Outcome and prognostic factors of unexpected ovarian carcinomas

BACKGROUND: We investigated risk factors influencing the outcome of unexpected ovarian carcinomas. METHODS: We reviewed the ovarian carcinoma patients treated at atertiary medical institution between 2000 and 2017 and analyze the clinico‐pathological characteristics, treatment strategies, recurrence status, and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 112 women (65 primary laparoscopic surgery [LSC] and 47 laparotomic surgery [LAPA]) were included in the analysis. The LSC group had smaller ovarian tumors (10.5 ± 7.3 cm vs. 16.6 ± 8.7 cm, p = 0.031) and higher incidence of subsequent staging surgery (56.9% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.0001) compared to the LAPA group. There were 98/112 (86.6%) of early stages (I/II) diseases. The difference between the recurrent rate (27.7% vs. 31.9%), disease‐free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were not significant among surgical groups. In the multivariate analysis, FIGO stage (stage II hazard ratio [HR] 6.61, p = 0.007; stage III HR 8.40, p = 0.002) was the only prognostic factor for DFS. FIGO stage (stage II HR 20.78, p = 0.0001; stage III HR 7.99, p = 0.017), histological type (mucinous HR 12.49, p = 0.036), and tumor grade (grade 3 HR 35.01, p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for OS, while women with latency >28 days from primary to staging surgery had significantly poorer OS (p = 0.008). Women with latency >28 days between primary surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy had similar DFS (p = 0.31) and a trend of poorer OS (p = 0.064). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of unexpected ovarian cancer is independent from the primary surgical procedure and comprehensive staging surgery should be performed at close proximity after the diagnosis of unexpected ovarian malignancy.