Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements

The most common pathological condition, dental caries when remain untreated which shows pulpal involvement and may lead to invasive treatment, such as crown placement followed by pulp therapy. Larger carious lesions on primary molars stainless steel crowns (SSCs) placement by means of conventional t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thakur, Nidhi S, Tyagi, Parimala, Tiwari, Shilpi, Mali, Shikha, Chhattani, Barkha, Bhargava, Sanjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020771
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2510
_version_ 1785018595642703872
author Thakur, Nidhi S
Tyagi, Parimala
Tiwari, Shilpi
Mali, Shikha
Chhattani, Barkha
Bhargava, Sanjana
author_facet Thakur, Nidhi S
Tyagi, Parimala
Tiwari, Shilpi
Mali, Shikha
Chhattani, Barkha
Bhargava, Sanjana
author_sort Thakur, Nidhi S
collection PubMed
description The most common pathological condition, dental caries when remain untreated which shows pulpal involvement and may lead to invasive treatment, such as crown placement followed by pulp therapy. Larger carious lesions on primary molars stainless steel crowns (SSCs) placement by means of conventional tooth preparation. The modern approach to managing carious lesions concentrates on using less invasive treatment techniques, with the focus being on biofilm change. One among such alternative method of managing the primary molars is the Hall's technique. Another most important factor for the survival of a crown is its sealing ability, in which luting cements, such as adhesive cements, have a crucial role as they help in providing a suitable marginal seal and thereby cause a reduction in the microleakage. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has proven anticariogenic activity in arresting carious lesions. Hence the aim was to evaluate and compare the microleakage of SSCs placed by Hall's technique, Hall's technique with SDF, and the conventional crown technique using different luting cements. A total of 60 primary first and second molars with occlusoproximal caries, which were initial and moderate in nature. The blocks were randomly divided into three groups, in which precontoured SSCs were applied by using either the Hall's technique or the conventional technique. After subjecting tothermocycling, the samples were examined under stereomicroscopic for microleakage evaluation. A few samples were randomly selected from each subgroup, and a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination was done. Highest values of microleakage were noted with Hall's technique resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) luting cement group. It can be concluded from the present study that the conventional technique was found to be superior over the Hall's technique with SDF and then by the Hall's group alone. SDF application beneath the Hall's crown appears to be promising approach for the reduction of microleakage. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Thakur NS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):16-21.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100680022023-04-04 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements Thakur, Nidhi S Tyagi, Parimala Tiwari, Shilpi Mali, Shikha Chhattani, Barkha Bhargava, Sanjana Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Research The most common pathological condition, dental caries when remain untreated which shows pulpal involvement and may lead to invasive treatment, such as crown placement followed by pulp therapy. Larger carious lesions on primary molars stainless steel crowns (SSCs) placement by means of conventional tooth preparation. The modern approach to managing carious lesions concentrates on using less invasive treatment techniques, with the focus being on biofilm change. One among such alternative method of managing the primary molars is the Hall's technique. Another most important factor for the survival of a crown is its sealing ability, in which luting cements, such as adhesive cements, have a crucial role as they help in providing a suitable marginal seal and thereby cause a reduction in the microleakage. Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has proven anticariogenic activity in arresting carious lesions. Hence the aim was to evaluate and compare the microleakage of SSCs placed by Hall's technique, Hall's technique with SDF, and the conventional crown technique using different luting cements. A total of 60 primary first and second molars with occlusoproximal caries, which were initial and moderate in nature. The blocks were randomly divided into three groups, in which precontoured SSCs were applied by using either the Hall's technique or the conventional technique. After subjecting tothermocycling, the samples were examined under stereomicroscopic for microleakage evaluation. A few samples were randomly selected from each subgroup, and a scanning electron microscopic (SEM) examination was done. Highest values of microleakage were noted with Hall's technique resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) luting cement group. It can be concluded from the present study that the conventional technique was found to be superior over the Hall's technique with SDF and then by the Hall's group alone. SDF application beneath the Hall's crown appears to be promising approach for the reduction of microleakage. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Thakur NS, Tyagi P, Tiwari S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(1):16-21. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10068002/ /pubmed/37020771 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2510 Text en Copyright © 2023; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2023 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Research
Thakur, Nidhi S
Tyagi, Parimala
Tiwari, Shilpi
Mali, Shikha
Chhattani, Barkha
Bhargava, Sanjana
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage in Hall's with SDF, Hall's, and Conventional Technique Using Different Luting Cements
title_sort comparative evaluation of microleakage in hall's with sdf, hall's, and conventional technique using different luting cements
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020771
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2510
work_keys_str_mv AT thakurnidhis comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements
AT tyagiparimala comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements
AT tiwarishilpi comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements
AT malishikha comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements
AT chhattanibarkha comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements
AT bhargavasanjana comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageinhallswithsdfhallsandconventionaltechniqueusingdifferentlutingcements