Cargando…

Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy

BACKGROUND: To date, no study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of palbociclib (PAL) plus fulvestrant (FUL) vs ribociclib (RIB) plus FUL and abemaciclib (ABM) plus FUL in Italy. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the three cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors in combination with endocrine therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo, Valentino, Maria Chiara, Fabi, Alessandra, Dieci, Maria Vittoria, Caruggi, Mauro, Bruno, Giacomo Matteo, Lombardi, Gloria, Di Matteo, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013197
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S391769
_version_ 1785018318527135744
author Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo
Valentino, Maria Chiara
Fabi, Alessandra
Dieci, Maria Vittoria
Caruggi, Mauro
Bruno, Giacomo Matteo
Lombardi, Gloria
Di Matteo, Sergio
author_facet Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo
Valentino, Maria Chiara
Fabi, Alessandra
Dieci, Maria Vittoria
Caruggi, Mauro
Bruno, Giacomo Matteo
Lombardi, Gloria
Di Matteo, Sergio
author_sort Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, no study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of palbociclib (PAL) plus fulvestrant (FUL) vs ribociclib (RIB) plus FUL and abemaciclib (ABM) plus FUL in Italy. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the three cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapies for the management of postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Italy was developed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To assess the cost-effectiveness of PAL plus FUL vs RIB plus FUL and ABM plus FUL, a cost-minimization has been carried out with a conservative scenario considering three CDK4/6 inhibitors with equal effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS) (MAIC, Rugo et al 2021). Adverse events (AEs) associated with all therapies were obtained from clinical trials. Ad-hoc analysis was performed to estimate the cost-effectiveness considering the quality-of-life (QoL) data (Lloyd et al 2006). RESULTS: Cost-minimization inputs were drugs, visits and exams, AE monitoring and best supportive care (BSC) before the progression state, active and BSC in the progression and terminal phase of the last two weeks of life. Given the comparability of PAL, RIB and ABM in terms of efficacy, this analysis demonstrated slight economic savings over a lifetime for PAL. Results showed saving per patient of €305 (lifetime) when PAL is compared with RIB; for PAL vs ABM a saving of €243 (lifetime) in a conservative scenario. Results of a budget impact analysis showed a potential savings of €319,563 for PAL vs RIB and €297,544 for PAL vs ABM. When QoL data were considered, results may favor PAL due to the lower impact of AE with savings and improvement in the QoL related to fewer AE. CONCLUSION: From the Italian perspective, a cost-saving profile associated with the use of PAL+FUL for the management of advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer compared to RIB+FUL and ABM+FUL emerged.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100667012023-04-02 Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo Valentino, Maria Chiara Fabi, Alessandra Dieci, Maria Vittoria Caruggi, Mauro Bruno, Giacomo Matteo Lombardi, Gloria Di Matteo, Sergio Ther Clin Risk Manag Original Research BACKGROUND: To date, no study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of palbociclib (PAL) plus fulvestrant (FUL) vs ribociclib (RIB) plus FUL and abemaciclib (ABM) plus FUL in Italy. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the three cyclin-dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapies for the management of postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Italy was developed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To assess the cost-effectiveness of PAL plus FUL vs RIB plus FUL and ABM plus FUL, a cost-minimization has been carried out with a conservative scenario considering three CDK4/6 inhibitors with equal effectiveness in terms of overall survival (OS) (MAIC, Rugo et al 2021). Adverse events (AEs) associated with all therapies were obtained from clinical trials. Ad-hoc analysis was performed to estimate the cost-effectiveness considering the quality-of-life (QoL) data (Lloyd et al 2006). RESULTS: Cost-minimization inputs were drugs, visits and exams, AE monitoring and best supportive care (BSC) before the progression state, active and BSC in the progression and terminal phase of the last two weeks of life. Given the comparability of PAL, RIB and ABM in terms of efficacy, this analysis demonstrated slight economic savings over a lifetime for PAL. Results showed saving per patient of €305 (lifetime) when PAL is compared with RIB; for PAL vs ABM a saving of €243 (lifetime) in a conservative scenario. Results of a budget impact analysis showed a potential savings of €319,563 for PAL vs RIB and €297,544 for PAL vs ABM. When QoL data were considered, results may favor PAL due to the lower impact of AE with savings and improvement in the QoL related to fewer AE. CONCLUSION: From the Italian perspective, a cost-saving profile associated with the use of PAL+FUL for the management of advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer compared to RIB+FUL and ABM+FUL emerged. Dove 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10066701/ /pubmed/37013197 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S391769 Text en © 2023 Colombo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Colombo, Giorgio Lorenzo
Valentino, Maria Chiara
Fabi, Alessandra
Dieci, Maria Vittoria
Caruggi, Mauro
Bruno, Giacomo Matteo
Lombardi, Gloria
Di Matteo, Sergio
Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title_full Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title_short Economic Evaluation for Palbociclib Plus Fulvestrant vs Ribociclib Plus Fulvestrant and Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Endocrine-Resistant Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Italy
title_sort economic evaluation for palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs ribociclib plus fulvestrant and abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in endocrine-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer in italy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013197
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S391769
work_keys_str_mv AT colombogiorgiolorenzo economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT valentinomariachiara economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT fabialessandra economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT diecimariavittoria economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT caruggimauro economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT brunogiacomomatteo economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT lombardigloria economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly
AT dimatteosergio economicevaluationforpalbociclibplusfulvestrantvsribociclibplusfulvestrantandabemaciclibplusfulvestrantinendocrineresistantadvancedormetastaticbreastcancerinitaly