Cargando…

Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices

Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bishop, Karen, Balogun, Saliu, Eynstone-Hinkins, James, Moran, Lauren, Martin, Melonie, Banks, Emily, Rao, Chalapati, Joshy, Grace
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597
_version_ 1785018910467162112
author Bishop, Karen
Balogun, Saliu
Eynstone-Hinkins, James
Moran, Lauren
Martin, Melonie
Banks, Emily
Rao, Chalapati
Joshy, Grace
author_facet Bishop, Karen
Balogun, Saliu
Eynstone-Hinkins, James
Moran, Lauren
Martin, Melonie
Banks, Emily
Rao, Chalapati
Joshy, Grace
author_sort Bishop, Karen
collection PubMed
description Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—is recognized internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant analytical methods and practices related to multiple causes. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their incept ion to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles analyzed multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 items of which we reviewed 434 full-text articles. RESULTS: Most articles we reviewed (76%, n = 332) were published since 2001. The majority of articles examined mortality by “any– mention” of the cause of death (87%, n = 377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (57%, n = 245). Since 2001, applications of methods emerged to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n = 9), and application of multiple-cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n = 5). We describe multiple-cause methods applied to specific research objectives for approaches emerging recently. CONCLUSION: This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview, to our knowledge, of methods and practices to date. Available multiple-cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives. With greater availability of data and technology, these could be further developed and applied across a range of settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100697532023-04-04 Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices Bishop, Karen Balogun, Saliu Eynstone-Hinkins, James Moran, Lauren Martin, Melonie Banks, Emily Rao, Chalapati Joshy, Grace Epidemiology Methods Research and reporting of mortality indicators typically focus on a single underlying cause of death selected from multiple causes recorded on a death certificate. The need to incorporate the multiple causes in mortality statistics—reflecting increasing multimorbidity and complex causation patterns—is recognized internationally. This review aims to identify and appraise relevant analytical methods and practices related to multiple causes. METHODS: We searched Medline, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from their incept ion to December 2020 without language restrictions, supplemented by consultation with international experts. Eligible articles analyzed multiple causes of death from death certificates. The process identified 4,080 items of which we reviewed 434 full-text articles. RESULTS: Most articles we reviewed (76%, n = 332) were published since 2001. The majority of articles examined mortality by “any– mention” of the cause of death (87%, n = 377) and assessed pairwise combinations of causes (57%, n = 245). Since 2001, applications of methods emerged to group deaths based on common cause patterns using, for example, cluster analysis (2%, n = 9), and application of multiple-cause weights to re-evaluate mortality burden (1%, n = 5). We describe multiple-cause methods applied to specific research objectives for approaches emerging recently. CONCLUSION: This review confirms rapidly increasing international interest in the analysis of multiple causes of death and provides the most comprehensive overview, to our knowledge, of methods and practices to date. Available multiple-cause methods are diverse but suit a range of research objectives. With greater availability of data and technology, these could be further developed and applied across a range of settings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-01-31 2023-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10069753/ /pubmed/36719759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Methods
Bishop, Karen
Balogun, Saliu
Eynstone-Hinkins, James
Moran, Lauren
Martin, Melonie
Banks, Emily
Rao, Chalapati
Joshy, Grace
Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title_full Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title_fullStr Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title_short Analysis of Multiple Causes of Death: A Review of Methods and Practices
title_sort analysis of multiple causes of death: a review of methods and practices
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36719759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001597
work_keys_str_mv AT bishopkaren analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT balogunsaliu analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT eynstonehinkinsjames analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT moranlauren analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT martinmelonie analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT banksemily analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT raochalapati analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices
AT joshygrace analysisofmultiplecausesofdeathareviewofmethodsandpractices