Cargando…

Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data

While experimental and informatic techniques around single cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) are advanced, research around mass cytometry (CyTOF) data analysis has severely lagged behind. CyTOF data are notably different from scRNA-seq data in many aspects. This calls for the evaluation and development of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kaiwen, Yang, Yuqiu, Wu, Fangjiang, Song, Bing, Wang, Xinlei, Wang, Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37478-w
_version_ 1785018375341080576
author Wang, Kaiwen
Yang, Yuqiu
Wu, Fangjiang
Song, Bing
Wang, Xinlei
Wang, Tao
author_facet Wang, Kaiwen
Yang, Yuqiu
Wu, Fangjiang
Song, Bing
Wang, Xinlei
Wang, Tao
author_sort Wang, Kaiwen
collection PubMed
description While experimental and informatic techniques around single cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) are advanced, research around mass cytometry (CyTOF) data analysis has severely lagged behind. CyTOF data are notably different from scRNA-seq data in many aspects. This calls for the evaluation and development of computational methods specific for CyTOF data. Dimension reduction (DR) is one of the critical steps of single cell data analysis. Here, we benchmark the performances of 21 DR methods on 110 real and 425 synthetic CyTOF samples. We find that less well-known methods like SAUCIE, SQuaD-MDS, and scvis are the overall best performers. In particular, SAUCIE and scvis are well balanced, SQuaD-MDS excels at structure preservation, whereas UMAP has great downstream analysis performance. We also find that t-SNE (along with SQuad-MDS/t-SNE Hybrid) possesses the best local structure preservation. Nevertheless, there is a high level of complementarity between these tools, so the choice of method should depend on the underlying data structure and the analytical needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100670132023-04-03 Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data Wang, Kaiwen Yang, Yuqiu Wu, Fangjiang Song, Bing Wang, Xinlei Wang, Tao Nat Commun Article While experimental and informatic techniques around single cell sequencing (scRNA-seq) are advanced, research around mass cytometry (CyTOF) data analysis has severely lagged behind. CyTOF data are notably different from scRNA-seq data in many aspects. This calls for the evaluation and development of computational methods specific for CyTOF data. Dimension reduction (DR) is one of the critical steps of single cell data analysis. Here, we benchmark the performances of 21 DR methods on 110 real and 425 synthetic CyTOF samples. We find that less well-known methods like SAUCIE, SQuaD-MDS, and scvis are the overall best performers. In particular, SAUCIE and scvis are well balanced, SQuaD-MDS excels at structure preservation, whereas UMAP has great downstream analysis performance. We also find that t-SNE (along with SQuad-MDS/t-SNE Hybrid) possesses the best local structure preservation. Nevertheless, there is a high level of complementarity between these tools, so the choice of method should depend on the underlying data structure and the analytical needs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10067013/ /pubmed/37005472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37478-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Kaiwen
Yang, Yuqiu
Wu, Fangjiang
Song, Bing
Wang, Xinlei
Wang, Tao
Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title_full Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title_short Comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
title_sort comparative analysis of dimension reduction methods for cytometry by time-of-flight data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37478-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkaiwen comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata
AT yangyuqiu comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata
AT wufangjiang comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata
AT songbing comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata
AT wangxinlei comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata
AT wangtao comparativeanalysisofdimensionreductionmethodsforcytometrybytimeofflightdata