Cargando…

What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As more therapeutic options with their own characteristics become available for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], drug development and individual treatment decision-making needs to be tailored towards patients’ preferences and needs. This study aimed to understand patient prefer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schoefs, Elise, Vermeire, Séverine, Ferrante, Marc, Sabino, João, Lambrechts, Tessy, Avedano, Luisa, Haaf, Isabella, De Rocchis, Maria Stella, Broggi, Andrea, Sajak-Szczerba, Magdalena, Saldaña, Roberto, Janssens, Rosanne, Huys, Isabelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac145
_version_ 1785018881392246784
author Schoefs, Elise
Vermeire, Séverine
Ferrante, Marc
Sabino, João
Lambrechts, Tessy
Avedano, Luisa
Haaf, Isabella
De Rocchis, Maria Stella
Broggi, Andrea
Sajak-Szczerba, Magdalena
Saldaña, Roberto
Janssens, Rosanne
Huys, Isabelle
author_facet Schoefs, Elise
Vermeire, Séverine
Ferrante, Marc
Sabino, João
Lambrechts, Tessy
Avedano, Luisa
Haaf, Isabella
De Rocchis, Maria Stella
Broggi, Andrea
Sajak-Szczerba, Magdalena
Saldaña, Roberto
Janssens, Rosanne
Huys, Isabelle
author_sort Schoefs, Elise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As more therapeutic options with their own characteristics become available for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], drug development and individual treatment decision-making needs to be tailored towards patients’ preferences and needs. This study aimed to understand patient preferences among IBD patients, and their most important treatment outcomes and unmet needs. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of [1] a scoping literature review, [2] two focus group discussions [FGDs] with IBD patients [n = 11] using the nominal group technique, and [3] two expert panel discussions. RESULTS: IBD patients discussed a multitude of unmet needs regarding their symptoms, side-effects, and psychological and social issues for which they would welcome improved outcomes. In particular, IBD patients elaborated on the uncertainties and fears they experienced regarding the possible need for surgery or an ostomy, the effectiveness and onset of action of their medication, and the medication’s long-term effects. Furthermore, participants extensively discussed the mental impact of IBD and their need for more psychological guidance, support, and improved information and communication with healthcare workers regarding their disease and emotional wellbeing. The following five characteristics were identified during the attribute grading as most important: prevent surgery, long-term clinical remission, improved quality of life [QoL], occurrence of urgency and improved labour rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IBD drug development and treatment decision-making are needed to improve IBD symptoms and adverse events that significantly impact IBD patients’ QoL. Furthermore, this study underlines patients’ need for a shared decision-making process in which their desired treatment outcomes and uncertainties are explicitly discussed and considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100696112023-04-04 What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study Schoefs, Elise Vermeire, Séverine Ferrante, Marc Sabino, João Lambrechts, Tessy Avedano, Luisa Haaf, Isabella De Rocchis, Maria Stella Broggi, Andrea Sajak-Szczerba, Magdalena Saldaña, Roberto Janssens, Rosanne Huys, Isabelle J Crohns Colitis Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As more therapeutic options with their own characteristics become available for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], drug development and individual treatment decision-making needs to be tailored towards patients’ preferences and needs. This study aimed to understand patient preferences among IBD patients, and their most important treatment outcomes and unmet needs. METHODS: This qualitative study consisted of [1] a scoping literature review, [2] two focus group discussions [FGDs] with IBD patients [n = 11] using the nominal group technique, and [3] two expert panel discussions. RESULTS: IBD patients discussed a multitude of unmet needs regarding their symptoms, side-effects, and psychological and social issues for which they would welcome improved outcomes. In particular, IBD patients elaborated on the uncertainties and fears they experienced regarding the possible need for surgery or an ostomy, the effectiveness and onset of action of their medication, and the medication’s long-term effects. Furthermore, participants extensively discussed the mental impact of IBD and their need for more psychological guidance, support, and improved information and communication with healthcare workers regarding their disease and emotional wellbeing. The following five characteristics were identified during the attribute grading as most important: prevent surgery, long-term clinical remission, improved quality of life [QoL], occurrence of urgency and improved labour rate. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that IBD drug development and treatment decision-making are needed to improve IBD symptoms and adverse events that significantly impact IBD patients’ QoL. Furthermore, this study underlines patients’ need for a shared decision-making process in which their desired treatment outcomes and uncertainties are explicitly discussed and considered. Oxford University Press 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10069611/ /pubmed/36165579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac145 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schoefs, Elise
Vermeire, Séverine
Ferrante, Marc
Sabino, João
Lambrechts, Tessy
Avedano, Luisa
Haaf, Isabella
De Rocchis, Maria Stella
Broggi, Andrea
Sajak-Szczerba, Magdalena
Saldaña, Roberto
Janssens, Rosanne
Huys, Isabelle
What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title_full What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title_fullStr What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title_full_unstemmed What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title_short What are the Unmet Needs and Most Relevant Treatment Outcomes According to Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease? A Qualitative Patient Preference Study
title_sort what are the unmet needs and most relevant treatment outcomes according to patients with inflammatory bowel disease? a qualitative patient preference study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac145
work_keys_str_mv AT schoefselise whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT vermeireseverine whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT ferrantemarc whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT sabinojoao whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT lambrechtstessy whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT avedanoluisa whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT haafisabella whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT derocchismariastella whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT broggiandrea whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT sajakszczerbamagdalena whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT saldanaroberto whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT janssensrosanne whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy
AT huysisabelle whataretheunmetneedsandmostrelevanttreatmentoutcomesaccordingtopatientswithinflammatoryboweldiseaseaqualitativepatientpreferencestudy