Cargando…
Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor?
INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) is an established technique that uses sets of training data to develop algorithms and perform data classification without using human intervention/supervision. This study aims to determine how functional and anatomical brain connectivity (FC and SC) data can be us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.217 |
_version_ | 1785019126631104512 |
---|---|
author | Tran, Khue Salazar, Betsy H. Boone, Timothy B. Khavari, Rose Karmonik, Christof |
author_facet | Tran, Khue Salazar, Betsy H. Boone, Timothy B. Khavari, Rose Karmonik, Christof |
author_sort | Tran, Khue |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) is an established technique that uses sets of training data to develop algorithms and perform data classification without using human intervention/supervision. This study aims to determine how functional and anatomical brain connectivity (FC and SC) data can be used to classify voiding dysfunction (VD) in female MS patients using ML. METHODS: Twenty‐seven ambulatory MS individuals with lower urinary tract dysfunction were recruited and divided into two groups (Group 1: voiders [V, n = 14]; Group 2: VD [n = 13]). All patients underwent concurrent functional MRI/urodynamics testing. RESULTS: Best‐performing ML algorithms, with highest area under the curve (AUC), were partial least squares (PLS, AUC = 0.86) using FC alone and random forest (RF) when using SC alone (AUC = 0.93) and combined (AUC = 0.96) as inputs. Our results show 10 predictors with the highest AUC values were associated with FC, indicating that although white matter was affected, new connections may have formed to preserve voiding initiation. CONCLUSIONS: MS patients with and without VD exhibit distinct brain connectivity patterns when performing a voiding task. Our results demonstrate FC (grey matter) is of higher importance than SC (white matter) for this classification. Knowledge of these centres may help us further phenotype patients to appropriate centrally focused treatments in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10071087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-100710872023-04-05 Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? Tran, Khue Salazar, Betsy H. Boone, Timothy B. Khavari, Rose Karmonik, Christof BJUI Compass Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Machine learning (ML) is an established technique that uses sets of training data to develop algorithms and perform data classification without using human intervention/supervision. This study aims to determine how functional and anatomical brain connectivity (FC and SC) data can be used to classify voiding dysfunction (VD) in female MS patients using ML. METHODS: Twenty‐seven ambulatory MS individuals with lower urinary tract dysfunction were recruited and divided into two groups (Group 1: voiders [V, n = 14]; Group 2: VD [n = 13]). All patients underwent concurrent functional MRI/urodynamics testing. RESULTS: Best‐performing ML algorithms, with highest area under the curve (AUC), were partial least squares (PLS, AUC = 0.86) using FC alone and random forest (RF) when using SC alone (AUC = 0.93) and combined (AUC = 0.96) as inputs. Our results show 10 predictors with the highest AUC values were associated with FC, indicating that although white matter was affected, new connections may have formed to preserve voiding initiation. CONCLUSIONS: MS patients with and without VD exhibit distinct brain connectivity patterns when performing a voiding task. Our results demonstrate FC (grey matter) is of higher importance than SC (white matter) for this classification. Knowledge of these centres may help us further phenotype patients to appropriate centrally focused treatments in the future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10071087/ /pubmed/37025479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.217 Text en © 2023 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tran, Khue Salazar, Betsy H. Boone, Timothy B. Khavari, Rose Karmonik, Christof Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title | Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title_full | Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title_fullStr | Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title_full_unstemmed | Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title_short | Classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: Is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
title_sort | classification of multiple sclerosis women with voiding dysfunction using machine learning: is functional connectivity or structural connectivity a better predictor? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10071087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37025479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trankhue classificationofmultiplesclerosiswomenwithvoidingdysfunctionusingmachinelearningisfunctionalconnectivityorstructuralconnectivityabetterpredictor AT salazarbetsyh classificationofmultiplesclerosiswomenwithvoidingdysfunctionusingmachinelearningisfunctionalconnectivityorstructuralconnectivityabetterpredictor AT boonetimothyb classificationofmultiplesclerosiswomenwithvoidingdysfunctionusingmachinelearningisfunctionalconnectivityorstructuralconnectivityabetterpredictor AT khavarirose classificationofmultiplesclerosiswomenwithvoidingdysfunctionusingmachinelearningisfunctionalconnectivityorstructuralconnectivityabetterpredictor AT karmonikchristof classificationofmultiplesclerosiswomenwithvoidingdysfunctionusingmachinelearningisfunctionalconnectivityorstructuralconnectivityabetterpredictor |