Far From Home: The Role of Travel Distance and Care Fragmentation in Surgical Outcomes for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND: Fragmented care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is known to correlate negatively with outcomes, but it is unclear which aspects of care fragmentation are relevant and potentially modifiable. Furthermore, there is little data on the relationship between travel distance and the benefits of integrated care models. Hypothesizing care coordination in the preoperative period may have a significant impact on surgical outcomes, we explored associations between integrated care, travel distance, and surgical outcomes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing index abdominal surgery was done to compare the rate of surgical complications with and without long travel distance and nonintegrated preoperative care. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with complications. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-seven patients were included. Complications were more common among patients with travel distance >75 miles (47.6% vs 27.4%, P = .012). Integrated preoperative care was not significant on bivariate (P = .381) or multivariable analysis but had a stronger association among patients with travel distance <75 miles (20.9% integrated vs 36.7%, P = .138). After adjustment, new ileostomy, open surgical approach, and distance >75 miles were independently associated with complications. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with longer travel distances to the hospital were twice as likely to have a surgical complication after adjusting for other risk factors. Without significant accommodations for remote patients, potential benefits of an integrated model for IBD care may be limited to patients who live close to the medical center. Future efforts addressing continuity of care should consider tactics to mitigate the impact of travel distance on outcomes.