Cargando…

Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) could provide a better balance of benefits and harms. We developed BC-Predict, to offer women when invited to the NHSBSP, which collects standard risk factor information; mammographic density; and in a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gareth Evans, D., McWilliams, Lorna, Astley, Susan, Brentnall, Adam R., Cuzick, Jack, Dobrashian, Richard, Duffy, Stephen W., Gorman, Louise S., Harkness, Elaine F., Harrison, Fiona, Harvie, Michelle, Jerrison, Andrew, Machin, Matthew, Maxwell, Anthony J., Howell, Sacha J., Wright, Stuart J., Payne, Katherine, Qureshi, Nadeem, Ruane, Helen, Southworth, Jake, Fox, Lynne, Bowers, Sarah, Hutchinson, Gillian, Thorpe, Emma, Ulph, Fiona, Woof, Victoria, Howell, Anthony, French, David P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02250-w
_version_ 1785018355781992448
author Gareth Evans, D.
McWilliams, Lorna
Astley, Susan
Brentnall, Adam R.
Cuzick, Jack
Dobrashian, Richard
Duffy, Stephen W.
Gorman, Louise S.
Harkness, Elaine F.
Harrison, Fiona
Harvie, Michelle
Jerrison, Andrew
Machin, Matthew
Maxwell, Anthony J.
Howell, Sacha J.
Wright, Stuart J.
Payne, Katherine
Qureshi, Nadeem
Ruane, Helen
Southworth, Jake
Fox, Lynne
Bowers, Sarah
Hutchinson, Gillian
Thorpe, Emma
Ulph, Fiona
Woof, Victoria
Howell, Anthony
French, David P.
author_facet Gareth Evans, D.
McWilliams, Lorna
Astley, Susan
Brentnall, Adam R.
Cuzick, Jack
Dobrashian, Richard
Duffy, Stephen W.
Gorman, Louise S.
Harkness, Elaine F.
Harrison, Fiona
Harvie, Michelle
Jerrison, Andrew
Machin, Matthew
Maxwell, Anthony J.
Howell, Sacha J.
Wright, Stuart J.
Payne, Katherine
Qureshi, Nadeem
Ruane, Helen
Southworth, Jake
Fox, Lynne
Bowers, Sarah
Hutchinson, Gillian
Thorpe, Emma
Ulph, Fiona
Woof, Victoria
Howell, Anthony
French, David P.
author_sort Gareth Evans, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) could provide a better balance of benefits and harms. We developed BC-Predict, to offer women when invited to the NHSBSP, which collects standard risk factor information; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS). METHODS: Risk prediction was estimated primarily from self-reported questionnaires and mammographic density using the Tyrer–Cuzick risk model. Women eligible for NHSBSP were recruited. BC-Predict produced risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5–<8% 10-year) to have appointments to discuss prevention and additional screening. RESULTS: Overall uptake of BC-Predict in screening attendees was 16.9% with 2472 consenting to the study; 76.8% of those received risk feedback within the 8-week timeframe. Recruitment was 63.2% with an onsite recruiter and paper questionnaire compared to <10% with BC-Predict only (P < 0.0001). Risk appointment attendance was highest for those at high risk (40.6%); 77.5% of those opted for preventive medication. DISCUSSION: We have shown that a real-time offer of breast cancer risk information (including both mammographic density and PRS) is feasible and can be delivered in reasonable time, although uptake requires personal contact. Preventive medication uptake in women newly identified at high risk is high and could improve the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10066938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100669382023-04-03 Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420) Gareth Evans, D. McWilliams, Lorna Astley, Susan Brentnall, Adam R. Cuzick, Jack Dobrashian, Richard Duffy, Stephen W. Gorman, Louise S. Harkness, Elaine F. Harrison, Fiona Harvie, Michelle Jerrison, Andrew Machin, Matthew Maxwell, Anthony J. Howell, Sacha J. Wright, Stuart J. Payne, Katherine Qureshi, Nadeem Ruane, Helen Southworth, Jake Fox, Lynne Bowers, Sarah Hutchinson, Gillian Thorpe, Emma Ulph, Fiona Woof, Victoria Howell, Anthony French, David P. Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Risk stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) could provide a better balance of benefits and harms. We developed BC-Predict, to offer women when invited to the NHSBSP, which collects standard risk factor information; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS). METHODS: Risk prediction was estimated primarily from self-reported questionnaires and mammographic density using the Tyrer–Cuzick risk model. Women eligible for NHSBSP were recruited. BC-Predict produced risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5–<8% 10-year) to have appointments to discuss prevention and additional screening. RESULTS: Overall uptake of BC-Predict in screening attendees was 16.9% with 2472 consenting to the study; 76.8% of those received risk feedback within the 8-week timeframe. Recruitment was 63.2% with an onsite recruiter and paper questionnaire compared to <10% with BC-Predict only (P < 0.0001). Risk appointment attendance was highest for those at high risk (40.6%); 77.5% of those opted for preventive medication. DISCUSSION: We have shown that a real-time offer of breast cancer risk information (including both mammographic density and PRS) is feasible and can be delivered in reasonable time, although uptake requires personal contact. Preventive medication uptake in women newly identified at high risk is high and could improve the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-01 2023-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10066938/ /pubmed/37005486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02250-w Text en © The Authors 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gareth Evans, D.
McWilliams, Lorna
Astley, Susan
Brentnall, Adam R.
Cuzick, Jack
Dobrashian, Richard
Duffy, Stephen W.
Gorman, Louise S.
Harkness, Elaine F.
Harrison, Fiona
Harvie, Michelle
Jerrison, Andrew
Machin, Matthew
Maxwell, Anthony J.
Howell, Sacha J.
Wright, Stuart J.
Payne, Katherine
Qureshi, Nadeem
Ruane, Helen
Southworth, Jake
Fox, Lynne
Bowers, Sarah
Hutchinson, Gillian
Thorpe, Emma
Ulph, Fiona
Woof, Victoria
Howell, Anthony
French, David P.
Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title_full Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title_fullStr Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title_short Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)
title_sort quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the bc-predict non-randomised controlled study (nct04359420)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-023-02250-w
work_keys_str_mv AT garethevansd quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT mcwilliamslorna quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT astleysusan quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT brentnalladamr quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT cuzickjack quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT dobrashianrichard quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT duffystephenw quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT gormanlouises quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT harknesselainef quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT harrisonfiona quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT harviemichelle quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT jerrisonandrew quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT machinmatthew quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT maxwellanthonyj quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT howellsachaj quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT wrightstuartj quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT paynekatherine quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT qureshinadeem quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT ruanehelen quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT southworthjake quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT foxlynne quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT bowerssarah quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT hutchinsongillian quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT thorpeemma quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT ulphfiona quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT woofvictoria quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT howellanthony quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420
AT frenchdavidp quantifyingtheeffectsofriskstratifiedbreastcancerscreeningwhendeliveredinrealtimeasroutinepracticeversususualscreeningthebcpredictnonrandomisedcontrolledstudynct04359420