Cargando…

Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the sigmoid take-off definition might lead to a shift from rectal cancers to sigmoid cancers. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical impact of the new definition. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burghgraef, Thijs A, Hol, Jeroen C, Rutgers, Marieke L, Brown, Gina, Hompes, Roel, Sietses, Colin, Consten, Esther C J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad018
_version_ 1785018892139102208
author Burghgraef, Thijs A
Hol, Jeroen C
Rutgers, Marieke L
Brown, Gina
Hompes, Roel
Sietses, Colin
Consten, Esther C J
author_facet Burghgraef, Thijs A
Hol, Jeroen C
Rutgers, Marieke L
Brown, Gina
Hompes, Roel
Sietses, Colin
Consten, Esther C J
author_sort Burghgraef, Thijs A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of the sigmoid take-off definition might lead to a shift from rectal cancers to sigmoid cancers. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical impact of the new definition. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they underwent an elective, curative total mesorectal excision for non-metastasized rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2017, were registered in the Dutch Colorectal Audit as having a rectal cancer according to the previous definition, and if MRI was available. All selected rectal cancer cases were reassessed using the sigmoid take-off definition. The primary outcome was the number of patients reassessed with a sigmoid cancer. Secondary outcomes included differences between the newly defined rectal and sigmoid cancer patients in treatment, perioperative results, and 3-year oncological outcomes (overall and disease-free survivals, and local and systemic recurrences). RESULTS: Out of 1742 eligible patients, 1302 rectal cancer patients were included. Of these, 170 (13.1 per cent) were reclassified as having sigmoid cancer. Among these, 93 patients (54.7 per cent) would have been offered another adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment according to the Dutch guideline. Patients with a sigmoid tumour after reassessment had a lower 30-day postoperative complication rate (33.5 versus 48.3 per cent, P < 0.001), lower reintervention rate (8.8 versus 17.4 per cent, P < 0.007), and a shorter length of stay (a median of 5 days (i.q.r. 4–7) versus a median of 6 days (i.q.r. 5–9), P < 0.001). Three-year oncological outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSION: Using the anatomical landmark of the sigmoid take-off, 13.1 per cent of the previously classified patients with rectal cancer had sigmoid cancer, and 54.7 per cent of these patients would have been treated differently with regard to neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100696622023-04-04 Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study Burghgraef, Thijs A Hol, Jeroen C Rutgers, Marieke L Brown, Gina Hompes, Roel Sietses, Colin Consten, Esther C J BJS Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The introduction of the sigmoid take-off definition might lead to a shift from rectal cancers to sigmoid cancers. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the clinical impact of the new definition. METHODS: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they underwent an elective, curative total mesorectal excision for non-metastasized rectal cancer between January 2015 and December 2017, were registered in the Dutch Colorectal Audit as having a rectal cancer according to the previous definition, and if MRI was available. All selected rectal cancer cases were reassessed using the sigmoid take-off definition. The primary outcome was the number of patients reassessed with a sigmoid cancer. Secondary outcomes included differences between the newly defined rectal and sigmoid cancer patients in treatment, perioperative results, and 3-year oncological outcomes (overall and disease-free survivals, and local and systemic recurrences). RESULTS: Out of 1742 eligible patients, 1302 rectal cancer patients were included. Of these, 170 (13.1 per cent) were reclassified as having sigmoid cancer. Among these, 93 patients (54.7 per cent) would have been offered another adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment according to the Dutch guideline. Patients with a sigmoid tumour after reassessment had a lower 30-day postoperative complication rate (33.5 versus 48.3 per cent, P < 0.001), lower reintervention rate (8.8 versus 17.4 per cent, P < 0.007), and a shorter length of stay (a median of 5 days (i.q.r. 4–7) versus a median of 6 days (i.q.r. 5–9), P < 0.001). Three-year oncological outcomes were comparable. CONCLUSION: Using the anatomical landmark of the sigmoid take-off, 13.1 per cent of the previously classified patients with rectal cancer had sigmoid cancer, and 54.7 per cent of these patients would have been treated differently with regard to neoadjuvant therapy or adjuvant therapy. Oxford University Press 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10069662/ /pubmed/37011059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad018 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Burghgraef, Thijs A
Hol, Jeroen C
Rutgers, Marieke L
Brown, Gina
Hompes, Roel
Sietses, Colin
Consten, Esther C J
Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title_full Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title_fullStr Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title_short Implications of the new MRI-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
title_sort implications of the new mri-based rectum definition according to the sigmoid take-off: multicentre cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011059
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad018
work_keys_str_mv AT burghgraefthijsa implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT holjeroenc implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT rutgersmariekel implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT browngina implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT hompesroel implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT sietsescolin implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT constenesthercj implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy
AT implicationsofthenewmribasedrectumdefinitionaccordingtothesigmoidtakeoffmulticentrecohortstudy