Cargando…
Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years
BACKGROUND: Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017–2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Scientific Scholar
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025530 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_168_2023 |
_version_ | 1785018988689883136 |
---|---|
author | Musa, Gerald Barrientos, Rossi E.C Makirov, Serik K. Chmutin, Gennady E. Antonov, Gennady I. Kim, Alexander V. Otarov, Olzhas |
author_facet | Musa, Gerald Barrientos, Rossi E.C Makirov, Serik K. Chmutin, Gennady E. Antonov, Gennady I. Kim, Alexander V. Otarov, Olzhas |
author_sort | Musa, Gerald |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017–2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone. METHODS: Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears. RESULTS: We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls). CONCLUSION: Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10070263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Scientific Scholar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100702632023-04-05 Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years Musa, Gerald Barrientos, Rossi E.C Makirov, Serik K. Chmutin, Gennady E. Antonov, Gennady I. Kim, Alexander V. Otarov, Olzhas Surg Neurol Int Review Article BACKGROUND: Recurrent disc herniations remain a challenge in spinal surgery. Although some authors recommend a repeat discectomy, others offer more invasive secondary fusions. Here, we reviewed the literature (2017–2022) regarding the safety/efficacy of treating recurrent disc herniations with repeated discectomy alone. METHODS: Our literature search of recurrent lumbar disc herniations included; Medline, PubMed, Google scholar, and the Cochrane database. We focused on the types of discectomy performed, perioperative morbidity, costs, length of surgery, pain scores, and incidence of secondary dural tears. RESULTS: We identified 769 cases that included 126 microdiscectomies, and 643 endoscopic discectomies. Rates of disc recurrence ranged from 1% to 25% with accompanying secondary durotomy varying from 2% to 15%. In addition, operative times were relatively short, ranging from 29.2 min to 125 min, with a relatively small average estimated blood loss (i.e., minimal to maximally 150 mls). CONCLUSION: Repeated discectomy was the most commonly performed treatment for same-level recurrent disc herniations. Despite minimal intraoperative blood loss and short operating times, there was a significant risk of durotomy. Notably, patients must be informed that more extensive bone removal for treating recurrent disc increases the risk for instability warranting subsequent fusion. Scientific Scholar 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10070263/ /pubmed/37025530 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_168_2023 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Musa, Gerald Barrientos, Rossi E.C Makirov, Serik K. Chmutin, Gennady E. Antonov, Gennady I. Kim, Alexander V. Otarov, Olzhas Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title | Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title_full | Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title_fullStr | Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title_short | Repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: A literature review of the past 5 years |
title_sort | repeat discectomy for recurrent same level disc herniation: a literature review of the past 5 years |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025530 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_168_2023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT musagerald repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT barrientosrossiec repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT makirovserikk repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT chmutingennadye repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT antonovgennadyi repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT kimalexanderv repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years AT otarovolzhas repeatdiscectomyforrecurrentsameleveldischerniationaliteraturereviewofthepast5years |