Cargando…

Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making

INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parmar, Kat L, O'Reilly, Derek, Valle, Juan, Braun, Michael, Malcomson, Lee, Jones, Robert P, Balaa, Fady, Rees, Myrddin, Welsh, Fenella K S, Filobbos, Rafik, Renehan, Andrew G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369
_version_ 1785018866377687040
author Parmar, Kat L
O'Reilly, Derek
Valle, Juan
Braun, Michael
Malcomson, Lee
Jones, Robert P
Balaa, Fady
Rees, Myrddin
Welsh, Fenella K S
Filobbos, Rafik
Renehan, Andrew G
author_facet Parmar, Kat L
O'Reilly, Derek
Valle, Juan
Braun, Michael
Malcomson, Lee
Jones, Robert P
Balaa, Fady
Rees, Myrddin
Welsh, Fenella K S
Filobbos, Rafik
Renehan, Andrew G
author_sort Parmar, Kat L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey: Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria. Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews. Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire. Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey. The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100695422023-04-04 Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making Parmar, Kat L O'Reilly, Derek Valle, Juan Braun, Michael Malcomson, Lee Jones, Robert P Balaa, Fady Rees, Myrddin Welsh, Fenella K S Filobbos, Rafik Renehan, Andrew G BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Resectability decision-making is therefore a key determinant of outcomes. Wide variation has been demonstrated in resectability decision-making, despite the existence of criteria. This paper summarises a study protocol to evaluate the potential added value of two novel assessment tools in assessing CLM technical resectability: the Hepatica preoperative MR scan (MR-based volumetry, Couinaud segmentation, liver tissue characteristics and operative planning tool) and the LiMAx test (hepatic functional capacity). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study uses a systematic multistep approach, whereby three preparatory workstreams aid the design of the final international case-based scenario survey: Workstream 1: systematic literature review of published resectability criteria. Workstream 2: international hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) interviews. Workstream 3: international HPB questionnaire. Workstream 4: international HPB case-based scenario survey. The primary outcome measures are change in resectability decision-making and change in planned operative strategy, resulting from the novel test results. Secondary outcome measures are variability in CLM resectability decision-making and opinions on the role for novel tools. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by a National Health Service Research Ethics Committee and registered with the Health Research Authority. Dissemination will be via international and national conferences. Manuscripts will be published. REGISTRATION DETAILS: The CoNoR Study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number NCT04270851). The systematic review is registered on the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42019136748). BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10069542/ /pubmed/36997247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Oncology
Parmar, Kat L
O'Reilly, Derek
Valle, Juan
Braun, Michael
Malcomson, Lee
Jones, Robert P
Balaa, Fady
Rees, Myrddin
Welsh, Fenella K S
Filobbos, Rafik
Renehan, Andrew G
Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title_full Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title_fullStr Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title_short Protocol for the CoNoR Study: A prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
title_sort protocol for the conor study: a prospective multi-step study of the potential added benefit of two novel assessment tools in colorectal liver metastases technical resectability decision-making
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059369
work_keys_str_mv AT parmarkatl protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT oreillyderek protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT vallejuan protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT braunmichael protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT malcomsonlee protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT jonesrobertp protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT balaafady protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT reesmyrddin protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT welshfenellaks protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT filobbosrafik protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking
AT renehanandrewg protocolfortheconorstudyaprospectivemultistepstudyofthepotentialaddedbenefitoftwonovelassessmenttoolsincolorectallivermetastasestechnicalresectabilitydecisionmaking