Cargando…

Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND: A surgical “Never Event” is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery’s characteristics. Our study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arad, Dana, Rosenfeld, Ariel, Magnezi, Racheli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00356-x
_version_ 1785018417570381824
author Arad, Dana
Rosenfeld, Ariel
Magnezi, Racheli
author_facet Arad, Dana
Rosenfeld, Ariel
Magnezi, Racheli
author_sort Arad, Dana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A surgical “Never Event” is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery’s characteristics. Our study uses machine learning to reveal and quantify risk factors with the goal of improving patient safety and quality of care. METHODS: We used data from 9,234 observations on safety standards and 101 root-cause analyses from actual, major “Never Events” including wrong site surgery and retained foreign item, and three random forest supervised machine learning models to identify risk factors. Using a standard 10-cross validation technique, we evaluated the models’ metrics, measuring their impact on the occurrence of the two types of Never Events through Gini impurity. RESULTS: We identified 24 contributing factors in six surgical departments: two had an impact of > 900% in Urology, Orthopedics, and General Surgery; six had an impact of 0–900% in Gynecology, Urology, and Cardiology; and 17 had an impact of < 0%. Combining factors revealed 15–20 pairs with an increased probability in five departments: Gynecology, 875–1900%; Urology, 1900–2600%; Cardiology, 833–1500%; Orthopedics,1825–4225%; and General Surgery, 2720–13,600%. Five factors affected wrong site surgery’s occurrence (-60.96 to 503.92%) and five affected retained foreign body (-74.65 to 151.43%): two nurses (66.26–87.92%), surgery length < 1 h (85.56–122.91%), and surgery length 1–2 h (-60.96 to 85.56%). CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning, we could quantify the risk factors’ potential impact on wrong site surgeries and retained foreign items in relation to a surgery’s characteristics, suggesting that safety standards should be adjusted to surgery’s characteristics based on risk assessment in each operating room. . TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MOH 032-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-023-00356-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067209
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100672092023-04-03 Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis Arad, Dana Rosenfeld, Ariel Magnezi, Racheli Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: A surgical “Never Event” is a preventable error occurring immediately before, during or immediately following surgery. Various factors contribute to the occurrence of major Never Events, but little is known about their quantified risk in relation to a surgery’s characteristics. Our study uses machine learning to reveal and quantify risk factors with the goal of improving patient safety and quality of care. METHODS: We used data from 9,234 observations on safety standards and 101 root-cause analyses from actual, major “Never Events” including wrong site surgery and retained foreign item, and three random forest supervised machine learning models to identify risk factors. Using a standard 10-cross validation technique, we evaluated the models’ metrics, measuring their impact on the occurrence of the two types of Never Events through Gini impurity. RESULTS: We identified 24 contributing factors in six surgical departments: two had an impact of > 900% in Urology, Orthopedics, and General Surgery; six had an impact of 0–900% in Gynecology, Urology, and Cardiology; and 17 had an impact of < 0%. Combining factors revealed 15–20 pairs with an increased probability in five departments: Gynecology, 875–1900%; Urology, 1900–2600%; Cardiology, 833–1500%; Orthopedics,1825–4225%; and General Surgery, 2720–13,600%. Five factors affected wrong site surgery’s occurrence (-60.96 to 503.92%) and five affected retained foreign body (-74.65 to 151.43%): two nurses (66.26–87.92%), surgery length < 1 h (85.56–122.91%), and surgery length 1–2 h (-60.96 to 85.56%). CONCLUSIONS: Using machine learning, we could quantify the risk factors’ potential impact on wrong site surgeries and retained foreign items in relation to a surgery’s characteristics, suggesting that safety standards should be adjusted to surgery’s characteristics based on risk assessment in each operating room. . TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: MOH 032-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13037-023-00356-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10067209/ /pubmed/37004090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00356-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Arad, Dana
Rosenfeld, Ariel
Magnezi, Racheli
Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title_full Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title_fullStr Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title_full_unstemmed Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title_short Factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
title_sort factors contributing to preventing operating room “never events”: a machine learning analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067209/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37004090
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00356-x
work_keys_str_mv AT araddana factorscontributingtopreventingoperatingroomnevereventsamachinelearninganalysis
AT rosenfeldariel factorscontributingtopreventingoperatingroomnevereventsamachinelearninganalysis
AT magneziracheli factorscontributingtopreventingoperatingroomnevereventsamachinelearninganalysis