Cargando…

Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node metastasis (LNM) indicators and to develop optimal prognostic nomograms for bladder cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: BC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Shuai, Wang, Yicun, Hu, Xiaopeng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5475
_version_ 1785018378770972672
author Li, Shuai
Wang, Yicun
Hu, Xiaopeng
author_facet Li, Shuai
Wang, Yicun
Hu, Xiaopeng
author_sort Li, Shuai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node metastasis (LNM) indicators and to develop optimal prognostic nomograms for bladder cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: BC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015, and randomly partitioned into training and internal validation cohorts. Genomic and clinical data were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as external validation cohort. The predictive efficiency of LNM indicators was compared by constructing multivariate Cox regression models. We constructed nomograms on basis of the optimal models selected for overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS). The performance of nomograms was evaluated with calibration plot, time‐dependent area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) in three cohorts. We subsequently estimated the difference of biological function and tumor immunity between two risk groups stratified by nomograms in TCGA cohort. RESULTS: Totally, 10,093 and 107 BC patients were screened from the SEER and TCGA databases. N classification, positive lymph nodes (PLNs), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) were all independent predictors for OS and CSS. The filtered models containing LODDS had minimal Akaike Information Criterion, maximal concordance indexes and AUCs. Age, LODDS, T and M classification were integrated into nomogram for OS, while nomogram for CSS included gender, tumor grade, LODDS, T and M classification. The nomograms were successfully validated in predictive accuracy and clinical utility in three cohorts. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment was different between two risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: LODDS demonstrated superior prognostic performance over N classification, PLN and LNR for OS and CSS of BC patients. The nomograms incorporating LODDS provided appropriate prediction of BC, which could contribute to the tumor assessment and clinical decision‐making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100670302023-04-03 Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation Li, Shuai Wang, Yicun Hu, Xiaopeng Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node metastasis (LNM) indicators and to develop optimal prognostic nomograms for bladder cancer (BC) patients. METHODS: BC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2015, and randomly partitioned into training and internal validation cohorts. Genomic and clinical data were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) as external validation cohort. The predictive efficiency of LNM indicators was compared by constructing multivariate Cox regression models. We constructed nomograms on basis of the optimal models selected for overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS). The performance of nomograms was evaluated with calibration plot, time‐dependent area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) in three cohorts. We subsequently estimated the difference of biological function and tumor immunity between two risk groups stratified by nomograms in TCGA cohort. RESULTS: Totally, 10,093 and 107 BC patients were screened from the SEER and TCGA databases. N classification, positive lymph nodes (PLNs), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) were all independent predictors for OS and CSS. The filtered models containing LODDS had minimal Akaike Information Criterion, maximal concordance indexes and AUCs. Age, LODDS, T and M classification were integrated into nomogram for OS, while nomogram for CSS included gender, tumor grade, LODDS, T and M classification. The nomograms were successfully validated in predictive accuracy and clinical utility in three cohorts. Additionally, the tumor microenvironment was different between two risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: LODDS demonstrated superior prognostic performance over N classification, PLN and LNR for OS and CSS of BC patients. The nomograms incorporating LODDS provided appropriate prediction of BC, which could contribute to the tumor assessment and clinical decision‐making. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10067030/ /pubmed/36479835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5475 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Li, Shuai
Wang, Yicun
Hu, Xiaopeng
Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title_full Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title_fullStr Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title_short Prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: A SEER population‐based study and external validation
title_sort prognostic nomogram based on the lymph node metastasis indicators for patients with bladder cancer: a seer population‐based study and external validation
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36479835
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5475
work_keys_str_mv AT lishuai prognosticnomogrambasedonthelymphnodemetastasisindicatorsforpatientswithbladdercanceraseerpopulationbasedstudyandexternalvalidation
AT wangyicun prognosticnomogrambasedonthelymphnodemetastasisindicatorsforpatientswithbladdercanceraseerpopulationbasedstudyandexternalvalidation
AT huxiaopeng prognosticnomogrambasedonthelymphnodemetastasisindicatorsforpatientswithbladdercanceraseerpopulationbasedstudyandexternalvalidation