Cargando…

Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check

Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods  Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stambaugh, Cassandra, Yancey, Jessica, Shukla, Utkarsh, Melhus, Christopher, Stambaugh, Nathaniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012967
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695
_version_ 1785018324595245056
author Stambaugh, Cassandra
Yancey, Jessica
Shukla, Utkarsh
Melhus, Christopher
Stambaugh, Nathaniel
author_facet Stambaugh, Cassandra
Yancey, Jessica
Shukla, Utkarsh
Melhus, Christopher
Stambaugh, Nathaniel
author_sort Stambaugh, Cassandra
collection PubMed
description Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods  Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for three months. Task Group report 142 (TG-142) compliant daily QA included dosimetry checks (four photon, four electron beams); imaging checks (planar kilovolt (kV) & megavolt (MV), kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)); and mechanical and safety checks using SunCHECK Machine (SCM) (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA). Additionally, Machine Performance Check (MPC) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was performed for all energies. Four trained radiation therapists performed daily QA on both platforms. Data were collected to identify the time required to complete both SCM and MPC. Additionally, the two platforms were evaluated on usability and features. Output results were compared to our monthly standard to assess accuracy. Results On average, SCM took 22 minutes with a standard deviation of six minutes and MPC took 15 minutes with a standard deviation of three minutes. MPC output results were impacted due to the beam output being coupled to the beam profile changes. As a result, the two systems on average disagreed by -1.41% after three months despite being baselined at the same time point and output agreeing well initially (average difference of -0.1% across all energies). While there was overlap in the tests performed, SCM tests were more relevant to TG-142 while MPC tests were beneficial to machine service and, with a clear understanding of the limitations of the system, found suitable as a secondary backup to SCM for daily output verification. Conclusions  This work demonstrates that a comprehensive TG-142 daily QA can be designed using SCM and MPC can be added as a beneficial tool and backup for output verification while still maintaining an efficient daily QA process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100667462023-04-02 Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check Stambaugh, Cassandra Yancey, Jessica Shukla, Utkarsh Melhus, Christopher Stambaugh, Nathaniel Cureus Medical Physics Purpose To investigate time efficiency, applicability, and accuracy of using a web-based, independent quality assurance (QA) platform and vendor-dependent based system check for daily linear accelerator (LINAC) QA. Methods  Time needed to perform daily QA on a single (n=1) LINAC was collected for three months. Task Group report 142 (TG-142) compliant daily QA included dosimetry checks (four photon, four electron beams); imaging checks (planar kilovolt (kV) & megavolt (MV), kV cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)); and mechanical and safety checks using SunCHECK Machine (SCM) (Sun Nuclear Inc., Melbourne, FL, USA). Additionally, Machine Performance Check (MPC) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) was performed for all energies. Four trained radiation therapists performed daily QA on both platforms. Data were collected to identify the time required to complete both SCM and MPC. Additionally, the two platforms were evaluated on usability and features. Output results were compared to our monthly standard to assess accuracy. Results On average, SCM took 22 minutes with a standard deviation of six minutes and MPC took 15 minutes with a standard deviation of three minutes. MPC output results were impacted due to the beam output being coupled to the beam profile changes. As a result, the two systems on average disagreed by -1.41% after three months despite being baselined at the same time point and output agreeing well initially (average difference of -0.1% across all energies). While there was overlap in the tests performed, SCM tests were more relevant to TG-142 while MPC tests were beneficial to machine service and, with a clear understanding of the limitations of the system, found suitable as a secondary backup to SCM for daily output verification. Conclusions  This work demonstrates that a comprehensive TG-142 daily QA can be designed using SCM and MPC can be added as a beneficial tool and backup for output verification while still maintaining an efficient daily QA process. Cureus 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10066746/ /pubmed/37012967 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695 Text en Copyright © 2023, Stambaugh et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Physics
Stambaugh, Cassandra
Yancey, Jessica
Shukla, Utkarsh
Melhus, Christopher
Stambaugh, Nathaniel
Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title_full Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title_fullStr Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title_full_unstemmed Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title_short Daily Quality Assurance Efficiency Evaluation Using SunCHECK Machine and Machine Performance Check
title_sort daily quality assurance efficiency evaluation using suncheck machine and machine performance check
topic Medical Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37012967
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35695
work_keys_str_mv AT stambaughcassandra dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck
AT yanceyjessica dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck
AT shuklautkarsh dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck
AT melhuschristopher dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck
AT stambaughnathaniel dailyqualityassuranceefficiencyevaluationusingsuncheckmachineandmachineperformancecheck