Cargando…

Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives regarding their mental health. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental controlled trial with measurements at three time points (baseline, after 2 weeks and after 12 weeks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lingens, Solveigh Paola, Schilling, Georgia, Schulz, Holger, Bleich, Christiane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068963
_version_ 1785018875980546048
author Lingens, Solveigh Paola
Schilling, Georgia
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
author_facet Lingens, Solveigh Paola
Schilling, Georgia
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
author_sort Lingens, Solveigh Paola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives regarding their mental health. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental controlled trial with measurements at three time points (baseline, after 2 weeks and after 12 weeks). SETTING: The intervention group (IG) was recruited at two cancer counselling centres in Germany. The control group (CG) included patients with cancer or relatives who did not seek support. PARTICIPANTS: In total, n=885 participants were recruited and n=459 were eligible for the analysis (IG, n=264; CG, n=195). INTERVENTION: One to two psychosocial support sessions (approximately hour) provided by a psycho-oncologist or social worker. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was distress. The secondary outcomes were anxiety and depressive symptoms, well-being, cancer-specific and generic quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy and fatigue. RESULTS: The linear mixed model analysis showed significant differences between IG and CG at follow-up for distress (d=0.36), p=0.001), depressive (d=0.22), p=0.005) and anxiety symptoms (d=0.22), p=0.003), well-being (d=0.26, p=0.002), QoL (QoL mental; d=0.26, p=0.003), self-efficacy (d=0.21, p=0.011) and QoL (global; d=0.27, p=0.009). The changes were not significant for QoL (physical; d=0.04, p=0.618), cancer-specific QoL (symptoms; d=0.13, p=0.093), cancer-specific QoL (functional; d=0.08, p=0.274) and fatigue (d=0.04, p=0.643). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that brief psychosocial support is associated with the improvement of mental health of patients with cancer and their relatives after 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015516.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100695882023-04-04 Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres Lingens, Solveigh Paola Schilling, Georgia Schulz, Holger Bleich, Christiane BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives regarding their mental health. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental controlled trial with measurements at three time points (baseline, after 2 weeks and after 12 weeks). SETTING: The intervention group (IG) was recruited at two cancer counselling centres in Germany. The control group (CG) included patients with cancer or relatives who did not seek support. PARTICIPANTS: In total, n=885 participants were recruited and n=459 were eligible for the analysis (IG, n=264; CG, n=195). INTERVENTION: One to two psychosocial support sessions (approximately hour) provided by a psycho-oncologist or social worker. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was distress. The secondary outcomes were anxiety and depressive symptoms, well-being, cancer-specific and generic quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy and fatigue. RESULTS: The linear mixed model analysis showed significant differences between IG and CG at follow-up for distress (d=0.36), p=0.001), depressive (d=0.22), p=0.005) and anxiety symptoms (d=0.22), p=0.003), well-being (d=0.26, p=0.002), QoL (QoL mental; d=0.26, p=0.003), self-efficacy (d=0.21, p=0.011) and QoL (global; d=0.27, p=0.009). The changes were not significant for QoL (physical; d=0.04, p=0.618), cancer-specific QoL (symptoms; d=0.13, p=0.093), cancer-specific QoL (functional; d=0.08, p=0.274) and fatigue (d=0.04, p=0.643). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that brief psychosocial support is associated with the improvement of mental health of patients with cancer and their relatives after 3 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015516. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10069588/ /pubmed/36977537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068963 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Lingens, Solveigh Paola
Schilling, Georgia
Schulz, Holger
Bleich, Christiane
Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title_full Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title_fullStr Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title_short Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
title_sort effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36977537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068963
work_keys_str_mv AT lingenssolveighpaola effectivenessofbriefpsychosocialsupportforpatientswithcancerandtheirrelativesaquasiexperimentalevaluationofcancercounsellingcentres
AT schillinggeorgia effectivenessofbriefpsychosocialsupportforpatientswithcancerandtheirrelativesaquasiexperimentalevaluationofcancercounsellingcentres
AT schulzholger effectivenessofbriefpsychosocialsupportforpatientswithcancerandtheirrelativesaquasiexperimentalevaluationofcancercounsellingcentres
AT bleichchristiane effectivenessofbriefpsychosocialsupportforpatientswithcancerandtheirrelativesaquasiexperimentalevaluationofcancercounsellingcentres