Cargando…
Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: There are unmet mental health needs of depressed adolescents and young adults (AYAs) across the USA. Behavioural technology adequately integrated into clinical care delivery has potential to improve care access and efficiency. This multisite randomised controlled trial evaluates how a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067141 |
_version_ | 1785018860494127104 |
---|---|
author | Szigethy, Eva Wolfson, David Sinclair-McBride, Keneisha Williams, Kelly Jhe, Grace Lee, Erica H Bialostozky, Mario Wallace, Meredith Bhatnagar, Sonika Demaso, DR Yealy, Donald M Hollenbach, Kathryn |
author_facet | Szigethy, Eva Wolfson, David Sinclair-McBride, Keneisha Williams, Kelly Jhe, Grace Lee, Erica H Bialostozky, Mario Wallace, Meredith Bhatnagar, Sonika Demaso, DR Yealy, Donald M Hollenbach, Kathryn |
author_sort | Szigethy, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There are unmet mental health needs of depressed adolescents and young adults (AYAs) across the USA. Behavioural technology adequately integrated into clinical care delivery has potential to improve care access and efficiency. This multisite randomised controlled trial evaluates how a coach-enhanced digital cognitive behavioural intervention (dCBI) enhances usual care for depressed AYAs in paediatric practices with minority enriched samples. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=750) ages 16–22 who meet threshold criteria for depressive severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9 score 10-24) will be recruited through paediatric practices across three academic institutions (Boston, Pittsburgh and San Diego). Participants will be randomised to 12 weeks of dCBI+treatment as usual (TAU) (n=450) or TAU alone (n=300) in outpatient paediatric practices. Assessments will be completed at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks with the primary outcome being improvement in clinician-rated and self-reported depressive severity (Children’s Depression Rating Scale—Revised and PHQ-9) and secondary outcomes being self-reported suicidal ideation (item 9 on PHQ-9), anxiety severity (Generalised Anxiety Disorder), general quality of life (Satisfaction with Life Scale) and general functioning (Children’s Global Assessment Scale). The study design is an intent-to-treat mixed effects regression with group, and covariates nested within the sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants or their parent/guardian (under 18 years or unemancipated) will give informed consent to a study team member. All data are expected to be collected over 18 months. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a board at each institution in the United States that reviews and monitors research involving human subjects. IRB approval from the University of Pittsburgh was obtained on 30 November 2021 (STUDY21080150), from the University of California San Diego’s Human Research Protection Program IRB on 14 July 2022 (802047), and from the Boston Children’s Hospital IRB on 25 October 2022 (P00040987). Full study results are planned to be published within 2 years of initial study recruitment (October 2024). Dissemination of findings will occur in peer-reviewed journals, professional conferences and through reports to participating entities and stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05159713; ClinicalTrials.gov |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100695022023-04-04 Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial Szigethy, Eva Wolfson, David Sinclair-McBride, Keneisha Williams, Kelly Jhe, Grace Lee, Erica H Bialostozky, Mario Wallace, Meredith Bhatnagar, Sonika Demaso, DR Yealy, Donald M Hollenbach, Kathryn BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: There are unmet mental health needs of depressed adolescents and young adults (AYAs) across the USA. Behavioural technology adequately integrated into clinical care delivery has potential to improve care access and efficiency. This multisite randomised controlled trial evaluates how a coach-enhanced digital cognitive behavioural intervention (dCBI) enhances usual care for depressed AYAs in paediatric practices with minority enriched samples. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants (n=750) ages 16–22 who meet threshold criteria for depressive severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9 score 10-24) will be recruited through paediatric practices across three academic institutions (Boston, Pittsburgh and San Diego). Participants will be randomised to 12 weeks of dCBI+treatment as usual (TAU) (n=450) or TAU alone (n=300) in outpatient paediatric practices. Assessments will be completed at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks with the primary outcome being improvement in clinician-rated and self-reported depressive severity (Children’s Depression Rating Scale—Revised and PHQ-9) and secondary outcomes being self-reported suicidal ideation (item 9 on PHQ-9), anxiety severity (Generalised Anxiety Disorder), general quality of life (Satisfaction with Life Scale) and general functioning (Children’s Global Assessment Scale). The study design is an intent-to-treat mixed effects regression with group, and covariates nested within the sites. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All participants or their parent/guardian (under 18 years or unemancipated) will give informed consent to a study team member. All data are expected to be collected over 18 months. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a board at each institution in the United States that reviews and monitors research involving human subjects. IRB approval from the University of Pittsburgh was obtained on 30 November 2021 (STUDY21080150), from the University of California San Diego’s Human Research Protection Program IRB on 14 July 2022 (802047), and from the Boston Children’s Hospital IRB on 25 October 2022 (P00040987). Full study results are planned to be published within 2 years of initial study recruitment (October 2024). Dissemination of findings will occur in peer-reviewed journals, professional conferences and through reports to participating entities and stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05159713; ClinicalTrials.gov BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10069502/ /pubmed/37001917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067141 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Szigethy, Eva Wolfson, David Sinclair-McBride, Keneisha Williams, Kelly Jhe, Grace Lee, Erica H Bialostozky, Mario Wallace, Meredith Bhatnagar, Sonika Demaso, DR Yealy, Donald M Hollenbach, Kathryn Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title | Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy of a digital mental health intervention embedded in routine care compared with treatment as usual in adolescents and young adults with moderate depressive symptoms: protocol for randomised controlled trial |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT szigethyeva efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wolfsondavid efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sinclairmcbridekeneisha efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT williamskelly efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jhegrace efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leeericah efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bialostozkymario efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wallacemeredith efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bhatnagarsonika efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT demasodr efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT yealydonaldm efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hollenbachkathryn efficacyofadigitalmentalhealthinterventionembeddedinroutinecarecomparedwithtreatmentasusualinadolescentsandyoungadultswithmoderatedepressivesymptomsprotocolforrandomisedcontrolledtrial |