Alternative Flexibility Training

Over the last approximately 20 years, research has reported on performance impairments following prolonged durations of static stretching. This has led to a paradigm shift towards dynamic stretching. There has also been a greater emphasis using foam rollers, vibration devices, and other techniques....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Behm, David G, Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos, Korooshfard, Negar, Anvar, Saman Hadjizadeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NASMI 2023
Materias:
IFSPT International Perspective
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020433
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.73311
_version_ 1785018836038189056
author Behm, David G
Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos
Korooshfard, Negar
Anvar, Saman Hadjizadeh
author_facet Behm, David G
Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos
Korooshfard, Negar
Anvar, Saman Hadjizadeh
author_sort Behm, David G
collection PubMed
description Over the last approximately 20 years, research has reported on performance impairments following prolonged durations of static stretching. This has led to a paradigm shift towards dynamic stretching. There has also been a greater emphasis using foam rollers, vibration devices, and other techniques. Recent commentaries and meta-analyses suggest that stretching need not be listed as a fitness component as other activities such as resistance training can provide similar range of motion benefits. The commentary aims to review and compare the effects of static stretching and alternative exercises for improving range of motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher NASMI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100693832023-04-04 Alternative Flexibility Training Behm, David G Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos Korooshfard, Negar Anvar, Saman Hadjizadeh Int J Sports Phys Ther IFSPT International Perspective Over the last approximately 20 years, research has reported on performance impairments following prolonged durations of static stretching. This has led to a paradigm shift towards dynamic stretching. There has also been a greater emphasis using foam rollers, vibration devices, and other techniques. Recent commentaries and meta-analyses suggest that stretching need not be listed as a fitness component as other activities such as resistance training can provide similar range of motion benefits. The commentary aims to review and compare the effects of static stretching and alternative exercises for improving range of motion. NASMI 2023-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10069383/ /pubmed/37020433 http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.73311 Text en © The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle IFSPT International Perspective
Behm, David G
Aragão-Santos, Jose Carlos
Korooshfard, Negar
Anvar, Saman Hadjizadeh
Alternative Flexibility Training
title Alternative Flexibility Training
title_full Alternative Flexibility Training
title_fullStr Alternative Flexibility Training
title_full_unstemmed Alternative Flexibility Training
title_short Alternative Flexibility Training
title_sort alternative flexibility training
topic IFSPT International Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020433
http://dx.doi.org/10.26603/001c.73311
work_keys_str_mv AT behmdavidg alternativeflexibilitytraining
AT aragaosantosjosecarlos alternativeflexibilitytraining
AT korooshfardnegar alternativeflexibilitytraining
AT anvarsamanhadjizadeh alternativeflexibilitytraining

Ejemplares similares