Cargando…

Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan

PURPOSE: Biospecimen repositories and big data generated from clinical research are critically important in advancing patient-centered healthcare. However, ethical considerations arising from reusing clinical samples and health records for subsequent research pose a hurdle for big-data health resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Shami, Kamal M, Ahmed, Wesam S, Alzoubi, Karem H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013082
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S402769
_version_ 1785018323426082816
author Al-Shami, Kamal M
Ahmed, Wesam S
Alzoubi, Karem H
author_facet Al-Shami, Kamal M
Ahmed, Wesam S
Alzoubi, Karem H
author_sort Al-Shami, Kamal M
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Biospecimen repositories and big data generated from clinical research are critically important in advancing patient-centered healthcare. However, ethical considerations arising from reusing clinical samples and health records for subsequent research pose a hurdle for big-data health research. This study aims to assess the public’s opinions in Jordan toward providing blanket consent for using biospecimens and health records in research. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-reported questionnaire was carried out in different cities in Jordan, targeting adult participants. Outcome variables included awareness of clinical research, participation in clinical research, and opinions toward providing open access to clinical samples and records for research purposes. Descriptive analysis was utilized for reporting the outcome as frequency (percentages) out of the total responses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the association between independent variables and the outcome of interest. RESULTS: A total of 1033 eligible participants completed the questionnaire. Although the majority (90%) were aware of clinical research, only 24% have ever participated in this type of research. About half (51%) agreed on providing blanket consent for the use of clinical samples, while a lower percentage (43%) agreed on providing open access to their health records. Privacy concerns and lack of trust in the researcher were cited as major barriers to providing blanket consent. Participation in clinical research and having health insurance were predictors for providing open access to clinical samples and records. CONCLUSION: The lack of public trust in Jordan toward data privacy is evident from this study. Therefore, a governance framework is needed to raise and maintain the public’s trust in big-data research that warrants the future reuse of clinical samples and records. As such, the current study provides valuable insights that will inform the design of effective consent protocols required in data-intensive health research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100667302023-04-02 Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan Al-Shami, Kamal M Ahmed, Wesam S Alzoubi, Karem H Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: Biospecimen repositories and big data generated from clinical research are critically important in advancing patient-centered healthcare. However, ethical considerations arising from reusing clinical samples and health records for subsequent research pose a hurdle for big-data health research. This study aims to assess the public’s opinions in Jordan toward providing blanket consent for using biospecimens and health records in research. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study utilizing a self-reported questionnaire was carried out in different cities in Jordan, targeting adult participants. Outcome variables included awareness of clinical research, participation in clinical research, and opinions toward providing open access to clinical samples and records for research purposes. Descriptive analysis was utilized for reporting the outcome as frequency (percentages) out of the total responses. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to investigate the association between independent variables and the outcome of interest. RESULTS: A total of 1033 eligible participants completed the questionnaire. Although the majority (90%) were aware of clinical research, only 24% have ever participated in this type of research. About half (51%) agreed on providing blanket consent for the use of clinical samples, while a lower percentage (43%) agreed on providing open access to their health records. Privacy concerns and lack of trust in the researcher were cited as major barriers to providing blanket consent. Participation in clinical research and having health insurance were predictors for providing open access to clinical samples and records. CONCLUSION: The lack of public trust in Jordan toward data privacy is evident from this study. Therefore, a governance framework is needed to raise and maintain the public’s trust in big-data research that warrants the future reuse of clinical samples and records. As such, the current study provides valuable insights that will inform the design of effective consent protocols required in data-intensive health research. Dove 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10066730/ /pubmed/37013082 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S402769 Text en © 2023 Al-Shami et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Al-Shami, Kamal M
Ahmed, Wesam S
Alzoubi, Karem H
Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title_full Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title_fullStr Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title_full_unstemmed Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title_short Attitudes Toward Providing Open Access for Use of Biospecimens and Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jordan
title_sort attitudes toward providing open access for use of biospecimens and health records: a cross-sectional study from jordan
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013082
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S402769
work_keys_str_mv AT alshamikamalm attitudestowardprovidingopenaccessforuseofbiospecimensandhealthrecordsacrosssectionalstudyfromjordan
AT ahmedwesams attitudestowardprovidingopenaccessforuseofbiospecimensandhealthrecordsacrosssectionalstudyfromjordan
AT alzoubikaremh attitudestowardprovidingopenaccessforuseofbiospecimensandhealthrecordsacrosssectionalstudyfromjordan