Cargando…
Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping
Introduction: Several investigations have examined utilizing inertial measurement units (IMU) to estimate ground reaction force (GRF) during exercise. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of inertial measurement units location on the estimation of ground reaction force durin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1112866 |
_version_ | 1785018513139695616 |
---|---|
author | Kerns, Jordan A. Zwart, Andrew S. Perez, Pietro S. Gurchiek, Reed D. McBride, Jeffrey M. |
author_facet | Kerns, Jordan A. Zwart, Andrew S. Perez, Pietro S. Gurchiek, Reed D. McBride, Jeffrey M. |
author_sort | Kerns, Jordan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Several investigations have examined utilizing inertial measurement units (IMU) to estimate ground reaction force (GRF) during exercise. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of inertial measurement units location on the estimation of ground reaction force during vertical jumping. Methods: Eight male subjects completed a series of ten countermovement jumps on a force plate (FP). The subjects had an inertial measurement units attached to the sacrum, back and chest. Ground reaction force was estimated from data from the individual inertial measurement units and by using a two-segment model and combined sensor approach. Results: The peak ground reaction force values for the sacrum, back, chest and combined inertial measurement units were 1,792 ± 278 N, 1,850 ± 341 N, 2,054 ± 346 N and 1,812 ± 323 N, respectively. The sacral inertial measurement units achieved the smallest differences for ground reaction force estimates providing a root mean square error (RMSE) between 88 N and 360 N. The inertial measurement units on the sacrum also showed significant correlations in peak ground reaction force (p < 0.001) and average ground reaction force (p < 0.001) using the Bland-Altman 95% Limits of Agreement (LOA) when in comparison to the force plate. Discussion: Based on assessment of bias, Limits of Agreement, and RMSE, the inertial measurement units located on the sacrum appears to be the best placement to estimate both peak and average ground reaction force during jumping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10067619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100676192023-04-04 Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping Kerns, Jordan A. Zwart, Andrew S. Perez, Pietro S. Gurchiek, Reed D. McBride, Jeffrey M. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Introduction: Several investigations have examined utilizing inertial measurement units (IMU) to estimate ground reaction force (GRF) during exercise. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of inertial measurement units location on the estimation of ground reaction force during vertical jumping. Methods: Eight male subjects completed a series of ten countermovement jumps on a force plate (FP). The subjects had an inertial measurement units attached to the sacrum, back and chest. Ground reaction force was estimated from data from the individual inertial measurement units and by using a two-segment model and combined sensor approach. Results: The peak ground reaction force values for the sacrum, back, chest and combined inertial measurement units were 1,792 ± 278 N, 1,850 ± 341 N, 2,054 ± 346 N and 1,812 ± 323 N, respectively. The sacral inertial measurement units achieved the smallest differences for ground reaction force estimates providing a root mean square error (RMSE) between 88 N and 360 N. The inertial measurement units on the sacrum also showed significant correlations in peak ground reaction force (p < 0.001) and average ground reaction force (p < 0.001) using the Bland-Altman 95% Limits of Agreement (LOA) when in comparison to the force plate. Discussion: Based on assessment of bias, Limits of Agreement, and RMSE, the inertial measurement units located on the sacrum appears to be the best placement to estimate both peak and average ground reaction force during jumping. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10067619/ /pubmed/37020514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1112866 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kerns, Zwart, Perez, Gurchiek and McBride. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Kerns, Jordan A. Zwart, Andrew S. Perez, Pietro S. Gurchiek, Reed D. McBride, Jeffrey M. Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title | Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title_full | Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title_fullStr | Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title_short | Effect of IMU location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
title_sort | effect of imu location on estimation of vertical ground reaction force during jumping |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1112866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kernsjordana effectofimulocationonestimationofverticalgroundreactionforceduringjumping AT zwartandrews effectofimulocationonestimationofverticalgroundreactionforceduringjumping AT perezpietros effectofimulocationonestimationofverticalgroundreactionforceduringjumping AT gurchiekreedd effectofimulocationonestimationofverticalgroundreactionforceduringjumping AT mcbridejeffreym effectofimulocationonestimationofverticalgroundreactionforceduringjumping |