Cargando…
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032 |
_version_ | 1785018663727792128 |
---|---|
author | Gill, Christian M Santini, Debora Takemura, Miki Longshaw, Christopher Yamano, Yoshinori Echols, Roger Nicolau, David P |
author_facet | Gill, Christian M Santini, Debora Takemura, Miki Longshaw, Christopher Yamano, Yoshinori Echols, Roger Nicolau, David P |
author_sort | Gill, Christian M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log(10) cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking. RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA −3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log(10) cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced −3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced −2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10068413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100684132023-04-04 In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii Gill, Christian M Santini, Debora Takemura, Miki Longshaw, Christopher Yamano, Yoshinori Echols, Roger Nicolau, David P J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log(10) cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking. RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA −3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log(10) cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced −3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced −2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates. Oxford University Press 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10068413/ /pubmed/36775993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gill, Christian M Santini, Debora Takemura, Miki Longshaw, Christopher Yamano, Yoshinori Echols, Roger Nicolau, David P In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title |
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_full |
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_fullStr |
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_short |
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii |
title_sort | in vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus acinetobacter baumannii |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillchristianm invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT santinidebora invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT takemuramiki invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT longshawchristopher invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT yamanoyoshinori invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT echolsroger invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii AT nicolaudavidp invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii |