Cargando…
Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain informati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494 |
_version_ | 1785018393013780480 |
---|---|
author | Caballero, José María Gili, José María Pereira, Juan Camilo Gomáriz, Alba Castillo, Carlos Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat |
author_facet | Caballero, José María Gili, José María Pereira, Juan Camilo Gomáriz, Alba Castillo, Carlos Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat |
author_sort | Caballero, José María |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain information on their geographic areas involved, last dates of real incidence of BC, and rules coding used in BC for uncertain behavior, in situ and multiple tumors. METHODS: Using MEDLINE and Google Scholar, we identified scientific publications of in the last 10 years in English or Spanish, whether they were related to a national or international cancer registry, provided information on registry rules, and provided data on the incidence of BC. RESULTS: After the first screening, a total of 194 references were obtained. After a second analysis, three registries were selected: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is a world registry providing real incidence of BC in the period 2008–2012. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registered incidence until 2017 in more than 90% of the US population. Spanish Network of Cancer Registries (REDECAN) unifies 14 Spanish registries (27.4% of the population) with real incidence data from 2010 to 2015. The coding and inclusion rules have been modified, but currently, most registries include BC in situ and uncertain behavior tumors. Whenever a new case occurs 36 months after a previous diagnosis, SEER registers those as multiple incident cancers in the same location, while IARC and REDECAN only allow one cancer per location during the lifespan of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the incidence of BC among different population‐based cancer registries is prone to bias due to the methodological differences regarding the inclusion of carcinomas in situ, indeterminate, and multiple tumors. A good cancer registry could provide better surveillance strategies for BC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10067087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100670872023-04-03 Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences Caballero, José María Gili, José María Pereira, Juan Camilo Gomáriz, Alba Castillo, Carlos Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat Cancer Med REVIEWS BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain information on their geographic areas involved, last dates of real incidence of BC, and rules coding used in BC for uncertain behavior, in situ and multiple tumors. METHODS: Using MEDLINE and Google Scholar, we identified scientific publications of in the last 10 years in English or Spanish, whether they were related to a national or international cancer registry, provided information on registry rules, and provided data on the incidence of BC. RESULTS: After the first screening, a total of 194 references were obtained. After a second analysis, three registries were selected: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is a world registry providing real incidence of BC in the period 2008–2012. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registered incidence until 2017 in more than 90% of the US population. Spanish Network of Cancer Registries (REDECAN) unifies 14 Spanish registries (27.4% of the population) with real incidence data from 2010 to 2015. The coding and inclusion rules have been modified, but currently, most registries include BC in situ and uncertain behavior tumors. Whenever a new case occurs 36 months after a previous diagnosis, SEER registers those as multiple incident cancers in the same location, while IARC and REDECAN only allow one cancer per location during the lifespan of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the incidence of BC among different population‐based cancer registries is prone to bias due to the methodological differences regarding the inclusion of carcinomas in situ, indeterminate, and multiple tumors. A good cancer registry could provide better surveillance strategies for BC patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10067087/ /pubmed/36530046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | REVIEWS Caballero, José María Gili, José María Pereira, Juan Camilo Gomáriz, Alba Castillo, Carlos Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title | Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title_full | Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title_short | Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
title_sort | systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: how criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences |
topic | REVIEWS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caballerojosemaria systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences AT gilijosemaria systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences AT pereirajuancamilo systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences AT gomarizalba systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences AT castillocarlos systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences AT martinbaraneramontserrat systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences |