Cargando…

Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Joshua E, Brouillette, Marc J, Miller, Benjamin J, Goetz, Jessica E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240
_version_ 1785018618727104512
author Johnson, Joshua E
Brouillette, Marc J
Miller, Benjamin J
Goetz, Jessica E
author_facet Johnson, Joshua E
Brouillette, Marc J
Miller, Benjamin J
Goetz, Jessica E
author_sort Johnson, Joshua E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. METHODS: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. RESULTS: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (R(2) = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (R(2) = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068135
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100681352023-04-04 Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations Johnson, Joshua E Brouillette, Marc J Miller, Benjamin J Goetz, Jessica E Biomed Eng Comput Biol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. METHODS: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. RESULTS: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (R(2) = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (R(2) = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD. SAGE Publications 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10068135/ /pubmed/37020922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Johnson, Joshua E
Brouillette, Marc J
Miller, Benjamin J
Goetz, Jessica E
Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title_full Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title_fullStr Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title_short Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
title_sort finite element model-computed mechanical behavior of femurs with metastatic disease varies between physiologic and idealized loading simulations
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068135/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonjoshuae finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations
AT brouillettemarcj finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations
AT millerbenjaminj finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations
AT goetzjessicae finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations