Cargando…

Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences

BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain informati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caballero, José María, Gili, José María, Pereira, Juan Camilo, Gomáriz, Alba, Castillo, Carlos, Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494
_version_ 1785018393013780480
author Caballero, José María
Gili, José María
Pereira, Juan Camilo
Gomáriz, Alba
Castillo, Carlos
Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat
author_facet Caballero, José María
Gili, José María
Pereira, Juan Camilo
Gomáriz, Alba
Castillo, Carlos
Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat
author_sort Caballero, José María
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain information on their geographic areas involved, last dates of real incidence of BC, and rules coding used in BC for uncertain behavior, in situ and multiple tumors. METHODS: Using MEDLINE and Google Scholar, we identified scientific publications of in the last 10 years in English or Spanish, whether they were related to a national or international cancer registry, provided information on registry rules, and provided data on the incidence of BC. RESULTS: After the first screening, a total of 194 references were obtained. After a second analysis, three registries were selected: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is a world registry providing real incidence of BC in the period 2008–2012. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registered incidence until 2017 in more than 90% of the US population. Spanish Network of Cancer Registries (REDECAN) unifies 14 Spanish registries (27.4% of the population) with real incidence data from 2010 to 2015. The coding and inclusion rules have been modified, but currently, most registries include BC in situ and uncertain behavior tumors. Whenever a new case occurs 36 months after a previous diagnosis, SEER registers those as multiple incident cancers in the same location, while IARC and REDECAN only allow one cancer per location during the lifespan of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the incidence of BC among different population‐based cancer registries is prone to bias due to the methodological differences regarding the inclusion of carcinomas in situ, indeterminate, and multiple tumors. A good cancer registry could provide better surveillance strategies for BC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100670872023-04-03 Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences Caballero, José María Gili, José María Pereira, Juan Camilo Gomáriz, Alba Castillo, Carlos Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat Cancer Med REVIEWS BACKGROUND: The population‐based registry of bladder cancer (BC) raises specific problems intrinsic to the tumor, as the inclusion of noninfiltrating, potentially malignant and multiple tumors. We performed a systematic review (PRISMA guidelines) of population‐based BC registries to obtain information on their geographic areas involved, last dates of real incidence of BC, and rules coding used in BC for uncertain behavior, in situ and multiple tumors. METHODS: Using MEDLINE and Google Scholar, we identified scientific publications of in the last 10 years in English or Spanish, whether they were related to a national or international cancer registry, provided information on registry rules, and provided data on the incidence of BC. RESULTS: After the first screening, a total of 194 references were obtained. After a second analysis, three registries were selected: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is a world registry providing real incidence of BC in the period 2008–2012. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registered incidence until 2017 in more than 90% of the US population. Spanish Network of Cancer Registries (REDECAN) unifies 14 Spanish registries (27.4% of the population) with real incidence data from 2010 to 2015. The coding and inclusion rules have been modified, but currently, most registries include BC in situ and uncertain behavior tumors. Whenever a new case occurs 36 months after a previous diagnosis, SEER registers those as multiple incident cancers in the same location, while IARC and REDECAN only allow one cancer per location during the lifespan of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the incidence of BC among different population‐based cancer registries is prone to bias due to the methodological differences regarding the inclusion of carcinomas in situ, indeterminate, and multiple tumors. A good cancer registry could provide better surveillance strategies for BC patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10067087/ /pubmed/36530046 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle REVIEWS
Caballero, José María
Gili, José María
Pereira, Juan Camilo
Gomáriz, Alba
Castillo, Carlos
Martín‐Baranera, Montserrat
Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title_full Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title_fullStr Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title_short Systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: How criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
title_sort systematic review of population‐based bladder cancer registries: how criteria heterogeneity affects the comparison of incidences
topic REVIEWS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36530046
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5494
work_keys_str_mv AT caballerojosemaria systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences
AT gilijosemaria systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences
AT pereirajuancamilo systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences
AT gomarizalba systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences
AT castillocarlos systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences
AT martinbaraneramontserrat systematicreviewofpopulationbasedbladdercancerregistrieshowcriteriaheterogeneityaffectsthecomparisonofincidences