Cargando…

Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix

OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jian, Ma, Ning, Sun, Mingyao, Chen, Li, Yao, Qimin, Chen, XingFa, Lin, Cuibo, Lu, Yongwei, Lin, Yingtao, Lin, Liang, Fan, Xuexiong, Chen, Yiyu, Wu, Jingjing, He, Haixin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020850
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084
_version_ 1785018843458961408
author Chen, Jian
Ma, Ning
Sun, Mingyao
Chen, Li
Yao, Qimin
Chen, XingFa
Lin, Cuibo
Lu, Yongwei
Lin, Yingtao
Lin, Liang
Fan, Xuexiong
Chen, Yiyu
Wu, Jingjing
He, Haixin
author_facet Chen, Jian
Ma, Ning
Sun, Mingyao
Chen, Li
Yao, Qimin
Chen, XingFa
Lin, Cuibo
Lu, Yongwei
Lin, Yingtao
Lin, Liang
Fan, Xuexiong
Chen, Yiyu
Wu, Jingjing
He, Haixin
author_sort Chen, Jian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and outcome of patients suffering from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix (NECCs). METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with NECCs, who had undergone pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between November 2002 and June 2019. The median follow-up period was 50.7 months. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually by two radiologists. ADC values in the lesions were calculated using the Functool software. These values were compared between different clinicopathological parameters groups. The Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to forecast survival rates. Prognostic factors were decided by the Cox regression method. RESULTS: In the cohort of 83 patients, nine, 42, 23, and nine patients were in stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. ADC(mean), ADC(max), and ADC(min) were greatly lower in stage IIB–IVB than in stage I–IIA tumours, as well as in tumours measuring ≥ 4 cm than in those < 4 cm. ADC(mean), FIGO stage, and age at dianosis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year overall survival (OS). ADC(min), FIGO stage, age at diagnosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. For surgically treated patients (n = 45), ADC(max) was an independent prognostic parameter for both 5-year OS and 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS: ADC(mean), ADC(min), and ADC(max) are independent prognostic factors for NECCs. ADC analysis could be useful in predicting the survival outcomes in patients with NECCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100694202023-04-04 Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix Chen, Jian Ma, Ning Sun, Mingyao Chen, Li Yao, Qimin Chen, XingFa Lin, Cuibo Lu, Yongwei Lin, Yingtao Lin, Liang Fan, Xuexiong Chen, Yiyu Wu, Jingjing He, Haixin PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics OBJECTIVES: This research was designed to examine the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and clinicopathological parameters, and to explore the prognostic value of ADC values in predicting the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage and outcome of patients suffering from neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix (NECCs). METHODS: This retrospective study included 83 patients with NECCs, who had undergone pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between November 2002 and June 2019. The median follow-up period was 50.7 months. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually by two radiologists. ADC values in the lesions were calculated using the Functool software. These values were compared between different clinicopathological parameters groups. The Kaplan–Meier approach was adopted to forecast survival rates. Prognostic factors were decided by the Cox regression method. RESULTS: In the cohort of 83 patients, nine, 42, 23, and nine patients were in stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. ADC(mean), ADC(max), and ADC(min) were greatly lower in stage IIB–IVB than in stage I–IIA tumours, as well as in tumours measuring ≥ 4 cm than in those < 4 cm. ADC(mean), FIGO stage, and age at dianosis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year overall survival (OS). ADC(min), FIGO stage, age at diagnosis and para-aortic lymph node metastasis were independent prognostic variables for the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) in multivariate analysis. For surgically treated patients (n = 45), ADC(max) was an independent prognostic parameter for both 5-year OS and 5-year PFS. CONCLUSIONS: ADC(mean), ADC(min), and ADC(max) are independent prognostic factors for NECCs. ADC analysis could be useful in predicting the survival outcomes in patients with NECCs. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10069420/ /pubmed/37020850 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084 Text en ©2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Gynecology and Obstetrics
Chen, Jian
Ma, Ning
Sun, Mingyao
Chen, Li
Yao, Qimin
Chen, XingFa
Lin, Cuibo
Lu, Yongwei
Lin, Yingtao
Lin, Liang
Fan, Xuexiong
Chen, Yiyu
Wu, Jingjing
He, Haixin
Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title_full Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title_fullStr Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title_short Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
title_sort prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in neuroendocrine carcinomas of the uterine cervix
topic Gynecology and Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020850
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15084
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjian prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT maning prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT sunmingyao prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT chenli prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT yaoqimin prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT chenxingfa prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT lincuibo prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT luyongwei prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT linyingtao prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT linliang prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT fanxuexiong prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT chenyiyu prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT wujingjing prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix
AT hehaixin prognosticvalueofapparentdiffusioncoefficientinneuroendocrinecarcinomasoftheuterinecervix