Cargando…
Public attitudes to implementing financial incentives in stopsmoking services in Ireland
INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives improve stop-smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes on financial incentives to stop smoking were measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020632 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tpc/162364 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives improve stop-smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes on financial incentives to stop smoking were measured. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to 1000 people in Ireland aged ≥15 years in 2022, sampled through random digit dialing. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI: 43.9–50.1) of the participants supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI: 40.3–46.5) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI: 29.2–35.0). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under €250 (median=100, range: 1–7000). Compared to their counterparts, those of lower education level (AOR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.10–2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (AOR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.02–2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people. CONCLUSIONS: While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop-smoking service outcomes. |
---|