Cargando…
Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369 |
_version_ | 1785018866377687040 |
---|---|
author | Parmar, Kat L O'Reilly, Derek Valle, Juan Braun, Michael Malcomson, Lee Jones, Robert P Balaa, Fady Rees, Myrddin Welsh, Fenella K S Filobbos, Rafik Renehan, Andrew G |
author_facet | Parmar, Kat L O'Reilly, Derek Valle, Juan Braun, Michael Malcomson, Lee Jones, Robert P Balaa, Fady Rees, Myrddin Welsh, Fenella K S Filobbos, Rafik Renehan, Andrew G |
author_sort | Parmar, Kat L |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey: Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria. Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews. Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire. Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey. The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100695422023-04-04 Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making Parmar, Kat L O'Reilly, Derek Valle, Juan Braun, Michael Malcomson, Lee Jones, Robert P Balaa, Fady Rees, Myrddin Welsh, Fenella K S Filobbos, Rafik Renehan, Andrew G BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey: Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria. Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews. Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire. Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey. The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10069542/ /pubmed/36997247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Oncology Parmar, Kat L O'Reilly, Derek Valle, Juan Braun, Michael Malcomson, Lee Jones, Robert P Balaa, Fady Rees, Myrddin Welsh, Fenella K S Filobbos, Rafik Renehan, Andrew G Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title | Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title_full | Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title_fullStr | Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title_short | Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
title_sort | protocol for the conor study: a prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parmarkatl protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT oreillyderek protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT vallejuan protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT braunmichael protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT malcomsonlee protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT jonesrobertp protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT balaafady protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT reesmyrddin protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT welshfenellaks protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT filobbosrafik protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking AT renehanandrewg protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking |