Cargando…
Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE mode...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240 |
_version_ | 1785018618727104512 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Joshua E Brouillette, Marc J Miller, Benjamin J Goetz, Jessica E |
author_facet | Johnson, Joshua E Brouillette, Marc J Miller, Benjamin J Goetz, Jessica E |
author_sort | Johnson, Joshua E |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. METHODS: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. RESULTS: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (R(2) = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (R(2) = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10068135 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100681352023-04-04 Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations Johnson, Joshua E Brouillette, Marc J Miller, Benjamin J Goetz, Jessica E Biomed Eng Comput Biol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Femurs affected by metastatic bone disease (MBD) frequently undergo surgery to prevent impending pathologic fractures due to clinician-perceived increases in fracture risk. Finite element (FE) models can provide more objective assessments of fracture risk. However, FE models of femurs with MBD have implemented strain- and strength-based estimates of fracture risk under a wide variety of loading configurations, and “physiologic” loading models typically simulate a single abductor force. Due to these variations, it is currently difficult to interpret mechanical fracture risk results across studies of femoral MBD. Our aims were to evaluate (1) differences in mechanical behavior between idealized loading configurations and those incorporating physiologic muscle forces, and (2) differences in the rankings of mechanical behavior between different loading configurations, in FE simulations to predict fracture risk in femurs with MBD. METHODS: We evaluated 9 different patient-specific FE loading simulations for a cohort of 54 MBD femurs: strain outcome simulations—physiologic (normal walking [NW], stair ascent [SA], stumbling), and joint contact only (NW contact force, excluding muscle forces); strength outcome simulations—physiologic (NW, SA), joint contact only, offset torsion, and sideways fall. Tensile principal strain and femur strength were compared between simulations using statistical analyses. RESULTS: Tensile principal strain was 26% higher (R(2) = 0.719, P < .001) and femur strength was 4% lower (R(2) = 0.984, P < .001) in simulations excluding physiologic muscle forces. Rankings of the mechanical predictions were correlated between the strain outcome simulations (ρ = 0.723 to 0.990, P < .001), and between strength outcome simulations (ρ = 0.524 to 0.984, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, simulations incorporating physiologic muscle forces affected local strain outcomes more than global strength outcomes. Absolute values of strain and strength computed using idealized (no muscle forces) and physiologic loading configurations should be used within the appropriate context when interpreting fracture risk in femurs with MBD. SAGE Publications 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10068135/ /pubmed/37020922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Johnson, Joshua E Brouillette, Marc J Miller, Benjamin J Goetz, Jessica E Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title | Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title_full | Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title_fullStr | Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title_short | Finite Element Model-Computed Mechanical Behavior of Femurs with Metastatic Disease Varies Between Physiologic and Idealized Loading Simulations |
title_sort | finite element model-computed mechanical behavior of femurs with metastatic disease varies between physiologic and idealized loading simulations |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068135/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/11795972231166240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonjoshuae finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations AT brouillettemarcj finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations AT millerbenjaminj finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations AT goetzjessicae finiteelementmodelcomputedmechanicalbehavioroffemurswithmetastaticdiseasevariesbetweenphysiologicandidealizedloadingsimulations |