathologic factors, operative features, and complication types. From 2006 to 2021, 16,851 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence and risk factors were analyzed for complications, mortality, and FTR. Seventy-six patients had postoperative mortality among 15,984 patients after exclusion. The overall morbidity rate was 10.49% (1676/15,984 = 10.49%), and the FTR rate was 4.53% (76/1676). Risk factor analysis revealed that older age (reference: < 60; vs. 60–79, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–3.79, P = 0.019; vs. ≥ 80, OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.57–8.91, P = 0.003), high ASA score (vs. 1 or 2, OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.59–4.91, P < 0.001), and serosa exposure in pathologic T stage (vs. T1, OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.51–4.97, P < 0.001) were associated with FTR. Moreover, patients who underwent gastrectomy during 2016–2021 were less likely to die when complications occurred than patients who received the surgery in 2006–2010 (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.68, P = 0.002). This investigation of FTR after gastrectomy demonstrated that the risk factors for FTR were old age, high ASA score, serosa exposure, and operation period. FTR varied according to the complication types and the period, even in the same institution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100661952023-04-02 Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Ki-Yoon Cho, Minah Kim, Yoo Min Hyung, Woo Jin Kim, Hyoung-Il Sci Rep Article Failure to rescue (FTR), the mortality rate among patients with complications, is gaining attention as a hospital quality indicator. However, comprehensive investigation into FTR has rarely been conducted after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. This study aimed to assess FTR after radical gastrectomy and investigate the associations between FTR and clinicopathologic factors, operative features, and complication types. From 2006 to 2021, 16,851 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence and risk factors were analyzed for complications, mortality, and FTR. Seventy-six patients had postoperative mortality among 15,984 patients after exclusion. The overall morbidity rate was 10.49% (1676/15,984 = 10.49%), and the FTR rate was 4.53% (76/1676). Risk factor analysis revealed that older age (reference: < 60; vs. 60–79, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–3.79, P = 0.019; vs. ≥ 80, OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.57–8.91, P = 0.003), high ASA score (vs. 1 or 2, OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.59–4.91, P < 0.001), and serosa exposure in pathologic T stage (vs. T1, OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.51–4.97, P < 0.001) were associated with FTR. Moreover, patients who underwent gastrectomy during 2016–2021 were less likely to die when complications occurred than patients who received the surgery in 2006–2010 (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.68, P = 0.002). This investigation of FTR after gastrectomy demonstrated that the risk factors for FTR were old age, high ASA score, serosa exposure, and operation period. FTR varied according to the complication types and the period, even in the same institution. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10066195/ /pubmed/37002330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32593-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Ki-Yoon
Cho, Minah
Kim, Yoo Min
Hyung, Woo Jin
Kim, Hyoung-Il
Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title_full Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title_fullStr Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title_short Changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in Korea
title_sort changes in failure to rescue after gastrectomy at a large-volume center with a 16-year experience in korea
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37002330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32593-6
work_keys_str_mv AT parksunghyun changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea
AT kimkiyoon changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea
AT chominah changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea
AT kimyoomin changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea
AT hyungwoojin changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea
AT kimhyoungil changesinfailuretorescueaftergastrectomyatalargevolumecenterwitha16yearexperienceinkorea