Cargando…

Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling

BACKGROUND: Benthic invertebrate (BI) surveys have been widely used to characterize freshwater environmental quality but can be challenging to implement at desired spatial scales and frequency. Environmental DNA (eDNA) allows an alternative BI survey approach, one that can potentially be implemented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aunins, Aaron A., Mueller, Sara J., Fike, Jennifer A., Cornman, Robert S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020852
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15163
_version_ 1785018843945500672
author Aunins, Aaron A.
Mueller, Sara J.
Fike, Jennifer A.
Cornman, Robert S.
author_facet Aunins, Aaron A.
Mueller, Sara J.
Fike, Jennifer A.
Cornman, Robert S.
author_sort Aunins, Aaron A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Benthic invertebrate (BI) surveys have been widely used to characterize freshwater environmental quality but can be challenging to implement at desired spatial scales and frequency. Environmental DNA (eDNA) allows an alternative BI survey approach, one that can potentially be implemented more rapidly and cheaply than traditional methods. METHODS: We evaluated eDNA analogs of BI metrics in the Potomac River watershed of the eastern United States. We first compared arthropod diversity detected with primers targeting mitochondrial 16S (mt16S) and cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1 or COI) loci to that detected by manual surveys conducted in parallel. We then evaluated spatial and temporal variation in arthropod diversity metrics with repeated sampling in three focal parks. We also investigated technical factors such as filter type used to capture eDNA and PCR inhibition treatment. RESULTS: Our results indicate that genus-level assessment of eDNA compositions is achievable at both loci with modest technical noise, although database gaps remain substantial at mt16S for regional taxa. While the specific taxa identified by eDNA did not strongly overlap with paired manual surveys, some metrics derived from eDNA compositions were rank-correlated with previously derived biological indices of environmental quality. Repeated sampling revealed statistical differences between high- and low-quality sites based on taxonomic diversity, functional diversity, and tolerance scores weighted by taxon proportions in transformed counts. We conclude that eDNA compositions are efficient and informative of stream condition. Further development and validation of scoring schemes analogous to commonly used biological indices should allow increased application of the approach to management needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100694222023-04-04 Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling Aunins, Aaron A. Mueller, Sara J. Fike, Jennifer A. Cornman, Robert S. PeerJ Biodiversity BACKGROUND: Benthic invertebrate (BI) surveys have been widely used to characterize freshwater environmental quality but can be challenging to implement at desired spatial scales and frequency. Environmental DNA (eDNA) allows an alternative BI survey approach, one that can potentially be implemented more rapidly and cheaply than traditional methods. METHODS: We evaluated eDNA analogs of BI metrics in the Potomac River watershed of the eastern United States. We first compared arthropod diversity detected with primers targeting mitochondrial 16S (mt16S) and cytochrome c oxidase 1 (cox1 or COI) loci to that detected by manual surveys conducted in parallel. We then evaluated spatial and temporal variation in arthropod diversity metrics with repeated sampling in three focal parks. We also investigated technical factors such as filter type used to capture eDNA and PCR inhibition treatment. RESULTS: Our results indicate that genus-level assessment of eDNA compositions is achievable at both loci with modest technical noise, although database gaps remain substantial at mt16S for regional taxa. While the specific taxa identified by eDNA did not strongly overlap with paired manual surveys, some metrics derived from eDNA compositions were rank-correlated with previously derived biological indices of environmental quality. Repeated sampling revealed statistical differences between high- and low-quality sites based on taxonomic diversity, functional diversity, and tolerance scores weighted by taxon proportions in transformed counts. We conclude that eDNA compositions are efficient and informative of stream condition. Further development and validation of scoring schemes analogous to commonly used biological indices should allow increased application of the approach to management needs. PeerJ Inc. 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10069422/ /pubmed/37020852 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15163 Text en © 2023 Aunins et al. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/This is an open access article, free of all copyright, made available under the Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) . This work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Aunins, Aaron A.
Mueller, Sara J.
Fike, Jennifer A.
Cornman, Robert S.
Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title_full Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title_fullStr Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title_full_unstemmed Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title_short Assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental DNA: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
title_sort assessing arthropod diversity metrics derived from stream environmental dna: spatiotemporal variation and paired comparisons with manual sampling
topic Biodiversity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37020852
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15163
work_keys_str_mv AT auninsaarona assessingarthropoddiversitymetricsderivedfromstreamenvironmentaldnaspatiotemporalvariationandpairedcomparisonswithmanualsampling
AT muellersaraj assessingarthropoddiversitymetricsderivedfromstreamenvironmentaldnaspatiotemporalvariationandpairedcomparisonswithmanualsampling
AT fikejennifera assessingarthropoddiversitymetricsderivedfromstreamenvironmentaldnaspatiotemporalvariationandpairedcomparisonswithmanualsampling
AT cornmanroberts assessingarthropoddiversitymetricsderivedfromstreamenvironmentaldnaspatiotemporalvariationandpairedcomparisonswithmanualsampling