Cargando…

To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia

To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Chun-ling, Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan, Chen, Ying, Qv, Zong-yang, Zuo, Ming-zhang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1
_version_ 1785018707374768128
author Yan, Chun-ling
Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan
Chen, Ying
Qv, Zong-yang
Zuo, Ming-zhang
author_facet Yan, Chun-ling
Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan
Chen, Ying
Qv, Zong-yang
Zuo, Ming-zhang
author_sort Yan, Chun-ling
collection PubMed
description To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to investigate the effect of two insertion techniques on OPLP. A total of 60 patients (male or female, 18–78 years, BMI 18.0–30.0 kg m(−2) and ASA I–II) receiving selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly recruited. After induction of anesthesia, the SaCoVLM™ was inserted by blind insertion manoeuvre. The glottic exposure grading(V1) of the SaCoVLM™ visual laryngeal mask and the OPLP(P1) were recorded. And the glottic exposure grading(V2) and OPLP(P2) of SaCoVLM™ were recorded again when the glottic exposure grading was optimal. The glottis exposure grading and OPLP were compared before and after different insertion manoeuver. The glottic exposure grading (V2) obtained by using up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre was better than that obtained by using blind insertion manoeuvre (V1)(P < 0.001). The OPLP was significantly lower in the blind insertion manoeuvre (P1) than in the up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre (P2) (32.4 ± 5.0 cmH(2)O vs. 36.3 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, P < 0.001). In using SaCoVLM™, higher OPLP and better glottic exposure grading were achieved through up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre, protecting the airway while real-time monitoring of conditions around the glottis, which significantly improves airway safety. Our results suggests that up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuver may be a useful technique for SaCoVLM™ insertion. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000028802. Registered 4 January 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR2000028802.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100686632023-04-04 To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia Yan, Chun-ling Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan Chen, Ying Qv, Zong-yang Zuo, Ming-zhang J Clin Monit Comput Original Research To compare the potential influences of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP) in using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask (VLM) among patients undergoing general anesthesia. A randomized self-control study controlled was conducted to investigate the effect of two insertion techniques on OPLP. A total of 60 patients (male or female, 18–78 years, BMI 18.0–30.0 kg m(−2) and ASA I–II) receiving selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly recruited. After induction of anesthesia, the SaCoVLM™ was inserted by blind insertion manoeuvre. The glottic exposure grading(V1) of the SaCoVLM™ visual laryngeal mask and the OPLP(P1) were recorded. And the glottic exposure grading(V2) and OPLP(P2) of SaCoVLM™ were recorded again when the glottic exposure grading was optimal. The glottis exposure grading and OPLP were compared before and after different insertion manoeuver. The glottic exposure grading (V2) obtained by using up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre was better than that obtained by using blind insertion manoeuvre (V1)(P < 0.001). The OPLP was significantly lower in the blind insertion manoeuvre (P1) than in the up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre (P2) (32.4 ± 5.0 cmH(2)O vs. 36.3 ± 5.2 cmH(2)O, P < 0.001). In using SaCoVLM™, higher OPLP and better glottic exposure grading were achieved through up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre, protecting the airway while real-time monitoring of conditions around the glottis, which significantly improves airway safety. Our results suggests that up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuver may be a useful technique for SaCoVLM™ insertion. Trial registration: ChiCTR, ChiCTR2000028802. Registered 4 January 2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn/ChiCTR2000028802. Springer Netherlands 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10068663/ /pubmed/36308611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Yan, Chun-ling
Zhang, Yi-qi-yuan
Chen, Ying
Qv, Zong-yang
Zuo, Ming-zhang
To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_full To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_fullStr To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_short To compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using SaCoVLM™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
title_sort to compare the influence of blind insertion and up-down optimized glottic exposure manoeuvre on oropharyngeal leak pressure using sacovlm™ video laryngeal mask among patients undergoing general anesthesia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-022-00930-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yanchunling tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT zhangyiqiyuan tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT chenying tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT qvzongyang tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia
AT zuomingzhang tocomparetheinfluenceofblindinsertionandupdownoptimizedglotticexposuremanoeuvreonoropharyngealleakpressureusingsacovlmvideolaryngealmaskamongpatientsundergoinggeneralanesthesia