Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study

AIM: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) Pit and Fissure Sealant (PF sealants) with or without the use of a universal dental adhesive system Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive (SBU) using different bonding and curing protocols and to assess and compare t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swathy, RS, Naidu, Jaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020754
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2500
_version_ 1785018592952057856
author Swathy, RS
Naidu, Jaya
author_facet Swathy, RS
Naidu, Jaya
author_sort Swathy, RS
collection PubMed
description AIM: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) Pit and Fissure Sealant (PF sealants) with or without the use of a universal dental adhesive system Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive (SBU) using different bonding and curing protocols and to assess and compare the mode of failure as determined by visualization of the fractured surfaces of the test specimens after shear testing under an optical microscope at a magnification of 20×. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 85 samples were prepared for testing SBS on enamel on caries-free, extracted permanent human molars. The specimens were randomly divided into five groups based on different bonding and curing protocols. A knife-edge blade in a universal testing machine was used to perform the SBS test with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Then the mode of failure was assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test and Chi-squared test. A probability value 0.05 (p ≤ 0.01) was regarded as significant. RESULTS: Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive (SBU) in total-etch (TE) mode/etch-and-rinse (ER) mode with individual light curing of the sealant and adhesive showed the highest SBS to enamel (5.40 ± 2.51 MPa). A predominance of cohesive mode of failure was observed for all the test groups. CONCLUSION: Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application, with either curing mode, can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength to enhance sealant retention and efficacy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Swathy SR, Naidu J. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):48-53.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10067991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100679912023-04-04 A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study Swathy, RS Naidu, Jaya Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research AIM: To evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) Pit and Fissure Sealant (PF sealants) with or without the use of a universal dental adhesive system Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive (SBU) using different bonding and curing protocols and to assess and compare the mode of failure as determined by visualization of the fractured surfaces of the test specimens after shear testing under an optical microscope at a magnification of 20×. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 85 samples were prepared for testing SBS on enamel on caries-free, extracted permanent human molars. The specimens were randomly divided into five groups based on different bonding and curing protocols. A knife-edge blade in a universal testing machine was used to perform the SBS test with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Then the mode of failure was assessed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Results were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's post hoc test and Chi-squared test. A probability value 0.05 (p ≤ 0.01) was regarded as significant. RESULTS: Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive (SBU) in total-etch (TE) mode/etch-and-rinse (ER) mode with individual light curing of the sealant and adhesive showed the highest SBS to enamel (5.40 ± 2.51 MPa). A predominance of cohesive mode of failure was observed for all the test groups. CONCLUSION: Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application, with either curing mode, can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength to enhance sealant retention and efficacy. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Embrace WetBond(TM) (EWS) PF sealants with SBU in the ER mode of application can be used as an alternative to a conventional technique for sealant placement for improving interfacial bond strength. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Swathy SR, Naidu J. A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):48-53. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10067991/ /pubmed/37020754 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2500 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Swathy, RS
Naidu, Jaya
A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Embrace Wetbond(TM) Pit and Fissure Sealant with or without the Use of a Universal Dental Adhesive System [Scotchbond(TM) Universal Adhesive] Using Different Bonding Protocols: A Multiparametric In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of embrace wetbond(tm) pit and fissure sealant with or without the use of a universal dental adhesive system [scotchbond(tm) universal adhesive] using different bonding protocols: a multiparametric in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020754
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2500
work_keys_str_mv AT swathyrs acomparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofembracewetbondtmpitandfissuresealantwithorwithouttheuseofauniversaldentaladhesivesystemscotchbondtmuniversaladhesiveusingdifferentbondingprotocolsamultiparametricinvitrostudy
AT naidujaya acomparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofembracewetbondtmpitandfissuresealantwithorwithouttheuseofauniversaldentaladhesivesystemscotchbondtmuniversaladhesiveusingdifferentbondingprotocolsamultiparametricinvitrostudy
AT swathyrs comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofembracewetbondtmpitandfissuresealantwithorwithouttheuseofauniversaldentaladhesivesystemscotchbondtmuniversaladhesiveusingdifferentbondingprotocolsamultiparametricinvitrostudy
AT naidujaya comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofembracewetbondtmpitandfissuresealantwithorwithouttheuseofauniversaldentaladhesivesystemscotchbondtmuniversaladhesiveusingdifferentbondingprotocolsamultiparametricinvitrostudy