Cargando…
Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study
OBJECTIVES: Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067066 |
_version_ | 1785018868087914496 |
---|---|
author | Bardou, Marc Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas Godard-Marceau, Aurélie Deruelle, Philippe Virtos, Claude Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid Debras, Elodie Schmitz, Thomas |
author_facet | Bardou, Marc Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas Godard-Marceau, Aurélie Deruelle, Philippe Virtos, Claude Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid Debras, Elodie Schmitz, Thomas |
author_sort | Bardou, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns. DESIGN: Prospective qualitative research. SETTING: We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth. RESULTS: Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT. CONCLUSIONS: In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby’s birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02402855 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069550 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100695502023-04-04 Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study Bardou, Marc Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas Godard-Marceau, Aurélie Deruelle, Philippe Virtos, Claude Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid Debras, Elodie Schmitz, Thomas BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVES: Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns. DESIGN: Prospective qualitative research. SETTING: We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial. PARTICIPANTS: 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs. INTERVENTIONS: We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth. RESULTS: Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT. CONCLUSIONS: In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby’s birth. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02402855 BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10069550/ /pubmed/36990483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067066 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Qualitative Research Bardou, Marc Meunier-Beillard, Nicolas Godard-Marceau, Aurélie Deruelle, Philippe Virtos, Claude Eckman-Lacroix, Astrid Debras, Elodie Schmitz, Thomas Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title | Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title_full | Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title_fullStr | Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title_short | Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study |
title_sort | women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the naitre randomised controlled study |
topic | Qualitative Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36990483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bardoumarc womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT meunierbeillardnicolas womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT godardmarceauaurelie womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT deruellephilippe womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT virtosclaude womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT eckmanlacroixastrid womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT debraselodie womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT schmitzthomas womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy AT womenandhealthprofessionalsperspectivesonaconditionalcashtransferprogrammetoimprovepregnancyfollowupaqualitativeanalysisofthenaitrerandomisedcontrolledstudy |