Cargando…

Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is poorly understood. It is considered a benign disease but has histologic features of malignancy, such as local invasion or gene mutations. Moreover, it is not clear whether its invasive potential is comparable to that of adenomy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, A., Kommoss, K. F., Ortmann, H., Kirchner, M., Jauckus, J., Sinn, P., Strowitzki, T., Germeyer, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01083-9
_version_ 1785018420530511872
author Marshall, A.
Kommoss, K. F.
Ortmann, H.
Kirchner, M.
Jauckus, J.
Sinn, P.
Strowitzki, T.
Germeyer, A.
author_facet Marshall, A.
Kommoss, K. F.
Ortmann, H.
Kirchner, M.
Jauckus, J.
Sinn, P.
Strowitzki, T.
Germeyer, A.
author_sort Marshall, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is poorly understood. It is considered a benign disease but has histologic features of malignancy, such as local invasion or gene mutations. Moreover, it is not clear whether its invasive potential is comparable to that of adenomyosis uteri (FA), or whether it has a different biological background. Therefore, the aim of this study was to molecularly characterize the gene expression signatures of both diseases in order to gain insight into the common or different underlying pathomechanisms and to provide clues to pathomechanisms of tumor development based on these diseases. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples from two independent cohorts. One cohort involved 7 female patients with histologically confirmed FA, the other cohort 19 female patients with histologically confirmed DIE. The epithelium of both entities was microdissected in a laser-guided fashion and RNA was extracted. We analyzed the expression of 770 genes using the nCounter expression assay human PanCancer (Nanostring Technology). RESULTS: In total, 162 genes were identified to be significantly down-regulated (n = 46) or up-regulated (n = 116) in DIE (for log2-fold changes of < 0.66 or > 1.5 and an adjusted p-value of < 0.05) compared to FA. Gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis of increased gene expression in DIE compared to FA revealed significant overlap with genes upregulated in the PI3K pathway and focal adhesion signaling pathway as well as other solid cancer pathways. In FA, on the other hand, genes of the RAS pathway showed significant expression compared to DIE. CONCLUSION: DIE and FA differ significantly at the RNA expression level: in DIE the most expressed genes were those belonging to the PI3K pathway, and in FA those belonging to the RAS pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100672212023-04-03 Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways Marshall, A. Kommoss, K. F. Ortmann, H. Kirchner, M. Jauckus, J. Sinn, P. Strowitzki, T. Germeyer, A. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is poorly understood. It is considered a benign disease but has histologic features of malignancy, such as local invasion or gene mutations. Moreover, it is not clear whether its invasive potential is comparable to that of adenomyosis uteri (FA), or whether it has a different biological background. Therefore, the aim of this study was to molecularly characterize the gene expression signatures of both diseases in order to gain insight into the common or different underlying pathomechanisms and to provide clues to pathomechanisms of tumor development based on these diseases. METHODS: In this study, we analyzed formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples from two independent cohorts. One cohort involved 7 female patients with histologically confirmed FA, the other cohort 19 female patients with histologically confirmed DIE. The epithelium of both entities was microdissected in a laser-guided fashion and RNA was extracted. We analyzed the expression of 770 genes using the nCounter expression assay human PanCancer (Nanostring Technology). RESULTS: In total, 162 genes were identified to be significantly down-regulated (n = 46) or up-regulated (n = 116) in DIE (for log2-fold changes of < 0.66 or > 1.5 and an adjusted p-value of < 0.05) compared to FA. Gene ontology and KEGG pathway analysis of increased gene expression in DIE compared to FA revealed significant overlap with genes upregulated in the PI3K pathway and focal adhesion signaling pathway as well as other solid cancer pathways. In FA, on the other hand, genes of the RAS pathway showed significant expression compared to DIE. CONCLUSION: DIE and FA differ significantly at the RNA expression level: in DIE the most expressed genes were those belonging to the PI3K pathway, and in FA those belonging to the RAS pathway. BioMed Central 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10067221/ /pubmed/37005590 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01083-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Marshall, A.
Kommoss, K. F.
Ortmann, H.
Kirchner, M.
Jauckus, J.
Sinn, P.
Strowitzki, T.
Germeyer, A.
Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title_full Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title_fullStr Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title_full_unstemmed Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title_short Comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
title_sort comparing gene expression in deep infiltrating endometriosis with adenomyosis uteri: evidence for dysregulation of oncogene pathways
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005590
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01083-9
work_keys_str_mv AT marshalla comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT kommosskf comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT ortmannh comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT kirchnerm comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT jauckusj comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT sinnp comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT strowitzkit comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways
AT germeyera comparinggeneexpressionindeepinfiltratingendometriosiswithadenomyosisuterievidencefordysregulationofoncogenepathways