Cargando…
Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services
Essential packages of health services (EPHS) are a critical tool for achieving universal health coverage, especially in low-income and lower middle-income countries. However, there is a lack of guidance and standards for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of EPHS implementation. This paper is the f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010726 |
_version_ | 1785018865202233344 |
---|---|
author | Danforth, Kristen Ahmad, Ahsan Maqbool Blanchet, Karl Khalid, Muhammad Means, Arianna Rubin Memirie, Solomon Tessema Alwan, Ala Watkins, David |
author_facet | Danforth, Kristen Ahmad, Ahsan Maqbool Blanchet, Karl Khalid, Muhammad Means, Arianna Rubin Memirie, Solomon Tessema Alwan, Ala Watkins, David |
author_sort | Danforth, Kristen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Essential packages of health services (EPHS) are a critical tool for achieving universal health coverage, especially in low-income and lower middle-income countries. However, there is a lack of guidance and standards for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of EPHS implementation. This paper is the final in a series of papers reviewing experiences using evidence from the Disease Control Priorities, third edition publications in EPHS reforms in seven countries. We assess current approaches to EPHS M&E, including case studies of M&E approaches in Ethiopia and Pakistan. We propose a step-by-step process for developing a national EPHS M&E framework. Such a framework would start with a theory of change that links to the specific health system reforms the EPHS is trying to accomplish, including explicit statements about the ‘what’ and ‘for whom’ of M&E efforts. Monitoring frameworks need to consider the additional demands that could be placed on weak and already overstretched data systems, and they must ensure that processes are put in place to act quickly on emergent implementation challenges. Evaluation frameworks could learn from the field of implementation science; for example, by adapting the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework to policy implementation. While each country will need to develop its own locally relevant M&E indicators, we encourage all countries to include a set of core indicators that are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goal 3 targets and indicators. Our paper concludes with a call to reprioritise M&E more generally and to use the EPHS process as an opportunity for strengthening national health information systems. We call for an international learning network on EPHS M&E to generate new evidence and exchange best practices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100695252023-04-04 Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services Danforth, Kristen Ahmad, Ahsan Maqbool Blanchet, Karl Khalid, Muhammad Means, Arianna Rubin Memirie, Solomon Tessema Alwan, Ala Watkins, David BMJ Glob Health Practice Essential packages of health services (EPHS) are a critical tool for achieving universal health coverage, especially in low-income and lower middle-income countries. However, there is a lack of guidance and standards for monitoring and evaluation (M&E) of EPHS implementation. This paper is the final in a series of papers reviewing experiences using evidence from the Disease Control Priorities, third edition publications in EPHS reforms in seven countries. We assess current approaches to EPHS M&E, including case studies of M&E approaches in Ethiopia and Pakistan. We propose a step-by-step process for developing a national EPHS M&E framework. Such a framework would start with a theory of change that links to the specific health system reforms the EPHS is trying to accomplish, including explicit statements about the ‘what’ and ‘for whom’ of M&E efforts. Monitoring frameworks need to consider the additional demands that could be placed on weak and already overstretched data systems, and they must ensure that processes are put in place to act quickly on emergent implementation challenges. Evaluation frameworks could learn from the field of implementation science; for example, by adapting the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework to policy implementation. While each country will need to develop its own locally relevant M&E indicators, we encourage all countries to include a set of core indicators that are aligned with the Sustainable Development Goal 3 targets and indicators. Our paper concludes with a call to reprioritise M&E more generally and to use the EPHS process as an opportunity for strengthening national health information systems. We call for an international learning network on EPHS M&E to generate new evidence and exchange best practices. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10069525/ /pubmed/36977532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010726 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Practice Danforth, Kristen Ahmad, Ahsan Maqbool Blanchet, Karl Khalid, Muhammad Means, Arianna Rubin Memirie, Solomon Tessema Alwan, Ala Watkins, David Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title | Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title_full | Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title_fullStr | Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title_short | Monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
title_sort | monitoring and evaluating the implementation of essential packages of health services |
topic | Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010726 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT danforthkristen monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT ahmadahsanmaqbool monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT blanchetkarl monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT khalidmuhammad monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT meansariannarubin monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT memiriesolomontessema monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT alwanala monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices AT watkinsdavid monitoringandevaluatingtheimplementationofessentialpackagesofhealthservices |