Cargando…
Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node metastasis (LNM) indicators and to develop optimal prognostic nomograms for bladder cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: BC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5475 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node metastasis (LNM) indicators and to develop optimal prognostic nomograms for bladder cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: BC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015, and randomly partitioned into training and internal validation cohorts. Genomic and clinical data were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as external validation cohort. The predictive efficiency of LNM indicators was compared by constructing multivariate Cox regression models. We constructed nomograms on basis of the optimal models selected for overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS). The performance of nomograms was evaluated with calibration plot, time‐dependent area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) in three cohorts. We subsequently estimated the difference of biological function and tumor immunity between two risk groups stratified by nomograms in TCGA cohort. RESULTS: Totally, 10,093 and 107 BC patients were screened from the SEER and TCGA databases. N classification, positive lymph nodes (PLNs), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) were all independent predictors for OS and CSS. The filtered models containing LODDS had minimal Akaike Information Criterion, maximal concordance indexes and AUCs. Age, LODDS, T and M classification were integrated into nomogram for OS, while nomogram for CSS included gender, tumor grade, LODDS, T and M classification. The nomograms were successfully validated in predictive accuracy and clinical utility in three cohorts. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment was different between two risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: LODDS demonstrated superior prognostic performance over N classification, PLN and LNR for OS and CSS of BC patients. The nomograms incorporating LODDS provided appropriate prediction of BC, which could contribute to the tumor assessment and clinical decision‐making. |
---|