Cargando…

Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study

BACKGROUND: In infertility treatment, blastocyst morphological grading is commonly used in clinical practice for blastocyst evaluation and selection, but has shown limited predictive power on live birth outcomes of blastocysts. To improve live birth prediction, a number of artificial intelligence (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hang, Zhang, Zhuoran, Gu, Yifan, Dai, Changsheng, Shan, Guanqiao, Song, Haocong, Li, Daniel, Chen, Wenyuan, Lin, Ge, Sun, Yu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810139
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83662
_version_ 1785018932660273152
author Liu, Hang
Zhang, Zhuoran
Gu, Yifan
Dai, Changsheng
Shan, Guanqiao
Song, Haocong
Li, Daniel
Chen, Wenyuan
Lin, Ge
Sun, Yu
author_facet Liu, Hang
Zhang, Zhuoran
Gu, Yifan
Dai, Changsheng
Shan, Guanqiao
Song, Haocong
Li, Daniel
Chen, Wenyuan
Lin, Ge
Sun, Yu
author_sort Liu, Hang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In infertility treatment, blastocyst morphological grading is commonly used in clinical practice for blastocyst evaluation and selection, but has shown limited predictive power on live birth outcomes of blastocysts. To improve live birth prediction, a number of artificial intelligence (AI) models have been established. Most existing AI models for blastocyst evaluation only used images for live birth prediction, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) achieved by these models has plateaued at ~0.65. METHODS: This study proposed a multimodal blastocyst evaluation method using both blastocyst images and patient couple’s clinical features (e.g., maternal age, hormone profiles, endometrium thickness, and semen quality) to predict live birth outcomes of human blastocysts. To utilize the multimodal data, we developed a new AI model consisting of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to process blastocyst images and a multilayer perceptron to process patient couple’s clinical features. The data set used in this study consists of 17,580 blastocysts with known live birth outcomes, blastocyst images, and patient couple’s clinical features. RESULTS: This study achieved an AUC of 0.77 for live birth prediction, which significantly outperforms related works in the literature. Sixteen out of 103 clinical features were identified to be predictors of live birth outcomes and helped improve live birth prediction. Among these features, maternal age, the day of blastocyst transfer, antral follicle count, retrieved oocyte number, and endometrium thickness measured before transfer are the top five features contributing to live birth prediction. Heatmaps showed that the CNN in the AI model mainly focuses on image regions of inner cell mass and trophectoderm (TE) for live birth prediction, and the contribution of TE-related features was greater in the CNN trained with the inclusion of patient couple's clinical features compared with the CNN trained with blastocyst images alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the inclusion of patient couple’s clinical features along with blastocyst images increases live birth prediction accuracy. FUNDING: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs Program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10069866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100698662023-04-04 Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study Liu, Hang Zhang, Zhuoran Gu, Yifan Dai, Changsheng Shan, Guanqiao Song, Haocong Li, Daniel Chen, Wenyuan Lin, Ge Sun, Yu eLife Computational and Systems Biology BACKGROUND: In infertility treatment, blastocyst morphological grading is commonly used in clinical practice for blastocyst evaluation and selection, but has shown limited predictive power on live birth outcomes of blastocysts. To improve live birth prediction, a number of artificial intelligence (AI) models have been established. Most existing AI models for blastocyst evaluation only used images for live birth prediction, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) achieved by these models has plateaued at ~0.65. METHODS: This study proposed a multimodal blastocyst evaluation method using both blastocyst images and patient couple’s clinical features (e.g., maternal age, hormone profiles, endometrium thickness, and semen quality) to predict live birth outcomes of human blastocysts. To utilize the multimodal data, we developed a new AI model consisting of a convolutional neural network (CNN) to process blastocyst images and a multilayer perceptron to process patient couple’s clinical features. The data set used in this study consists of 17,580 blastocysts with known live birth outcomes, blastocyst images, and patient couple’s clinical features. RESULTS: This study achieved an AUC of 0.77 for live birth prediction, which significantly outperforms related works in the literature. Sixteen out of 103 clinical features were identified to be predictors of live birth outcomes and helped improve live birth prediction. Among these features, maternal age, the day of blastocyst transfer, antral follicle count, retrieved oocyte number, and endometrium thickness measured before transfer are the top five features contributing to live birth prediction. Heatmaps showed that the CNN in the AI model mainly focuses on image regions of inner cell mass and trophectoderm (TE) for live birth prediction, and the contribution of TE-related features was greater in the CNN trained with the inclusion of patient couple's clinical features compared with the CNN trained with blastocyst images alone. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the inclusion of patient couple’s clinical features along with blastocyst images increases live birth prediction accuracy. FUNDING: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs Program. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10069866/ /pubmed/36810139 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83662 Text en © 2023, Liu, Zhang, Gu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Computational and Systems Biology
Liu, Hang
Zhang, Zhuoran
Gu, Yifan
Dai, Changsheng
Shan, Guanqiao
Song, Haocong
Li, Daniel
Chen, Wenyuan
Lin, Ge
Sun, Yu
Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title_full Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title_fullStr Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title_short Development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
title_sort development and evaluation of a live birth prediction model for evaluating human blastocysts from a retrospective study
topic Computational and Systems Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10069866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36810139
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83662
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhang developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT zhangzhuoran developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT guyifan developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT daichangsheng developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT shanguanqiao developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT songhaocong developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT lidaniel developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT chenwenyuan developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT linge developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy
AT sunyu developmentandevaluationofalivebirthpredictionmodelforevaluatinghumanblastocystsfromaretrospectivestudy