Cargando…

Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis

AIMS: Levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine secreted in response to cellular stress and inflammation, have been associated with multiple types of cardiovascular (CV) events. However, its comparative prognostic performance across different presentations of atherosclerotic ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Eri Toda, Morrow, David A, Guo, Jianping, Berg, David D, Blazing, Michael A, Bohula, Erin A, Bonaca, Marc P, Cannon, Christopher P, de Lemos, James A, Giugliano, Robert P, Jarolim, Petr, Kempf, Tibor, Kristin Newby, L, O’Donoghue, Michelle L, Pfeffer, Marc A, Rifai, Nader, Wiviott, Stephen D, Wollert, Kai C, Braunwald, Eugene, Sabatine, Marc S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac577
_version_ 1785018324836417536
author Kato, Eri Toda
Morrow, David A
Guo, Jianping
Berg, David D
Blazing, Michael A
Bohula, Erin A
Bonaca, Marc P
Cannon, Christopher P
de Lemos, James A
Giugliano, Robert P
Jarolim, Petr
Kempf, Tibor
Kristin Newby, L
O’Donoghue, Michelle L
Pfeffer, Marc A
Rifai, Nader
Wiviott, Stephen D
Wollert, Kai C
Braunwald, Eugene
Sabatine, Marc S
author_facet Kato, Eri Toda
Morrow, David A
Guo, Jianping
Berg, David D
Blazing, Michael A
Bohula, Erin A
Bonaca, Marc P
Cannon, Christopher P
de Lemos, James A
Giugliano, Robert P
Jarolim, Petr
Kempf, Tibor
Kristin Newby, L
O’Donoghue, Michelle L
Pfeffer, Marc A
Rifai, Nader
Wiviott, Stephen D
Wollert, Kai C
Braunwald, Eugene
Sabatine, Marc S
author_sort Kato, Eri Toda
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine secreted in response to cellular stress and inflammation, have been associated with multiple types of cardiovascular (CV) events. However, its comparative prognostic performance across different presentations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: An individual patient meta-analysis was performed using data pooled from eight trials including 53 486 patients. Baseline GDF-15 concentration was analyzed as a continuous variable and using established cutpoints (<1200 ng/L, 1200–1800 ng/L, > 1800 ng/L) to evaluate its prognostic performance for CV death/hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and their components using Cox models adjusted for clinical variables and established CV biomarkers. Analyses were further stratified on ASCVD status: acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stabilized after recent ACS, and stable ASCVD. Overall, higher GDF-15 concentration was significantly and independently associated with an increased rate of CV death/HHF and MACE (P < 0.001 for each). However, while GDF-15 showed a robust and consistent independent association with CV death and HHF across all presentations of ASCVD, its prognostic association with future myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke only remained significant in patients stabilized after recent ACS or with stable ASCVD [hazard ratio (HR): 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–1.31 and HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05–1.28 for MI and stroke, respectively] and not in ACS (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.90–1.06 and HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.39–1.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: Growth differentiation factor 15 consistently adds prognostic information for CV death and HHF across the spectrum of ASCVD. GDF-15 also adds prognostic information for MI and stroke beyond clinical risk factors and cardiac biomarkers but not in the setting of ACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100667472023-04-02 Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis Kato, Eri Toda Morrow, David A Guo, Jianping Berg, David D Blazing, Michael A Bohula, Erin A Bonaca, Marc P Cannon, Christopher P de Lemos, James A Giugliano, Robert P Jarolim, Petr Kempf, Tibor Kristin Newby, L O’Donoghue, Michelle L Pfeffer, Marc A Rifai, Nader Wiviott, Stephen D Wollert, Kai C Braunwald, Eugene Sabatine, Marc S Eur Heart J Clinical Research AIMS: Levels of growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine secreted in response to cellular stress and inflammation, have been associated with multiple types of cardiovascular (CV) events. However, its comparative prognostic performance across different presentations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: An individual patient meta-analysis was performed using data pooled from eight trials including 53 486 patients. Baseline GDF-15 concentration was analyzed as a continuous variable and using established cutpoints (<1200 ng/L, 1200–1800 ng/L, > 1800 ng/L) to evaluate its prognostic performance for CV death/hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and their components using Cox models adjusted for clinical variables and established CV biomarkers. Analyses were further stratified on ASCVD status: acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stabilized after recent ACS, and stable ASCVD. Overall, higher GDF-15 concentration was significantly and independently associated with an increased rate of CV death/HHF and MACE (P < 0.001 for each). However, while GDF-15 showed a robust and consistent independent association with CV death and HHF across all presentations of ASCVD, its prognostic association with future myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke only remained significant in patients stabilized after recent ACS or with stable ASCVD [hazard ratio (HR): 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.17–1.31 and HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.05–1.28 for MI and stroke, respectively] and not in ACS (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.90–1.06 and HR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.39–1.92, respectively). CONCLUSION: Growth differentiation factor 15 consistently adds prognostic information for CV death and HHF across the spectrum of ASCVD. GDF-15 also adds prognostic information for MI and stroke beyond clinical risk factors and cardiac biomarkers but not in the setting of ACS. Oxford University Press 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10066747/ /pubmed/36303404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac577 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kato, Eri Toda
Morrow, David A
Guo, Jianping
Berg, David D
Blazing, Michael A
Bohula, Erin A
Bonaca, Marc P
Cannon, Christopher P
de Lemos, James A
Giugliano, Robert P
Jarolim, Petr
Kempf, Tibor
Kristin Newby, L
O’Donoghue, Michelle L
Pfeffer, Marc A
Rifai, Nader
Wiviott, Stephen D
Wollert, Kai C
Braunwald, Eugene
Sabatine, Marc S
Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title_full Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title_fullStr Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title_short Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
title_sort growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular risk: individual patient meta-analysis
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36303404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac577
work_keys_str_mv AT katoeritoda growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT morrowdavida growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT guojianping growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT bergdavidd growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT blazingmichaela growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT bohulaerina growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT bonacamarcp growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT cannonchristopherp growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT delemosjamesa growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT giuglianorobertp growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT jarolimpetr growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT kempftibor growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT kristinnewbyl growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT odonoghuemichellel growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT pfeffermarca growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT rifainader growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT wiviottstephend growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT wollertkaic growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT braunwaldeugene growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis
AT sabatinemarcs growthdifferentiationfactor15andcardiovascularriskindividualpatientmetaanalysis