Cargando…
To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to inv...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1 |
_version_ | 1785018707374768128 |
---|---|
author | Yan, Chun-ling Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan Chen, Ying Qv, Zong-yang Zuo, Ming-zhang |
author_facet | Yan, Chun-ling Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan Chen, Ying Qv, Zong-yang Zuo, Ming-zhang |
author_sort | Yan, Chun-ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to investigate the effect of two insertion techniques on OPLP. A total of 60 patients (male or female, 18–78 years, BMI 18.0–30.0 kg m(−2) and ASA I–II) receiving selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly recruited. After induction of anesthesia, the SaCoVLM™ was inserted by blind insertion manoeuvre. The glottic exposure grading(V1) of the SaCoVLM™ visual laryngeal mask and the OPLP(P1) were recorded. And the glottic exposure grading(V2) and OPLP(P2) of SaCoVLM™ were recorded again when the glottic exposure grading was optimal. The glottis exposure grading and OPLP were compared before and after different insertion manoeuver. The glottic exposure grading (V2) obtained by using up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre was better than that obtained by using blind insertion manoeuvre (V1)(P < 0.001). The OPLP was significantly lower in the blind insertion manoeuvre (P1) than in the up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre (P2) (32.4 ± 5.0 cmH(2)O vs. 36.3 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, P < 0.001). In using SaCoVLM™, higher OPLP and better glottic exposure grading were achieved through up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre, protecting the airway while real-time monitoring of conditions around the glottis, which significantly improves airway safety. Our results suggests that up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuver may be a useful technique for SaCoVLM™ insertion. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000028802. Registered 4 January 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR2000028802. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10068663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100686632023-04-04 To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia Yan, Chun-ling Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan Chen, Ying Qv, Zong-yang Zuo, Ming-zhang J Clin Monit Comput Original Research To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to investigate the effect of two insertion techniques on OPLP. A total of 60 patients (male or female, 18–78 years, BMI 18.0–30.0 kg m(−2) and ASA I–II) receiving selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly recruited. After induction of anesthesia, the SaCoVLM™ was inserted by blind insertion manoeuvre. The glottic exposure grading(V1) of the SaCoVLM™ visual laryngeal mask and the OPLP(P1) were recorded. And the glottic exposure grading(V2) and OPLP(P2) of SaCoVLM™ were recorded again when the glottic exposure grading was optimal. The glottis exposure grading and OPLP were compared before and after different insertion manoeuver. The glottic exposure grading (V2) obtained by using up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre was better than that obtained by using blind insertion manoeuvre (V1)(P < 0.001). The OPLP was significantly lower in the blind insertion manoeuvre (P1) than in the up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre (P2) (32.4 ± 5.0 cmH(2)O vs. 36.3 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, P < 0.001). In using SaCoVLM™, higher OPLP and better glottic exposure grading were achieved through up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre, protecting the airway while real-time monitoring of conditions around the glottis, which significantly improves airway safety. Our results suggests that up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuver may be a useful technique for SaCoVLM™ insertion. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000028802. Registered 4 January 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR2000028802. Springer Netherlands 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10068663/ /pubmed/36308611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yan, Chun-ling Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan Chen, Ying Qv, Zong-yang Zuo, Ming-zhang To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title | To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title_full | To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title_fullStr | To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed | To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title_short | To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
title_sort | to compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using sacovlm™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanchunling tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia AT zhangyiqiyuan tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia AT chenying tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia AT qvzongyang tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia AT zuomingzhang tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia |