Cargando…

Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) participated in a point of care (POC) device study funded by by the National Institutes of Health and led by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMass) to speed the development, validation, and commercial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daly, Jeanette M., O’Connor, Laurel, Schmidt, Megan E., Ferrara, Laura K., Parang, Kim, Levy, Barcey T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319231164540
_version_ 1785019060636876800
author Daly, Jeanette M.
O’Connor, Laurel
Schmidt, Megan E.
Ferrara, Laura K.
Parang, Kim
Levy, Barcey T.
author_facet Daly, Jeanette M.
O’Connor, Laurel
Schmidt, Megan E.
Ferrara, Laura K.
Parang, Kim
Levy, Barcey T.
author_sort Daly, Jeanette M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) participated in a point of care (POC) device study funded by by the National Institutes of Health and led by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMass) to speed the development, validation, and commercialization of POC tests to detect SARS-CoV-2. The purposes of this study were to describe the characteristics of participating PBRNs and their respective collaborators in this device trial and describe complications challenging its execution. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with lead personnel from participating PBRNs and UMass. RESULTS: Four PBRNs and UMass were invited to participate and 3 PBRNs and UMass participated. This device trial recruited 321 subjects in 6 months; 65 subjects from PBRNs. Each PBRN and the academic medical center site enrolled and recruited subjects differently. Main challenges identified were having adequate clinic personnel to enroll and aid in consent and questionnaire completion, frequently changing inclusion/exclusion criteria, use of the digital electronic data collection platform, and having access to a −80°C freezer to store supplies. DISCUSSION: This trial involved numerous researchers, primary care clinic leaders and staff, and academic center sponsored program staff and attorneys resulting in a resource-intensive endeavor to enroll 65 subjects in the real-world clinical setting of primary care PBRNs with the academic medical center enrolling the rest. Multiple obstacles to standing up the study were encountered by the PBRNS. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care PBRNs rely largely on the goodwill established between academic health centers and participating practices. For future investigations involving device studies, collaborating PBRN leaders should assess whether recruitment criteria may change, obtain detailed lists of equipment needed, and/or know if the study is likely to be halted suddenly to appropriately prepare their member practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10070755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100707552023-04-05 Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2 Daly, Jeanette M. O’Connor, Laurel Schmidt, Megan E. Ferrara, Laura K. Parang, Kim Levy, Barcey T. J Prim Care Community Health Original Research INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Primary care practice-based research networks (PBRNs) participated in a point of care (POC) device study funded by by the National Institutes of Health and led by the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (UMass) to speed the development, validation, and commercialization of POC tests to detect SARS-CoV-2. The purposes of this study were to describe the characteristics of participating PBRNs and their respective collaborators in this device trial and describe complications challenging its execution. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with lead personnel from participating PBRNs and UMass. RESULTS: Four PBRNs and UMass were invited to participate and 3 PBRNs and UMass participated. This device trial recruited 321 subjects in 6 months; 65 subjects from PBRNs. Each PBRN and the academic medical center site enrolled and recruited subjects differently. Main challenges identified were having adequate clinic personnel to enroll and aid in consent and questionnaire completion, frequently changing inclusion/exclusion criteria, use of the digital electronic data collection platform, and having access to a −80°C freezer to store supplies. DISCUSSION: This trial involved numerous researchers, primary care clinic leaders and staff, and academic center sponsored program staff and attorneys resulting in a resource-intensive endeavor to enroll 65 subjects in the real-world clinical setting of primary care PBRNs with the academic medical center enrolling the rest. Multiple obstacles to standing up the study were encountered by the PBRNS. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care PBRNs rely largely on the goodwill established between academic health centers and participating practices. For future investigations involving device studies, collaborating PBRN leaders should assess whether recruitment criteria may change, obtain detailed lists of equipment needed, and/or know if the study is likely to be halted suddenly to appropriately prepare their member practices. SAGE Publications 2023-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10070755/ /pubmed/37005790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319231164540 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Daly, Jeanette M.
O’Connor, Laurel
Schmidt, Megan E.
Ferrara, Laura K.
Parang, Kim
Levy, Barcey T.
Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title_full Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title_short Challenges in Use of Practice-based Research Networks for a Medical Device Trial to Detect SARS-CoV-2
title_sort challenges in use of practice-based research networks for a medical device trial to detect sars-cov-2
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37005790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21501319231164540
work_keys_str_mv AT dalyjeanettem challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2
AT oconnorlaurel challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2
AT schmidtmegane challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2
AT ferraralaurak challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2
AT parangkim challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2
AT levybarceyt challengesinuseofpracticebasedresearchnetworksforamedicaldevicetrialtodetectsarscov2