Cargando…
The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice
BACKGROUND: Australia's inequitable distribution of health services is well documented. Spatial access relates to the geographic limitations affecting the availability and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and services. Issues associated with spatial access are often influenced by Austr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09342-6 |
_version_ | 1785018364711665664 |
---|---|
author | Wood, Sarah M. Alston, Laura Beks, Hannah Mc Namara, Kevin Coffee, Neil T. Clark, Robyn A. Wong Shee, Anna Versace, Vincent L. |
author_facet | Wood, Sarah M. Alston, Laura Beks, Hannah Mc Namara, Kevin Coffee, Neil T. Clark, Robyn A. Wong Shee, Anna Versace, Vincent L. |
author_sort | Wood, Sarah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Australia's inequitable distribution of health services is well documented. Spatial access relates to the geographic limitations affecting the availability and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and services. Issues associated with spatial access are often influenced by Australia's vast landmass, challenging environments, uneven population concentration, and sparsely distributed populations in rural and remote areas. Measuring access contributes to a broader understanding of the performance of health systems, particularly in rural/remote areas. This systematic review synthesises the evidence identifying what spatial measures and geographic classifications are used and how they are applied in the Australian peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 2002 and 2022 was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Search terms were derived from three major topics, including: [1] Australian population; [2] spatial analysis of health service accessibility; and [3] objective physical access measures. RESULTS: Database searches retrieved 1,381 unique records. Records were screened for eligibility, resulting in 82 articles for inclusion. Most articles analysed access to primary health services (n = 50; 61%), followed by specialist care (n = 17; 21%), hospital services (n = 12; 15%), and health promotion and prevention (n = 3; 4%). The geographic scope of the 82 articles included national (n = 33; 40%), state (n = 27; 33%), metropolitan (n = 18; 22%), and specified regional / rural /remote area (n = 4; 5%). Most articles used distance-based physical access measures, including travel time (n = 30; 37%) and travel distance along a road network (n = 21; 26%), and Euclidean distance (n = 24; 29%). CONCLUSION: This review is the first comprehensive systematic review to synthesise the evidence on how spatial measures have been applied to measure health service accessibility in the Australian context over the past two decades. Objective and transparent access measures that are fit for purpose are imperative to address persistent health inequities and inform equitable resource distribution and evidence-based policymaking. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09342-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10066971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100669712023-04-03 The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice Wood, Sarah M. Alston, Laura Beks, Hannah Mc Namara, Kevin Coffee, Neil T. Clark, Robyn A. Wong Shee, Anna Versace, Vincent L. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Australia's inequitable distribution of health services is well documented. Spatial access relates to the geographic limitations affecting the availability and accessibility of healthcare practitioners and services. Issues associated with spatial access are often influenced by Australia's vast landmass, challenging environments, uneven population concentration, and sparsely distributed populations in rural and remote areas. Measuring access contributes to a broader understanding of the performance of health systems, particularly in rural/remote areas. This systematic review synthesises the evidence identifying what spatial measures and geographic classifications are used and how they are applied in the Australian peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: A systematic search of peer-reviewed literature published between 2002 and 2022 was undertaken using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Search terms were derived from three major topics, including: [1] Australian population; [2] spatial analysis of health service accessibility; and [3] objective physical access measures. RESULTS: Database searches retrieved 1,381 unique records. Records were screened for eligibility, resulting in 82 articles for inclusion. Most articles analysed access to primary health services (n = 50; 61%), followed by specialist care (n = 17; 21%), hospital services (n = 12; 15%), and health promotion and prevention (n = 3; 4%). The geographic scope of the 82 articles included national (n = 33; 40%), state (n = 27; 33%), metropolitan (n = 18; 22%), and specified regional / rural /remote area (n = 4; 5%). Most articles used distance-based physical access measures, including travel time (n = 30; 37%) and travel distance along a road network (n = 21; 26%), and Euclidean distance (n = 24; 29%). CONCLUSION: This review is the first comprehensive systematic review to synthesise the evidence on how spatial measures have been applied to measure health service accessibility in the Australian context over the past two decades. Objective and transparent access measures that are fit for purpose are imperative to address persistent health inequities and inform equitable resource distribution and evidence-based policymaking. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09342-6. BioMed Central 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10066971/ /pubmed/37005659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09342-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wood, Sarah M. Alston, Laura Beks, Hannah Mc Namara, Kevin Coffee, Neil T. Clark, Robyn A. Wong Shee, Anna Versace, Vincent L. The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title | The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_full | The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_fullStr | The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_full_unstemmed | The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_short | The application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in Australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
title_sort | application of spatial measures to analyse health service accessibility in australia: a systematic review and recommendations for future practice |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09342-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodsarahm theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT alstonlaura theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT bekshannah theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT mcnamarakevin theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT coffeeneilt theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT clarkrobyna theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT wongsheeanna theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT versacevincentl theapplicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT woodsarahm applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT alstonlaura applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT bekshannah applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT mcnamarakevin applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT coffeeneilt applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT clarkrobyna applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT wongsheeanna applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice AT versacevincentl applicationofspatialmeasurestoanalysehealthserviceaccessibilityinaustraliaasystematicreviewandrecommendationsforfuturepractice |