Cargando…

MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects

INTRODUCTION: Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cortical bone. The signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging, known as porosity index (PI), as well as the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging, known as the suppression ratio (SR), are two ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jerban, Saeed, Ma, Yajun, Moazamian, Dina, Athertya, Jiyo, Dwek, Sophia, Jang, Hyungseok, Woods, Gina, Chung, Christine B., Chang, Eric Y., Du, Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1148345
_version_ 1785019085968375808
author Jerban, Saeed
Ma, Yajun
Moazamian, Dina
Athertya, Jiyo
Dwek, Sophia
Jang, Hyungseok
Woods, Gina
Chung, Christine B.
Chang, Eric Y.
Du, Jiang
author_facet Jerban, Saeed
Ma, Yajun
Moazamian, Dina
Athertya, Jiyo
Dwek, Sophia
Jang, Hyungseok
Woods, Gina
Chung, Christine B.
Chang, Eric Y.
Du, Jiang
author_sort Jerban, Saeed
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cortical bone. The signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging, known as porosity index (PI), as well as the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging, known as the suppression ratio (SR), are two rapid UTE-based bone evaluation techniques developed to reduce the time demand and cost in future clinical studies. The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of PI and SR in detecting bone quality differences between subjects with osteoporosis (OPo), osteopenia (OPe), and normal bone (Normal). METHODS: Tibial midshaft of fourteen OPe (72 ± 6 years old), thirty-one OPo (72 ± 6 years old), and thirty-seven Normal (36 ± 19 years old) subjects were scanned using dual-echo UTE and IR-UTE sequences on a clinical 3T scanner. Measured PI, SR, and bone thickness were compared between OPo, OPe, and normal bone (Normal) subjects using the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score and UTE-MRI results. RESULTS: PI was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (24.1%) and OPe (16.3%) groups. SR was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (41.5%) and OPe (21.8%) groups. SR differences between the OPe and Normal groups were also statistically significant (16.2%). Cortical bone was significantly thinner in the OPo group compared with the Normal (22.0%) and OPe (13.0%) groups. DEXA T-scores in subjects were significantly correlated with PI (R=-0.32), SR (R=-0.50), and bone thickness (R=0.51). DISCUSSION: PI and SR, as rapid UTE-MRI-based techniques, may be useful tools to detect and monitor bone quality changes, in addition to bone morphology, in individuals affected by osteoporosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10070867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-100708672023-04-05 MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects Jerban, Saeed Ma, Yajun Moazamian, Dina Athertya, Jiyo Dwek, Sophia Jang, Hyungseok Woods, Gina Chung, Christine B. Chang, Eric Y. Du, Jiang Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology INTRODUCTION: Ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI enables quantitative assessment of cortical bone. The signal ratio in dual-echo UTE imaging, known as porosity index (PI), as well as the signal ratio between UTE and inversion recovery UTE (IR-UTE) imaging, known as the suppression ratio (SR), are two rapid UTE-based bone evaluation techniques developed to reduce the time demand and cost in future clinical studies. The goal of this study was to investigate the performance of PI and SR in detecting bone quality differences between subjects with osteoporosis (OPo), osteopenia (OPe), and normal bone (Normal). METHODS: Tibial midshaft of fourteen OPe (72 ± 6 years old), thirty-one OPo (72 ± 6 years old), and thirty-seven Normal (36 ± 19 years old) subjects were scanned using dual-echo UTE and IR-UTE sequences on a clinical 3T scanner. Measured PI, SR, and bone thickness were compared between OPo, OPe, and normal bone (Normal) subjects using the Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) T-score and UTE-MRI results. RESULTS: PI was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (24.1%) and OPe (16.3%) groups. SR was significantly higher in the OPo group compared with the Normal (41.5%) and OPe (21.8%) groups. SR differences between the OPe and Normal groups were also statistically significant (16.2%). Cortical bone was significantly thinner in the OPo group compared with the Normal (22.0%) and OPe (13.0%) groups. DEXA T-scores in subjects were significantly correlated with PI (R=-0.32), SR (R=-0.50), and bone thickness (R=0.51). DISCUSSION: PI and SR, as rapid UTE-MRI-based techniques, may be useful tools to detect and monitor bone quality changes, in addition to bone morphology, in individuals affected by osteoporosis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC10070867/ /pubmed/37025410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1148345 Text en Copyright © 2023 Jerban, Ma, Moazamian, Athertya, Dwek, Jang, Woods, Chung, Chang and Du https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Jerban, Saeed
Ma, Yajun
Moazamian, Dina
Athertya, Jiyo
Dwek, Sophia
Jang, Hyungseok
Woods, Gina
Chung, Christine B.
Chang, Eric Y.
Du, Jiang
MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title_full MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title_fullStr MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title_full_unstemmed MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title_short MRI-based porosity index (PI) and suppression ratio (SR) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
title_sort mri-based porosity index (pi) and suppression ratio (sr) in the tibial cortex show significant differences between normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic female subjects
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10070867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1148345
work_keys_str_mv AT jerbansaeed mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT mayajun mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT moazamiandina mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT athertyajiyo mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT dweksophia mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT janghyungseok mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT woodsgina mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT chungchristineb mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT changericy mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects
AT dujiang mribasedporosityindexpiandsuppressionratiosrinthetibialcortexshowsignificantdifferencesbetweennormalosteopenicandosteoporoticfemalesubjects