Cargando…

In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gill, Christian M, Santini, Debora, Takemura, Miki, Longshaw, Christopher, Yamano, Yoshinori, Echols, Roger, Nicolau, David P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032
_version_ 1785018663727792128
author Gill, Christian M
Santini, Debora
Takemura, Miki
Longshaw, Christopher
Yamano, Yoshinori
Echols, Roger
Nicolau, David P
author_facet Gill, Christian M
Santini, Debora
Takemura, Miki
Longshaw, Christopher
Yamano, Yoshinori
Echols, Roger
Nicolau, David P
author_sort Gill, Christian M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log(10) cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking. RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA −3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log(10) cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced −3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced −2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100684132023-04-04 In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii Gill, Christian M Santini, Debora Takemura, Miki Longshaw, Christopher Yamano, Yoshinori Echols, Roger Nicolau, David P J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the in vivo efficacy and resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam and meropenem using human-simulated regimens (HSR) in the murine infection model. METHODS: In total, 15 clinical A. baumannii were assessed: cefiderocol MICs, 2 mg/L (previously developed resistance on therapy), n = 3; 8 mg/L, n = 2; ≥32 mg/L, n = 10 (including VEB and PER-harbouring isolates). Mice received inactive control, cefiderocol, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam (C-CZA), cefiderocol + ampicillin/sulbactam (C-SAM) or cefiderocol + meropenem (C-MEM) HSRs. The mean change in log(10) cfu/thigh compared with starting inoculum was assessed. Resistance development on treatment was a >4-fold increase in MIC relative control animals. In vitro activities of combinations were assessed by disc stacking. RESULTS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, combinations produced significant kill with C-CZA −3.75 ± 0.37 reduction in log(10) cfu/thigh, C-SAM produced −3.55 ± 0.50 and C-MEM produced −2.18 ± 1.75 relative to baseline. Elevated MICs in cefiderocol treated animals occurred in three out of three isolates with MICs of 2 mg/L. Of these isolates, one developed elevated MICs with C-MEM compared with none treated with C-CZA or C-SAM. Disc stacking with C-CZA or C-SAM returned all isolates to at least the CLSI intermediate breakpoint, which may correlate with in vivo efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Against cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates, cefiderocol + ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam HSR produced in vivo kill against all 12 cefiderocol-non-susceptible isolates. Cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam prevented the development of resistance during treatment against cefiderocol-high-end-susceptible isolates with a propensity for resistance on therapy. These data support the clinical evaluation of cefiderocol with ceftazidime/avibactam or ampicillin/sulbactam against A. baumannii, including multi-drug-resistant isolates. Oxford University Press 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10068413/ /pubmed/36775993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Gill, Christian M
Santini, Debora
Takemura, Miki
Longshaw, Christopher
Yamano, Yoshinori
Echols, Roger
Nicolau, David P
In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title_full In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title_fullStr In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title_full_unstemmed In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title_short In vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus Acinetobacter baumannii
title_sort in vivo efficacy & resistance prevention of cefiderocol in combination with ceftazidime/avibactam, ampicillin/sulbactam or meropenem using human-simulated regimens versus acinetobacter baumannii
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkad032
work_keys_str_mv AT gillchristianm invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT santinidebora invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT takemuramiki invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT longshawchristopher invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT yamanoyoshinori invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT echolsroger invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii
AT nicolaudavidp invivoefficacyresistancepreventionofcefiderocolincombinationwithceftazidimeavibactamampicillinsulbactamormeropenemusinghumansimulatedregimensversusacinetobacterbaumannii