Cargando…
Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick?
BACKGROUND: Informed consent of the patient prior to surgical procedures is obligatory. A good and informative communication improves patients’ understanding and confidence, thus may strengthen the patient-doctor relationship. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of additional ster...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x |
_version_ | 1785018707604406272 |
---|---|
author | Hertzsprung, Nicolas Krantchev, Kiril Picht, Thomas Roethe, Anna L. Rubarth, Kerstin Fuellhase, Josch Vajkoczy, Peter Acker, Güliz |
author_facet | Hertzsprung, Nicolas Krantchev, Kiril Picht, Thomas Roethe, Anna L. Rubarth, Kerstin Fuellhase, Josch Vajkoczy, Peter Acker, Güliz |
author_sort | Hertzsprung, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Informed consent of the patient prior to surgical procedures is obligatory. A good and informative communication improves patients’ understanding and confidence, thus may strengthen the patient-doctor relationship. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of additional stereoscopic visualization of patient-specific imaging during informed consent conversation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for a brain tumor surgery were screened for this study prospectively. The primary exclusion criteria were cognitive or visual impairments. The participants were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent a conventional surgical informed consent performed by a neurosurgeon including a demonstration of the individual MRI on a 2D computer screen. The second group received an additional stereoscopic visualization of the same imaging to explain the pathology more in-depth. The patients were then asked to fill in a questionnaire after each part. This questionnaire was designed to assess the potential information gained from the patients with details on the anatomical location of the tumor as well as the surgical procedure and possible complications. Patients’ subjective impression about the informed consent was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included in this study. After additional stereoscopic visualization, no significant increase in patient understanding was found for either objective criteria or subjective assessment. Participants’ anxiety was not increased by stereoscopic visualization. Overall, patients perceived stereoscopic imaging as helpful from a subjective perspective. Confidence in the department was high in both groups. CONCLUSION: Stereoscopic visualization of MRI images within informed consent conversation did not improve the objective understanding of the patients in our series. Although no objective anatomical knowledge gain was noted in this series, patients felt that the addition of stereoscopic visualization improved their overall understanding. It therefore potentially increases patient confidence in treatment decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10068664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100686642023-04-04 Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? Hertzsprung, Nicolas Krantchev, Kiril Picht, Thomas Roethe, Anna L. Rubarth, Kerstin Fuellhase, Josch Vajkoczy, Peter Acker, Güliz Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Neurosurgery general BACKGROUND: Informed consent of the patient prior to surgical procedures is obligatory. A good and informative communication improves patients’ understanding and confidence, thus may strengthen the patient-doctor relationship. The aim of our study was to investigate the usefulness of additional stereoscopic visualization of patient-specific imaging during informed consent conversation. METHODS: Patients scheduled for a brain tumor surgery were screened for this study prospectively. The primary exclusion criteria were cognitive or visual impairments. The participants were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent a conventional surgical informed consent performed by a neurosurgeon including a demonstration of the individual MRI on a 2D computer screen. The second group received an additional stereoscopic visualization of the same imaging to explain the pathology more in-depth. The patients were then asked to fill in a questionnaire after each part. This questionnaire was designed to assess the potential information gained from the patients with details on the anatomical location of the tumor as well as the surgical procedure and possible complications. Patients’ subjective impression about the informed consent was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were included in this study. After additional stereoscopic visualization, no significant increase in patient understanding was found for either objective criteria or subjective assessment. Participants’ anxiety was not increased by stereoscopic visualization. Overall, patients perceived stereoscopic imaging as helpful from a subjective perspective. Confidence in the department was high in both groups. CONCLUSION: Stereoscopic visualization of MRI images within informed consent conversation did not improve the objective understanding of the patients in our series. Although no objective anatomical knowledge gain was noted in this series, patients felt that the addition of stereoscopic visualization improved their overall understanding. It therefore potentially increases patient confidence in treatment decisions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x. Springer Vienna 2023-02-28 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10068664/ /pubmed/36853569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Neurosurgery general Hertzsprung, Nicolas Krantchev, Kiril Picht, Thomas Roethe, Anna L. Rubarth, Kerstin Fuellhase, Josch Vajkoczy, Peter Acker, Güliz Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title | Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title_full | Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title_fullStr | Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title_full_unstemmed | Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title_short | Personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
title_sort | personalized surgical informed consent with stereoscopic visualization in neurosurgery—real benefit for the patient or unnecessary gimmick? |
topic | Original Article - Neurosurgery general |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36853569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05512-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hertzsprungnicolas personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT krantchevkiril personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT pichtthomas personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT roetheannal personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT rubarthkerstin personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT fuellhasejosch personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT vajkoczypeter personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick AT ackerguliz personalizedsurgicalinformedconsentwithstereoscopicvisualizationinneurosurgeryrealbenefitforthepatientorunnecessarygimmick |