Cargando…

(701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients

PURPOSE: The protection of solid organ transplant recipients from infection has been challenging throughout the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. In 2022, tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) was introduced as a means of providing passive antibodies and augmenting the vaccine immune response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grillini, A., Stracener, P., Scarola, D., Lyons, J., Dilling, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068082/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.715
_version_ 1785018612240613376
author Grillini, A.
Stracener, P.
Scarola, D.
Lyons, J.
Dilling, D.
author_facet Grillini, A.
Stracener, P.
Scarola, D.
Lyons, J.
Dilling, D.
author_sort Grillini, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The protection of solid organ transplant recipients from infection has been challenging throughout the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. In 2022, tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) was introduced as a means of providing passive antibodies and augmenting the vaccine immune response in immunocompromised patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy of Evusheld in reducing the incidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, observational cohort study examining SARS-CoV-2 incidence in 289 lung transplant recipients from January 2022 through July 2022. Manual chart extraction was utilized to collect dates of Evusheld administration, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as demographic and clinical data. Exact logistic regression models were used to compare incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates between lung transplant recipients who received versus did not receive Evusheld. RESULTS: Of the 289 lung transplant recipients, 136 (47.1%) received Evusheld during the study period. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplant recipients who received Evusheld was 8.1% (or 11/136), compared to 34.0% (or 52/153) among those who did not receive Evusheld. Controlling for the number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines received, the odds of a SARS-CoV-2 infection was approximately 83% lower for patients who received Evusheld (OR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.38, p<0.001). Further, the rate of hospitalization was available for 62 of 63 (98.4%) patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these patients, no patient in the Evusheld group required hospitalization; conversely, 12 of 51 (23.5%) patients who did not receive Evusheld required hospitalization (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.00 to 2.38, p=0.21). CONCLUSION: Evusheld administration was associated with significant efficacy in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100680822023-04-03 (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Grillini, A. Stracener, P. Scarola, D. Lyons, J. Dilling, D. J Heart Lung Transplant Article PURPOSE: The protection of solid organ transplant recipients from infection has been challenging throughout the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. In 2022, tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) was introduced as a means of providing passive antibodies and augmenting the vaccine immune response in immunocompromised patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy of Evusheld in reducing the incidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a single center, retrospective, observational cohort study examining SARS-CoV-2 incidence in 289 lung transplant recipients from January 2022 through July 2022. Manual chart extraction was utilized to collect dates of Evusheld administration, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, and SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as demographic and clinical data. Exact logistic regression models were used to compare incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates between lung transplant recipients who received versus did not receive Evusheld. RESULTS: Of the 289 lung transplant recipients, 136 (47.1%) received Evusheld during the study period. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in transplant recipients who received Evusheld was 8.1% (or 11/136), compared to 34.0% (or 52/153) among those who did not receive Evusheld. Controlling for the number of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines received, the odds of a SARS-CoV-2 infection was approximately 83% lower for patients who received Evusheld (OR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.38, p<0.001). Further, the rate of hospitalization was available for 62 of 63 (98.4%) patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these patients, no patient in the Evusheld group required hospitalization; conversely, 12 of 51 (23.5%) patients who did not receive Evusheld required hospitalization (OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.00 to 2.38, p=0.21). CONCLUSION: Evusheld administration was associated with significant efficacy in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in lung transplant recipients. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-04 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10068082/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.715 Text en Copyright © 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Grillini, A.
Stracener, P.
Scarola, D.
Lyons, J.
Dilling, D.
(701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title_full (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title_fullStr (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title_full_unstemmed (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title_short (701) Use of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) and Subsequent Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients
title_sort (701) use of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (evusheld) and subsequent outcomes of sars-cov-2 infections in lung transplant recipients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068082/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2023.02.715
work_keys_str_mv AT grillinia 701useoftixagevimabandcilgavimabevusheldandsubsequentoutcomesofsarscov2infectionsinlungtransplantrecipients
AT stracenerp 701useoftixagevimabandcilgavimabevusheldandsubsequentoutcomesofsarscov2infectionsinlungtransplantrecipients
AT scarolad 701useoftixagevimabandcilgavimabevusheldandsubsequentoutcomesofsarscov2infectionsinlungtransplantrecipients
AT lyonsj 701useoftixagevimabandcilgavimabevusheldandsubsequentoutcomesofsarscov2infectionsinlungtransplantrecipients
AT dillingd 701useoftixagevimabandcilgavimabevusheldandsubsequentoutcomesofsarscov2infectionsinlungtransplantrecipients