Cargando…

Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines

INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the quality of videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy on YouTube® using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. METHODS: YouTube was searched using the following keyword: “thoracoscopic sympathectomy” on August 22, 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adorisio, Ottavio, Davoli, Enrico, De Peppo, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37021089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124
_version_ 1785018498355822592
author Adorisio, Ottavio
Davoli, Enrico
De Peppo, Francesco
author_facet Adorisio, Ottavio
Davoli, Enrico
De Peppo, Francesco
author_sort Adorisio, Ottavio
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the quality of videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy on YouTube® using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. METHODS: YouTube was searched using the following keyword: “thoracoscopic sympathectomy” on August 22, 2021. The first 50 videos were analyzed and classified for baseline characteristics and conformity to the LAP-VEGaS checklist. RESULTS: Duration ranged from 19 s to 22 min. The mean number of likes was 14.8 (range 0–80). The mean number of dislikes was 2.5 (range 0–14). The mean number of comments was 8.5 (range 0–67). Nineteen videos did not meet our criteria and were excluded. Regarding the remaining 31 videos, none contained all 16 points of the LAP-VEGaS essential checklist (mean 5.4 points, range 2–14 points), with almost all neglecting preoperative information and outcomes. The mean percentage of conformity was 37% (range 12%–93%). The most viewed videos were not associated with higher conformity to LAP-VEGaS criteria showing only 4/16 points (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of videos addressing TS on YouTube®, based on the LAP-VEGaS checklist may be considered not acceptable. Experienced surgeons and surgeons in trainees should be aware of this when using it as a learning resource in their clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100675592023-04-04 Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines Adorisio, Ottavio Davoli, Enrico De Peppo, Francesco Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: The study aims to evaluate the quality of videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy on YouTube® using the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) criteria. METHODS: YouTube was searched using the following keyword: “thoracoscopic sympathectomy” on August 22, 2021. The first 50 videos were analyzed and classified for baseline characteristics and conformity to the LAP-VEGaS checklist. RESULTS: Duration ranged from 19 s to 22 min. The mean number of likes was 14.8 (range 0–80). The mean number of dislikes was 2.5 (range 0–14). The mean number of comments was 8.5 (range 0–67). Nineteen videos did not meet our criteria and were excluded. Regarding the remaining 31 videos, none contained all 16 points of the LAP-VEGaS essential checklist (mean 5.4 points, range 2–14 points), with almost all neglecting preoperative information and outcomes. The mean percentage of conformity was 37% (range 12%–93%). The most viewed videos were not associated with higher conformity to LAP-VEGaS criteria showing only 4/16 points (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The quality of videos addressing TS on YouTube®, based on the LAP-VEGaS checklist may be considered not acceptable. Experienced surgeons and surgeons in trainees should be aware of this when using it as a learning resource in their clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10067559/ /pubmed/37021089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124 Text en © 2023 Adorisio, Davoli and De Peppo. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Adorisio, Ottavio
Davoli, Enrico
De Peppo, Francesco
Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title_full Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title_fullStr Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title_short Evaluation of YouTube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines
title_sort evaluation of youtube videos addressing thoracoscopic sympathectomy using the lap-vegas guidelines
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37021089
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1133124
work_keys_str_mv AT adorisioottavio evaluationofyoutubevideosaddressingthoracoscopicsympathectomyusingthelapvegasguidelines
AT davolienrico evaluationofyoutubevideosaddressingthoracoscopicsympathectomyusingthelapvegasguidelines
AT depeppofrancesco evaluationofyoutubevideosaddressingthoracoscopicsympathectomyusingthelapvegasguidelines