Cargando…
Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012967 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695 |
_version_ | 1785018324595245056 |
---|---|
author | Stambaugh, Cassandra Yancey, Jessica Shukla, Utkarsh Melhus, Christopher Stambaugh, Nathaniel |
author_facet | Stambaugh, Cassandra Yancey, Jessica Shukla, Utkarsh Melhus, Christopher Stambaugh, Nathaniel |
author_sort | Stambaugh, Cassandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for three months. Task Group report 142 (TG-142) compliant daily QA included dosimetry checks (four photon, four electron beams); imaging checks (planar kilovolt (kV) & megavolt (MV), kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)); and mechanical and safety checks using SunCHECK Machine (SCM) (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA). Additionally, Machine Performance Check (MPC) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was performed for all energies. Four trained radiation therapists performed daily QA on both platforms. Data were collected to identify the time required to complete both SCM and MPC. Additionally, the two platforms were evaluated on usability and features. Output results were compared to our monthly standard to assess accuracy. Results On average, SCM took 22 minutes with a standard deviation of six minutes and MPC took 15 minutes with a standard deviation of three minutes. MPC output results were impacted due to the beam output being coupled to the beam profile changes. As a result, the two systems on average disagreed by -1.41% after three months despite being baselined at the same time point and output agreeing well initially (average difference of -0.1% across all energies). While there was overlap in the tests performed, SCM tests were more relevant to TG-142 while MPC tests were beneficial to machine service and, with a clear understanding of the limitations of the system, found suitable as a secondary backup to SCM for daily output verification. Conclusions This work demonstrates that a comprehensive TG-142 daily QA can be designed using SCM and MPC can be added as a beneficial tool and backup for output verification while still maintaining an efficient daily QA process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10066746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100667462023-04-02 Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check Stambaugh, Cassandra Yancey, Jessica Shukla, Utkarsh Melhus, Christopher Stambaugh, Nathaniel Cureus Medical Physics Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for three months. Task Group report 142 (TG-142) compliant daily QA included dosimetry checks (four photon, four electron beams); imaging checks (planar kilovolt (kV) & megavolt (MV), kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)); and mechanical and safety checks using SunCHECK Machine (SCM) (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA). Additionally, Machine Performance Check (MPC) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was performed for all energies. Four trained radiation therapists performed daily QA on both platforms. Data were collected to identify the time required to complete both SCM and MPC. Additionally, the two platforms were evaluated on usability and features. Output results were compared to our monthly standard to assess accuracy. Results On average, SCM took 22 minutes with a standard deviation of six minutes and MPC took 15 minutes with a standard deviation of three minutes. MPC output results were impacted due to the beam output being coupled to the beam profile changes. As a result, the two systems on average disagreed by -1.41% after three months despite being baselined at the same time point and output agreeing well initially (average difference of -0.1% across all energies). While there was overlap in the tests performed, SCM tests were more relevant to TG-142 while MPC tests were beneficial to machine service and, with a clear understanding of the limitations of the system, found suitable as a secondary backup to SCM for daily output verification. Conclusions This work demonstrates that a comprehensive TG-142 daily QA can be designed using SCM and MPC can be added as a beneficial tool and backup for output verification while still maintaining an efficient daily QA process. Cureus 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10066746/ /pubmed/37012967 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695 Text en Copyright © 2023, Stambaugh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Physics Stambaugh, Cassandra Yancey, Jessica Shukla, Utkarsh Melhus, Christopher Stambaugh, Nathaniel Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title | Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title_full | Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title_fullStr | Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title_full_unstemmed | Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title_short | Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check |
title_sort | daily quality assurance efficiency evaluation using suncheck machine and machine performance check |
topic | Medical Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012967 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stambaughcassandra dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck AT yanceyjessica dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck AT shuklautkarsh dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck AT melhuschristopher dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck AT stambaughnathaniel dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck |