Cargando…
Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597 |
_version_ | 1785018910467162112 |
---|---|
author | Bishop, Karen Balogun, Saliu Eynstone-Hinkins, James Moran, Lauren Martin, Melonie Banks, Emily Rao, Chalapati Joshy, Grace |
author_facet | Bishop, Karen Balogun, Saliu Eynstone-Hinkins, James Moran, Lauren Martin, Melonie Banks, Emily Rao, Chalapati Joshy, Grace |
author_sort | Bishop, Karen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—is recognized internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant analytical methods and practices related to multiple causes. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their incept ion to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles analyzed multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 items of which we reviewed 434 full-text articles. RESULTS: Most articles we reviewed (76%, n = 332) were published since 2001. The majority of articles examined mortality by “any– mention” of the cause of death (87%, n = 377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (57%, n = 245). Since 2001, applications of methods emerged to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n = 9), and application of multiple-cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n = 5). We describe multiple-cause methods applied to specific research objectives for approaches emerging recently. CONCLUSION: This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview, to our knowledge, of methods and practices to date. Available multiple-cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives. With greater availability of data and technology, these could be further developed and applied across a range of settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10069753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100697532023-04-04 Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices Bishop, Karen Balogun, Saliu Eynstone-Hinkins, James Moran, Lauren Martin, Melonie Banks, Emily Rao, Chalapati Joshy, Grace Epidemiology Methods Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—is recognized internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant analytical methods and practices related to multiple causes. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their incept ion to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles analyzed multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 items of which we reviewed 434 full-text articles. RESULTS: Most articles we reviewed (76%, n = 332) were published since 2001. The majority of articles examined mortality by “any– mention” of the cause of death (87%, n = 377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (57%, n = 245). Since 2001, applications of methods emerged to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n = 9), and application of multiple-cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n = 5). We describe multiple-cause methods applied to specific research objectives for approaches emerging recently. CONCLUSION: This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview, to our knowledge, of methods and practices to date. Available multiple-cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives. With greater availability of data and technology, these could be further developed and applied across a range of settings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-31 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10069753/ /pubmed/36719759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Methods Bishop, Karen Balogun, Saliu Eynstone-Hinkins, James Moran, Lauren Martin, Melonie Banks, Emily Rao, Chalapati Joshy, Grace Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title | Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title_full | Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title_short | Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices |
title_sort | analysis of multiple causes of death: a review of methods and practices |
topic | Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bishopkaren analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT balogunsaliu analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT eynstonehinkinsjames analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT moranlauren analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT martinmelonie analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT banksemily analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT raochalapati analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices AT joshygrace analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices |