Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine

PURPOSE: Radiolucent anterior and posterior implants by carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR PEEK) aim to improve treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the spine during the last years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after dorsoventral ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwendner, Maximilian, Ille, Sebastian, Kirschke, Jan S., Bernhardt, Denise, Combs, Stephanie E., Meyer, Bernhard, Krieg, Sandro M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z
_version_ 1785018707829850112
author Schwendner, Maximilian
Ille, Sebastian
Kirschke, Jan S.
Bernhardt, Denise
Combs, Stephanie E.
Meyer, Bernhard
Krieg, Sandro M.
author_facet Schwendner, Maximilian
Ille, Sebastian
Kirschke, Jan S.
Bernhardt, Denise
Combs, Stephanie E.
Meyer, Bernhard
Krieg, Sandro M.
author_sort Schwendner, Maximilian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Radiolucent anterior and posterior implants by carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR PEEK) aim to improve treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the spine during the last years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after dorsoventral instrumentation using a CFR PEEK implant in a cohort of patients representing clinical reality. METHODS: A total of 25 patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine underwent vertebral body replacement (VBR) using an expandable CFR PEEK implant between January 2021 and January 2022. Patient outcome, complications, and radiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A consecutive series aged 65.8 ± 14.7 (27.6–91.2) years were treated at 37 vertebrae of tumor manifestation, including two cases (8.0%) of primary tumor as well as 23 cases (92.0%) of spinal metastases. Overall, 26 cages covering a median of 1 level (1–4) were implanted. Duration of surgery was 134 ± 104 (65–576) min, with a blood loss of 792 ± 785 (100–4000) ml. No intraoperative cage revision was required. Surgical complications were reported in three (12.0%) cases including hemothorax in two cases (one intraoperative, one postoperative) and atrophic wound healing disorder in one case. In two cases (8.0%), revision surgery was performed (fracture of the adjacent tumorous vertebrae, progressive construct failure regarding cage subsidence). No implant failure was observed. CONCLUSION: VBR using CFR PEEK cages represents a legitimate surgical strategy which opens a variety of improvements—especially in patients in need of postoperative radiotherapy of the spine and MRI-based follow-up examinations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10068665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100686652023-04-04 Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine Schwendner, Maximilian Ille, Sebastian Kirschke, Jan S. Bernhardt, Denise Combs, Stephanie E. Meyer, Bernhard Krieg, Sandro M. Acta Neurochir (Wien) Original Article - Spine - Other PURPOSE: Radiolucent anterior and posterior implants by carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR PEEK) aim to improve treatment of primary and secondary tumors of the spine during the last years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after dorsoventral instrumentation using a CFR PEEK implant in a cohort of patients representing clinical reality. METHODS: A total of 25 patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine underwent vertebral body replacement (VBR) using an expandable CFR PEEK implant between January 2021 and January 2022. Patient outcome, complications, and radiographic follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: A consecutive series aged 65.8 ± 14.7 (27.6–91.2) years were treated at 37 vertebrae of tumor manifestation, including two cases (8.0%) of primary tumor as well as 23 cases (92.0%) of spinal metastases. Overall, 26 cages covering a median of 1 level (1–4) were implanted. Duration of surgery was 134 ± 104 (65–576) min, with a blood loss of 792 ± 785 (100–4000) ml. No intraoperative cage revision was required. Surgical complications were reported in three (12.0%) cases including hemothorax in two cases (one intraoperative, one postoperative) and atrophic wound healing disorder in one case. In two cases (8.0%), revision surgery was performed (fracture of the adjacent tumorous vertebrae, progressive construct failure regarding cage subsidence). No implant failure was observed. CONCLUSION: VBR using CFR PEEK cages represents a legitimate surgical strategy which opens a variety of improvements—especially in patients in need of postoperative radiotherapy of the spine and MRI-based follow-up examinations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z. Springer Vienna 2023-02-23 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10068665/ /pubmed/36820888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article - Spine - Other
Schwendner, Maximilian
Ille, Sebastian
Kirschke, Jan S.
Bernhardt, Denise
Combs, Stephanie E.
Meyer, Bernhard
Krieg, Sandro M.
Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title_full Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title_short Clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
title_sort clinical evaluation of vertebral body replacement of carbon fiber–reinforced polyetheretherketone in patients with tumor manifestation of the thoracic and lumbar spine
topic Original Article - Spine - Other
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36820888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05502-z
work_keys_str_mv AT schwendnermaximilian clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT illesebastian clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT kirschkejans clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT bernhardtdenise clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT combsstephaniee clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT meyerbernhard clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine
AT kriegsandrom clinicalevaluationofvertebralbodyreplacementofcarbonfiberreinforcedpolyetheretherketoneinpatientswithtumormanifestationofthethoracicandlumbarspine