Cargando…
Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020850 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084 |
_version_ | 1785018843458961408 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Jian Ma, Ning Sun, Mingyao Chen, Li Yao, Qimin Chen, XingFa Lin, Cuibo Lu, Yongwei Lin, Yingtao Lin, Liang Fan, Xuexiong Chen, Yiyu Wu, Jingjing He, Haixin |
author_facet | Chen, Jian Ma, Ning Sun, Mingyao Chen, Li Yao, Qimin Chen, XingFa Lin, Cuibo Lu, Yongwei Lin, Yingtao Lin, Liang Fan, Xuexiong Chen, Yiyu Wu, Jingjing He, Haixin |
author_sort | Chen, Jian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and outcome of patients suffering from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix (NECCs). METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with NECCs, who had undergone pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between November 2002 and June 2019. The median follow-up period was 50.7 months. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually by two radiologists. ADC values in the lesions were calculated using the Functool software. These values were compared between different clinicopathological parameters groups. The Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to forecast survival rates. Prognostic factors were decided by the Cox regression method. RESULTS: In the cohort of 83 patients, nine, 42, 23, and nine patients were in stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. ADC(mean), ADC(max), and ADC(min) were greatly lower in stage IIB–IVB than in stage I–IIA tumours, as well as in tumours measuring ≥ 4 cm than in those < 4 cm. ADC(mean), FIGO stage, and age at dianosis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year overall survival (OS). ADC(min), FIGO stage, age at diagnosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. For surgically treated patients (n = 45), ADC(max) was an independent prognostic parameter for both 5-year OS and 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS: ADC(mean), ADC(min), and ADC(max) are independent prognostic factors for NECCs. ADC analysis could be useful in predicting the survival outcomes in patients with NECCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100694202023-04-04 Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix Chen, Jian Ma, Ning Sun, Mingyao Chen, Li Yao, Qimin Chen, XingFa Lin, Cuibo Lu, Yongwei Lin, Yingtao Lin, Liang Fan, Xuexiong Chen, Yiyu Wu, Jingjing He, Haixin PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and outcome of patients suffering from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix (NECCs). METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with NECCs, who had undergone pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between November 2002 and June 2019. The median follow-up period was 50.7 months. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually by two radiologists. ADC values in the lesions were calculated using the Functool software. These values were compared between different clinicopathological parameters groups. The Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to forecast survival rates. Prognostic factors were decided by the Cox regression method. RESULTS: In the cohort of 83 patients, nine, 42, 23, and nine patients were in stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. ADC(mean), ADC(max), and ADC(min) were greatly lower in stage IIB–IVB than in stage I–IIA tumours, as well as in tumours measuring ≥ 4 cm than in those < 4 cm. ADC(mean), FIGO stage, and age at dianosis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year overall survival (OS). ADC(min), FIGO stage, age at diagnosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. For surgically treated patients (n = 45), ADC(max) was an independent prognostic parameter for both 5-year OS and 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS: ADC(mean), ADC(min), and ADC(max) are independent prognostic factors for NECCs. ADC analysis could be useful in predicting the survival outcomes in patients with NECCs. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10069420/ /pubmed/37020850 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084 Text en ©2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Gynecology and Obstetrics Chen, Jian Ma, Ning Sun, Mingyao Chen, Li Yao, Qimin Chen, XingFa Lin, Cuibo Lu, Yongwei Lin, Yingtao Lin, Liang Fan, Xuexiong Chen, Yiyu Wu, Jingjing He, Haixin Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title | Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title_full | Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title_short | Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
title_sort | prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix |
topic | Gynecology and Obstetrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020850 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenjian prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT maning prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT sunmingyao prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT chenli prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT yaoqimin prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT chenxingfa prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT lincuibo prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT luyongwei prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT linyingtao prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT linliang prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT fanxuexiong prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT chenyiyu prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT wujingjing prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix AT hehaixin prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix |